An advanced bipolar device helps reduce the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Advanced bipolar devices (ABD; e.g., LigaSure™) have a lower blade temperature than ultrasonically activated devices (USAD; e.g., Harmonic® and Sonicision™) during activation, potentially enabling accurate lymph node dissection with less risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) due to pancreatic thermal injury in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of ABD and USAD in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) between August 2008 and September 2020. A total of 371 patients were enrolled, and short-term surgical outcomes, including the incidence of ISGPF grades B and C POPF, were compared between ABD and USAD. The risk factors for POPF in LDG were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A propensity score-matching algorithm was used to select 120 patients for each group. The POPF rate was significantly lower (0.8 vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001), the morbidity rate was lower (13.3 vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001), the length of postoperative hospitalization was shorter (14 vs. 19 days, p < 0.001), and the lymph node retrieval rate was higher (34 vs. 26, p < 0.001) with an ABD than with a USAD. There were no mortalities in either group. A multivariate analysis showed that a USAD was the only independent risk factor with a considerably high odds ratio for the occurrence of POPF (USAD/ABD, odds ratio 8.38, p = 0.0466). CONCLUSION: An ABD may improve the safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.

Repeated partial tissue bite with inadequate cooling time for an energy device may cause thermal injury.

BACKGROUND: Over the past three decades, the use of ultrasonically activated device (USAD) and advanced bipolar device (ABD) has grown in minimally invasive surgeries. However, the thermal profile differences during repeated dissection with different grasping ranges of energy devices, which provide valuable information for preventing thermal injury by energy devices, remain unclear. METHODS: We developed an ex vivo benchtop model to examine the temperature profile of the blade and jaws of two USADs (HARMONIC® ACE + and Sonicision™) and a ABD (Ligasure™ Maryland) with different grasping ranges (partial tissue and full tissue bite) in repeated dissection with minimum cooling time. The maximum temperature, time required for completion to dissection of 10 cm of porcine muscle, thermal spread, and cooling time to reach 60 °C were continuously measured using video thermography. In addition, to evaluate one more grasping range "no tissue", we performed a stress test that activated the USAD without tissue intervention to assess the effects of excessive load on the blade and jaw. RESULTS: Repeated dissection of energy devices with minimal cooling time results in high blade and jaw temperatures proportional to the incision distance. In particular, the USADs with partial tissue bite showed a significantly higher temperatures at the blade and jaw, longer cooling times, and higher lateral thermal spread than those with a full tissue bite and the ABD. The stress test with a USAD showed an extremely high blade temperature exceeding 400 °C, with the tissue pad melting only 13.2 s after activation. CONCLUSION: Although USAD with partial tissue bite help ensure precise dissection, repeated long activation with inadequate cooling time may increase the risk of thermal injury during surgery. These results suggest that surgeons should use energy devices properly while understanding the risks of adjacent organ damage that could result from abuse of the device.