Patient Satisfaction with a Novel Tele-Cystoscopy Model: Expanding Access to Bladder Cancer Surveillance for Rural Patients.

Background: Tele-cystoscopy involves trained advanced practice providers performing cystoscopy with real-time interpretation by an urologist. The goal of this externally validated care model is to expand the availability of cystoscopy to underserved rural areas. Herein we report on population demographics and describe the socioeconomic benefits of tele-cystoscopy for bladder cancer surveillance. Methods: Using an IRB-approved protocol, patients were consented for dual, sequential cystoscopy wherein they experienced a standard-of-care cystoscopy along with tele-cystoscopy. Patients completed a questionnaire that contained both subjective and objective health and socioeconomic-related questions as well as a satisfaction survey. Patients were also probed about factors associated with transportation to their cystoscopy appointments including gasoline costs, travel time, and time off work. Using the Distressed Community Index, patients were ascribed an economic resource category ranging from prosperous to distressed. Results: In total, 48 patients with a mean age of 55 completed surveys after completing dual cystoscopies. Thirteen patients (27%) were uninsured and 10 patients (20%) had Medicaid as primary insurance. The tele-cystoscopy clinic saved patients an average of 235 miles and 434 min of travel time. In total, 82% of patients resided in a distressed community indicating fewer economic resources. Satisfaction results showed a mean score of 31.38 (out of 32). Conclusions: Patients were satisfied with tele-cystoscopy, noting increased access to health care and fewer disruptions impacting bladder cancer surveillance. Tele-cystoscopy may be a viable option to expand access and improve adherence to guidelines for bladder cancer surveillance, particularly benefiting patients in rural areas and those of lower socioeconomic status.

Impact of SPY Fluorescence Angiography on Incidence of Ureteroenteric Stricture After Urinary Diversion.

PURPOSE: Ureteroenteric strictures (UESs) are a common and morbid complication of radical cystectomy and urinary diversions. UES occurs in 4% to 25% of all patients undergoing urinary diversion, and anastomotic ischemia is implicated in stricture formation. SPY fluorescence angiography is a technology that can be employed during open surgery that allows for evaluation of ureteral perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective single-institution study of intraoperative use of SPY for ureteral assessment with a primary outcome of UES incidence compared with a cohort of historic controls prior to the use of SPY during urinary diversion at our institution. Chart abstraction was conducted to determine the presence of confirmed stricture in these patients, defined as endoscopic diagnosis or definitive imaging findings. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 test for UES incidence. Demographics characteristics were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank sum test and χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients underwent urinary diversion during the study period. UES occurred in 31 of 277 patients (11.1%) in the control group compared with 1 of 55 patients (1.8%) enrolled in the SPY arm (P = .03). The per-ureter UES rate was 6.7% (33/582) in the control group compared with 0.9% (1/107) in the SPY group. Median follow-up in the SPY group was 17.5 months and 58.6 months in the control group. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5 in the SPY group and 4 in the control group. There were no other significant demographic differences between the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: SPY fluorescent angiography can be used during open urinary diversion to ensure perfusion to ureteroenteric anastomosis. Our single-institution study demonstrates a decreased incidence of UES when ureteral perfusion assessment is performed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO.: NCT05022199.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Clear Cell Likelihood Score Against Renal Mass Biopsy for Evaluating Small Renal Masses.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost-effectiveness of the clear cell likelihood score compared to renal mass biopsy (RMB) alone. METHODS: The clear cell likelihood score, a new grading system based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, has been proposed as a possible alternative to percutaneous RMB for identifying clear cell renal carcinoma in small renal masses and expediting treatment of high-risk patients. A decision analysis model was developed to compare a RMB strategy where all patients undergo biopsy and a clear cell likelihood score strategy where only patients that received an indeterminant score of 3 undergo biopsy. Effectiveness was assigned 1 for correct diagnoses and 0 for incorrect or indeterminant diagnoses. Costs were obtained from institutional fees and Medicare reimbursement rates. Probabilities were derived from literature estimates from radiologists trained in the clear cell likelihood score. RESULTS: In the base case model, the clear cell likelihood score was both more effective (0.77 vs 0.70) and less expensive than RMB ($1629 vs $1966). Sensitivity analysis found that the nondiagnostic rate of RMB and the sensitivity of the clear cell likelihood score had the greatest impact on the model. In threshold analyses, the clear cell likelihood score was the preferred strategy when its sensitivity was greater than 62.7% and when an MRI cost less than $5332. CONCLUSION: The clear cell likelihood score is a more cost-effective option than RMB alone for evaluating small renal masses for clear cell renal carcinoma.

Altered male physiologic function after surgery for prostate cancer: couple perspective

Purpose: Both the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and the physiologic outcomes of surgical treatment impact the male’s psychological sphere. However, current research advocates a refocusing of outcomes directed to the PCa “couple”. Herein we acquire insight into perspective and concordance regarding male physiological function from the standpoint of a couple recovering from PCa surgery. Materials and methods: Couples whereby the male partner had undergone primary surgical treatment for PCa were mailed a Retrospective Sexual Survey (RSS) packet consisting of male and female partner questionnaires. RSS questions surveyed physiological changes in libido, foreplay, erection and arousal, orgasm and ejaculation in addition to perceived psychological impact. Patients’ and partners’ scores were evaluated to determine the concordance of both individual items as well as domain sums. Results: Twenty-eight couples completed the questionnaires. Only about 40 percent of men and women were happy with their levels of sexual interest with 82 percent concordance. Urine loss during orgasm was reported by 43 percent of men; the majority of participants were bothered by it. Ejaculation changes were observed by 96 percent of men (concordance 96 percent) with most reporting anejaculation. A change in orgasm experience was noted by 86 percent of men (and 36 percent of their female partners, p < 0.0001). Despite the change, the majority of men and women reported being satisfied with their ability to climax. Conclusion: Our results indicate that patients and their female partners may interpret differently the same physiological outcomes of PCa surgery. This information could be useful to better counsel the PCa couple and help patients and partners adjust after surgery.