Reflecting upon the Long-term Impact of COVID-19 on Cosmetic Plastic Surgery and Education.

As we enter a new year, this article serves as an opportunity to ponder on the impact of a worldwide pandemic on physicians and the field of plastic surgery, which began 4 years ago in January 2020. When looking at the data in the general-surgery and reconstructive literature, the surgical treatment of patients with COVID-19 appears safest 8 weeks after infection. It was also found that the so-called Zoom-boom crush of cosmetic surgery cases following pandemic lockdown appeared to be largely due to a backlog of cases. Cosmetic surgery, particularly facial cosmetic surgery, continues to increase in popularity year over year. However, the effects on plastic surgery training remain unclear. Even so, those affected by the pandemic seem more driven than ever to find job stability and security.

A Novel Approach to Reducing Splash Exposure in Pulsatile Lavage.

Pulsatile lavage is utilized to copiously irrigate contaminated wounds; however, the current devices can cause significant splashing and increase the risk of contaminated fluid exposure to healthcare professionals. To create a larger splash guard for the standard pulsatile lavage device, we use heavy scissors to remove the end of a plastic light handle. We then place the nozzle of the lavage device through the open end to create a larger splash guard. This method provides a quick, accessible way to decrease the risk of splash exposure due to pulsatile lavage irrigation.

Timing of Gastrografin administration in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): Does it matter?

BACKGROUND: Gastrografin challenge is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool to predict patients who may benefit from nonoperative management in adhesive small bowel obstruction. This study explores the optimal timing of Gastrografin in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction by comparing early versus late Gastrografin challenge. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from January 2016 to January 2018 identified patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction who underwent Gastrografin challenge. A receiver operating characteristic curve, to predict a duration of stay less than 5 days, calculated a 12-hour limit which separated early and late groups. Nonoperative and operative patients were compared separately. Our primary outcome was duration of stay. Secondary outcomes included operative requirement, time to the operating room, complication rate, and 1-year mortality. In a separate analysis, multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors for 1-year mortality. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients were identified (58 early, 76 late). In nonoperative patients, the early group had a shorter duration of stay (3.2 days vs 5.4 days), fewer complications, and a lower complication and 1-year mortality rate (P < .05). In operative patients, the early group had a shorter preoperative duration of stay (1.8 days vs 3.9 days) (P < .05). On multivariable regression, congestive heart failure, any postoperative complication, and operative requirement were the best predictors of 1-year mortality (R2 = 0.321; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Gastrografin administration within 12 hours of adhesive small bowel obstruction diagnosis had favorable outcomes in terms of duration of stay, complications, and mortality in nonoperative patients. Moreover, in operative patients, preoperative duration of stay was shortened. Our findings suggest protocolizing early Gastrografin challenge may be an important principle in adhesive small bowel obstruction management.

Breast Reconstruction in Inflammatory Breast Cancer: An Analysis of Predictors, Trends, and Survival from the National Cancer Database.

INTRODUCTION: Survival for women diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has improved with advances in multimodal therapy. This study was performed to evaluate trends, predictors, and survival for reconstruction in IBC patients in the United States. METHODS: Women who underwent mastectomy with or without reconstruction for IBC between 2004 and 2016 were included from the National Cancer Database. Predictors for undergoing reconstruction and association with overall survival were determined. RESULTS: Of 12,544 patients with IBC who underwent mastectomy, 1307 underwent reconstruction. Predictors of reconstruction included younger age, private insurance, higher income, performance of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, and location within a metropolitan area (P < 0.001). The proportion of women having reconstruction for IBC increased from 7.3% to 12.3% from 2004 to 2016. Median unadjusted overall survival was higher in the reconstructive group l [93.7 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 75.2-117.5] than the nonreconstructive group (68.1 months, 95% CI 65.5-71.7, hazard ratio = 0.79 95% CI 0.72-0.88, P < 0.001). With adjustment for covariates, differences in overall mortality were not significant, with hazard ratio of 0.95 (95% CI 0.85-1.06, P = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction rates for IBC are increasing. Women with IBC who undergo reconstruction tend to be younger and are not at the increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to those not having reconstruction. The National Cancer Database does not differentiate immediate from delayed reconstruction. However, the outcomes of immediate reconstruction in carefully selected patients with IBC should be further studied to evaluate its safety. This could impact current guidelines, which are based largely on an expert opinion.

