Alberta dairy farmers' and veterinarians' opinion about bovine leukemia virus control measures.

A high herd and within-herd prevalence of Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV) infections in the dairy herds of North America and the negative effects thereof caused the Alberta dairy industry to initiate the development of an on farm BLV control program. Because BLV control is dependent on the commitment of the farmer, potential barriers were identified and farmers' and veterinarians' points of view toward different control options were investigated to inform how the control program might be adjusted. Conversations with these stakeholders were sought and four focus groups with farmers and eleven interviews with veterinarians were conducted. Testing for BLV, the most common BLV control strategies (testing/culling/segregation/management), as well as on farm best management practices (BMP) to prevent the transmission of BLV, were discussed. The thematic analysis of these conversations resulted in the following findings: Testing of animals was considered important for BLV control, but the financial investment was prohibitive for farmers. Test and cull as well as test and segregation approaches of test positive animals were considered efficient BLV control measures, but impractical and not feasible due to the supply managed Alberta dairy industry (i.e. milk is produced based on demand), with a high prevalence. The management of test positive animals with BMP to prevent new infections and thereby decreasing the within-herd prevalence was considered the only realistic BLV control strategy. The most important barriers for suggested BMP were the cost for some BMP, the inconvenience of performing other BMP, as well as difficulties in performing some BMP consistently and well. Additionally, a lack of knowledge about BLV and its control were identified as an important barrier. On the contrary, farmers indicated being inclined to implement BMP they considered feasible or that were considered a standard within the industry. Further, if BMP increased convenience on farm, they were considered easy to implement. Farmers and veterinarians agreed in many, but not all cases. For example, the single use of examination sleeves was met with differing opinions (i.e. considered doable by farmers while veterinarians assumed it to be too costly). In conclusion, stakeholders' awareness and communication amongst each other (e.g. veterinarians and farmers) about BLV and its control has to be highlighted in order to manage BLV infection successfully. In addition, by communicating and understanding barriers and motivators for specific BMP, important barriers could be identified (e.g. difficulties while changing needles), and solutions found (e.g. tool belt for needles), thereby improving BLV control efforts on farm.

Invited review: Bovine leukemia virus-Transmission, control, and eradication.

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection, endemic in North American dairy herds, has production-limiting effects. A literature review of available papers published since 1995 concerning BLV transmission and its control was conducted. Although confirmed transmission routes were reviewed (blood, natural breeding, in utero, colostrum, and milk), there is still a lack of detailed information on other specific risks for transmission (e.g., contact transmission and hoof-trimming knives). Eradication of BLV has been achieved by combined management, segregation, and culling approaches. In contrast, although sole implementation of best management practices aimed at prevention of BLV transmission has decreased within-herd BLV prevalence, it has not eradicated BLV from a herd. Therefore, control and eradication of BLV by best management practices only should be further investigated. Additionally, the role of proviral load in infected cattle was investigated. Cattle with a high proviral load seem to be more likely to infect others, whereas those with a very low proviral load seem to have low risks of transmitting BLV. Information on proviral load could be taken into account when controlling BLV in high-prevalence herds. In conclusion, there is a need for detailed, large-scale studies investigating roles of specific transmission routes, knowing proviral load of infected individuals.

Pilot implementation of a newly developed bovine leukemia virus control program on 11 Alberta dairy farms.

We developed a custom bovine leukemia virus (BLV) control program for the Alberta dairy industry, consisting of a risk assessment and a comprehensive list of best management practices (BMP) aimed at prevention of BLV transmission between cattle. This control program was implemented on 11 farms for approximately 1 yr. Blood samples were collected from all cattle ≥12 mo old, and serum was tested with a commercial ELISA. Risk assessments were performed on each farm, risk-connected on-farm management was identified, and management changes expected to prevent transmission of BLV between cattle were suggested by the first author and agreed upon with each farmer. Throughout the following year, all participating farmers were visited multiple times to identify and overcome barriers to implementation and to monitor progress. After approximately 1 yr of implementing BLV control, all cattle ≥12 mo old on farm with a negative or no previous test result were sampled, and the within-herd prevalence was determined. The median number of cattle on farm that were ≥12 mo was 195 (range 110-524). The initial prevalence averaged 39% (13-66%). On average, 5 BMP (3-7) were suggested to each farmer. On average, 4 BMP (1-7) were implemented. At the second sampling, the average within-herd prevalence of all animals that tested positive (including the previous sampling) was 36% (12-62%). Eight farms reduced their within-herd BLV prevalence, within-herd prevalence stayed constant on 1 farm, and it increased on 1 farm. The remaining farm terminated their participation before the second sampling. The number of seroconversions per farm ranged from 3 to 109, highlighting the success of some producers to minimize new infections. The risk assessment was proven to be a valuable tool to identify flaws in on-farm management, although risk assessment score was unrelated to the within-herd BLV prevalence. Finally, it appeared that implementation of BMP aimed at prevention of BLV transmission between cattle could reduce within-herd BLV prevalence when farmers committed to their implementation.

