Physical therapy and pharmacy interprofessional education in the context of a university pro bono physical therapy setting.

Interprofessional care is the standard for quality in healthcare. Interprofessional education (IPE) is an accreditation requirement in many health-care fields. This qualitative study evaluated the benefits of an interprofessional education program for Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) and Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students in the context of a pro bono physical therapy setting focused on reducing fall risk among older adults. For each pro bono participant, PharmD and DPT students worked together to analyze fall risk of the participating older adults. PharmD students completed a medication review while the DPT students completed balance assessments. Each profession recommended adjustments to care and presented their findings to peers, faculty, and participants. Following completion of the IPE program, students completed a voluntary evaluation with seven questions requiring semi-structured written reflection regarding their IPE experience. Student reflective responses from 2014-2016 were coded by IPE faculty using a coding guide collaboratively developed by the study team. Descriptive analysis included a summary of code frequency by year, discipline and Interprofessional Education Collaborative core competency: Values and Ethics, Communication, Teams and Teamwork, and Roles and Responsibilities. Values and Ethics were the most frequently coded core competency. Students consistently noted the importance of valuing the other profession, understanding each other's roles, having good interprofessional communication, and working within a health-care team. Additional codes emerged during the analysis process. Written reflective findings suggest that hands-on collaboration, focused on a real-world problem (fall risk) relevant to both PharmD and DPT students, enabled interprofessional care that benefited students through real-world practice of skills learned during coursework, and benefited clinical participants through increased awareness of physical function and medication factors that could affect fall risk. Findings indicate that a pro bono physical therapy setting can provide hands-on learning that meets IPE accreditation requirements and student learning needs while addressing a public health concern.

DPT Student Perceptions about Developing Mentoring Skills: A Progressive Model.

INTRODUCTION: Students in doctoral physical therapy (DPT) education must develop professional skills including mentoring. The purpose of this study was to investigate student perceptions of developing mentoring skills within a post-baccalaureate DPT curriculum. SUBJECTS: Forty students from a physical therapy program participated and completed a survey tool. Five students from the same cohort completed the focus group. METHODS: A mixed-methods study design was used with students completing the Mentoring Culture Assessment (MCA). A focus group was used to provide further explanation. Coding of the focus group transcript was conducted with four themes emerging to support the survey results. RESULTS: Part 1 of the MCA examined characteristics of a good mentor, Part 2 examined a person's ability to mentor, and Part 3 examined what facilitates a mentoring culture. Results were in agreement with the descriptors in Part 1 and 3. Responses were mixed for Part 2. CONCLUSION: Results support that this peer mentoring model reinforces the development of mentoring skills, confidence with clinical teaching, and the building of positive relationships. Collaborative learning continues throughout professional careers, and this mentoring model could be useful in other health fields where clinical practice and preparation for future clinical instruction are expected.

The Integrated Clinical Education Strategic Initiatives Project-Development of Parameters to Guide Harmonization in Clinical Education: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Clinical education curricular models specifically related to integrated clinical education (ICE) vary across physical therapist education programs. The interconnectedness of ICE to the advancement of a shared vision for clinical education in professional physical therapist education needs investigating. PURPOSE: The purpose of this scoping review was to: (1) define ICE, (2) define baseline expectations and parameters of ICE, and (3) discern and describe current ICE models. DATA SOURCES: Databases accessed included Medline, MedlinePlus with Full, CINAHL, and CINAHL Plus with full text. STUDY SELECTION: A multimodal data collection scoping review was completed. Data collection included survey research, a systematic review of the literature, and a series of focus groups. The McMaster Critical Appraisal Tool assessed methodological study quality. A qualitative, metasynthesis approach was used for data synthesis. Consensus agreement produced results. DATA EXTRACTION: Twenty-two articles were included in the literature review from the health disciplines of medicine, nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology. Data synthesis produced 8 parameters defining the factors essential to categorizing clinical education experiences as ICE in physical therapist education. The 8 parameters and ICE definition are supported by a description of models of ICE that currently exist within health profession curricula. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data synthesis followed a qualitative, metasynthesis approach. Themes emerged from the surveys, literature review, and focus group data. Patterns were compared, analyzed, and synthesized to generate the themes and ICE parameters. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias from the literature search could have limited the richness of the model descriptions by unintentional exclusion of articles, and might limit the applicability of results beyond the United States. Sampling bias from survey and focus groups, although purposeful, might have limited a broader description of current viewpoints about ICE. However, the data sources, including multiple health profession perspectives coupled with consensus agreement, provide sound evidence in development of profession-based parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this scoping review provide the profession with a standard definition of ICE and parameters that can guide a program in designing a curriculum using ICE experiences as a foundation. A recommended next step is to design education research studies using reliable and valid outcome measures across programs to determine impact and effectiveness of ICE as an educational intervention.