Early postoperative outcomes in implant, pedicled, and free flap reconstruction for breast cancer: an analysis of 23,834 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients seek breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Debate exists regarding the best reconstructive option. The authors evaluate outcomes comparing implant, free flap, and pedicled flap reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing implant, pedicled flap, and free flap reconstruction were identified in the 2011-2016 NSQIP database. Demographics were analyzed and covariates were balanced using overlap propensity score. Logistic regression was used for binary outcomes and Gamma GLM for length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of 23,834 patients, 87.7% underwent implant, 8.1% free flap, and 4.2% pedicled flap reconstruction. The implant group had the lowest mean operative time (206 min, SD 85.6). Implant patients had less pneumonia (OR 0.09, CI 0.02-0.36, p < 0.01), return to operating room (OR 0.62, CI 0.50-0.75, p < 0.01), venous thromboembolism (VTE) (OR 0.33, CI 0.14-0.79, p = 0.01), postoperative bleeding (OR 0.10, CI 0.06-0.15, p < 0.01), and urinary tract infections (UTI) (OR 0.21, CI 0.07-0.58, p < 0.01) than free flap patients. Pedicled flap patients had less postoperative bleeding (OR 0.69, CI 0.49-0.96, p = 0.03) than free flap patients. Pedicled flap patients had more superficial surgical site infections (p = 0.03), pneumonia (p = 0.02), postoperative bleeding (p < 0.01), VTE (p = 0.04), sepsis (p = 0.05), and unplanned reintubation (p = 0.01) than implant patients. Implant patients had the lowest LOS (1.6 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Implant reconstruction has less short-term postoperative complications than free flaps and pedicled flap reconstructions. The overall complication rate among all reconstructive modalities remains acceptably low and patients should be informed of all surgical options.

A Theoretical Model Describing the Dynamics of Venous Flow in the DIEP Flap.

BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric artery flap is an integral component of autologous breast reconstruction. The technical aspects of performing the flap have been well-established. A prior mathematical model suggested using the largest perforator and concluded that the inclusion of additional perforators may decrease resistance and increase flow, but at the downside of increased tissue trauma. Many complications may result from inadequate venous drainage of the flap and the same mathematical concepts may be applied. We attempt to give a mathematical model, based on the physics of flow and properties of circuits, to explain clinical observations regarding venous drainage of the flap and the complications that may arise. METHODS: We compare the different possible venous drainage systems of a perforator flap to a complex circuit with multiple resistances. Multiple venous perforators will be represented by resistances in parallel, while the deep and superficial drainage systems will be represented by a complex circuit loop. RESULTS: Drainage of the flap may be optimized through the deep drainage system if the venous perforators are of sufficient size. Inclusion of additional perforators may decrease resistance and enhance drainage. Salvage procedures may be necessary when the venous perforators are insufficient in size or when there are insufficient connections between the deep and superficial systems. CONCLUSION: A single large sized vessel may provide adequate drainage in most DIEP flaps, while the use of multiple vessels may enhance drainage upon the encounter of smaller vessels. Salvage procedures may be needed to relieve venous congestion as the design of the venous system becomes more complicated.

Use of Prolonged Prophylactic Antibiotics with Closed Suction Drains in Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair.

Closed suction drains (CSD) are commonly used in ventral hernia repair (VHR), with or without prolonged postoperative prophylactic antibiotics (PPA) for the duration of their use. We examine the evidence that PPA with CSD reduce surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing VHR. We also examine the evidence assessing the association between SSI and CSD in VHR. A systematic review of PubMed, CIHNL, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies analyzing rates of SSI with CSD in patients undergoing abdominal VHR and related procedures with or without the concomitant use of PPA. The primary outcome was the rate of SSI. Five studies totaling 772 patients were identified, 525 patients were confirmed to have CSD, and 434 patients received prolonged antibiotics while drains were in place. PPA had no significant effect on SSI in two studies and were associated with decreased SSI in one study (Odds ratio 0.235, 95% confidence interval 0.090-0.617, P = 0.003). Two studies documented a higher rate of SSI in patients with CSD (79% vs 49% and 19% vs 10%) on univariate analysis. One study demonstrated a very low risk of SSI despite CSD (4.2%) and another demonstrated no increased risk with or without CSD. The use of drains is not clearly associated with an increased risk of SSI in VHR, and there is limited evidence to support antibiotic use while the drains are in place to decrease the potential risk. Prospective randomized studies are needed to more clearly assess these associations.

Incidence and impact of rejection following simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Due to hepatic immunoregulation, simultaneous liver-kidney recipients are presumed to be reasonably protected from kidney rejection and typically receive less immunosuppression compared to kidney transplants alone. However, data to support these conclusions and practices are sparse. METHODS: We characterized the incidence and types of rejection, graft function, and graft and patient survival in a large population of simultaneous liver-kidney recipients (n=140) with long-term follow-up at our centre (1998-2010). RESULTS: Acute cellular, antibody-mediated, and chronic kidney rejection was diagnosed in 9 (6.4%), 2 (1.4%), and 1 (0.7%) patient, respectively. Borderline acute kidney rejection was diagnosed in another 16 patients (11.4%). Acute cellular liver rejection occurred in 16 (11.4%) and chronic liver rejection in 4 (2.9%). One-, three-, and five-year patient survival was 86.4%, 78.0%, and 74.0%, respectively, and did not significantly differ by presence or absence of kidney or liver rejection. However, kidney rejection was associated with decreased renal function by lower serum GFR over time (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Various forms of kidney rejection occurred in ∼20% of our simultaneous liver-kidney recipients and were associated with deterioration in graft function, indicating that the liver may not confer complete protective allo-immunity. More stringent graft monitoring and management strategies, perhaps more akin to kidney transplant alone, should be prospectively studied in simultaneous liver-kidney recipients.