Economic evaluation of 4 bovine leukemia virus control strategies for Alberta dairy farms.

Bovine leukemia virus (BLV) is a production-limiting disease common in North American dairy herds. To make evidence-based recommendations to Canadian dairy producers and their consultants regarding cost and financial benefits of BLV on-farm control, an economic model that takes the supply-managed milk quota system into account is necessary. Alberta-specific input variables were used for the presented analysis. A decision tree model program was used to evaluate economic aspects of decreasing a 40% BLV within-herd prevalence on dairy farms by implementing various control strategies over 10 yr. Investigated strategies were (1) all management strategies, including 3 options for colostrum management; (2) some management strategies; (3) test and cull; and (4) test and segregate. Each of these strategies was compared with a no control on-farm approach. The prevalence for this no-control approach was assumed to stay constant over time. Each control strategy incurred specific yearly cost and yielded yearly decreases in prevalence, thereby affecting yearly partial net revenue. Infection with BLV was assumed to decrease milk production, decrease cow longevity, and increase condemnation of carcasses at slaughter from cattle with enzootic bovine leukosis, thereby decreasing net revenue. Cows infected with BLV generated a yearly mean partial net revenue of Can$7,641, whereas noninfected cows generated Can$8,276. Mean cost for the control strategies ranged from Can$193 to Can$847 per animal over 10 yr in a 146-animal herd. Net benefits of controlling BLV on farm, as compared with not controlling BLV, per cow in a 146-animal herd over a 10-yr period for each strategy was: Can$1,315 for all management strategies (freezer); Can$1,243 for all management strategies (pasteurizer); Can$785 for all management strategies (powdered colostrum); Can$1,028 for some management strategies; Can$1,592 for test and cull; and Can$1,594 for test and segregate. Consequently, on-farm BLV control was financially beneficial. Even though negative net benefits were possible and expected for some iterations, our sensitivity analysis highlighted the overall robustness of our model. In summary, this model provided evidence that Canadian dairy farmers should be encouraged to control BLV on their farm.

Short communication: Evaluation of 5 different ELISA for the detection of bovine leukemia virus antibodies.

Although Canadian dairy herds have been infected with bovine leukemia virus (BLV) for years, recent research has put new emphasis on the potential negative effects of this infection. Consequently, BLV control is becoming more favorable; however, BLV control cannot be successful without identifying infected animals. Bovicheck BLV (Biovet, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada) is currently the only assay licensed by the Canadian Centre for Veterinary Biologics. The first goal of this study was, therefore, to determine the reproducibility of the Bovicheck BLV assay for serum samples derived from Canadian cattle. The second goal was to evaluate and compare 5 different ELISA and determine their test characteristics using serum samples from Canadian herds. The considered ELISA were Bovicheck BLV, ID Screen BLV Competition (IDvet, Grabels, France), Idexx Leukosis Serum X2 Ab Test (Idexx Europe B.V., Hoofddorp, the Netherlands), Svanovir BLV gp51-Ab (Svanova, Uppsala, Sweden), and the Serelisa BLV Ab Mono Indirect (Synbiotics, Lyon, France). Eighty serum samples from Canadian cattle provided by Prairie Diagnostic Services (PDS; Saskatoon, SK, Canada) and an additional 80 serum samples from Canadian dairy and beef herds were used for the study. The Bovicheck BLV assay yielded the same results for all PDS-derived samples, implying a high level of reproducibility and robustness of this assay. Additionally, the comparison of the assays' results showed high agreement between assays, with Cohen's kappa values between κ = 0.91 and κ = 1. Furthermore, using original test results of the field samples as true status, relative diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Relative diagnostic sensitivity of all tests was 100%. False-positive results were probable; therefore, the following relative diagnostic specificities were determined: 100% for Bovicheck BLV, Idexx Leukosis Serum X2, and Svanovir BLV; 95% for ID Screen BLV; and 97% for Serelisa BLV. When considering other test characteristics, ID Screen BLV is exceptional due to considerable practical advantages.