[Reduction techniques in intramedullary nailing osteosynthesis]. / Repositionstechniken in der Marknagelosteosynthese.

Intramedullary nailing was originally conceived for the stabilization of shaft fractures of long bones. Due to new nail designs and multiple interlocking possibilities, the spectrum of nailing has significantly increased. Nailing of fractures beyond the isthmus is technically challenging because fractures need to be reduced before the nailing procedure starts. Indirect techniques of reduction include the use of an extension table, a large distractor or an external fixator. Direct reduction with pointed reduction forceps, lag screws, a cerclage wire or a short plate can optimize indirect reduction. The choice of the correct entry portal is of utmost importance for an optimal operative result. The location of the entry portal is dependent on the local anatomy and the bend of the nail. The optimal entry portal at the proximal tibia is directly behind the patellar tendon and accessible with the knee in more than 90° of flexion, alternatively through a suprapatellar approach with a slightly flexed knee joint. Insertion of the nail through the suprapatellar approach is possible without stress on the reduced fracture fragments. Blocking screws create an artificial isthmus in the metaphyseal area and force the guide wire in the desired direction. Blocking screws help to avoid axial malalignment during nail insertion. Interlocking of the nail with screws coming from different directions prevents secondary dislocation.

Humeral nailing revisited.

Unreamed interlocked humeral nailing for stabilisation of acute humeral fractures was introduced a decade ago. Antegrade and retrograde nail insertion are equally popular. The role of nailing as opposed to plating of humeral fractures is the subject of continuous debate. Between 1997 and 2005, 99 acute fractures of the humeral shaft were treated operatively with the unreamed humeral nail (UHN, Synthes) in our Level I Trauma Centre. The mean age of the patients was 63 years. Only eight patients (8.1%) were polytraumatised, nine patients had an open fracture (9.1%), five had a primary radial nerve palsy (5.1%). There were 54 antegrade and 45 retrograde nailings. The procedures were performed by 19 different surgeons, who carefully followed a detailed operation protocol. There were 6 adverse events: 3 secondary radial nerve palsies (3%), 2 fissures at the insertion point (2%) and one false placement of a locking screw (1%). Three patients developed pseudarthrosis (3%). Eight further operation were necessary (8.1%): 3 exploration of the radial nerve, 3 for treatment of pseudarthrosis, one replacement of a locking screw and one wound revision for superficial wound infection. Ninety patients (92 fractures) were evaluated after bone healing. Shoulder function was assessed using the Constant Score, elbow function with the Mayo Elbow Score. 91.3% and 5.4% of patients had an excellent or good shoulder function, 81.5% and 14.1% had an excellent or good elbow function. All patients with a functional deficit of the shoulder joint had antegrade, all patients with a deficit at the elbow joint retrograde nailing. Motor function recovered in all radial nerve palsies. 93.5% of patients had an excellent or good functional end result. Unreamed humeral nailing is a valid therapeutic option for stabilisation of acute humeral shaft fractures. Antegrade and retrograde nailing are associated with specific but different complications. By strictly adhering to the operation technique, the number and severity of complications can be reduced. When good fracture alignment and stability are obtained, uneventful bone healing with good functional outcome is the rule.