Characteristics and outcomes of patients developing pulmonary hypertension associated with proteasome inhibitors.

RATIONALE: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has been described in patients treated with proteasome inhibitors (PI). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between PI and PAH. METHODS: Characteristics of incident PAH cases previously treated with Carfilzomib or Bortezomib were analyzed from the French PH Registry and the VIGIAPATH program from 2004 to 2023, concurrently with a pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis using the WHO's global database, and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Eleven incident cases of PI associated PAH were identified (6 with Carfilzomib and 5 with Bortezomib) with a female: male ratio of 2.7:1, a median age of 61 years, and a median delay between PI first exposure and PAH of 6 months. Four patients died (2 from right heart failure, 1 from respiratory distress, and 1 from an unknown cause). At diagnosis, 6 were in NYHA-Fc III/IV with severe hemodynamic impairment (median mean pulmonary artery pressure of 39 mmHg, cardiac index 2.45 L/min·m-2, and pulmonary vascular resistance of 7.2 WU). In the WHO pharmacovigilance database, 166 cases of PH associated with PI were reported since 2013 with significant statistics of disproportionate reporting (SDR) for Carfilzomib, regardless of the definition of cases or control group. However, SDR for Bortezomib was inconsistent. The systematic review identified 17 clinical trials, and Carfilzomib was associated with a significantly higher risk of dyspnea, severe dyspnea and PH compared to Bortezomib. CONCLUSION: PI may induce PAH in patients undergoing treatment, with Carfilzomib emitting a stronger signal than Bortezomib, and these patients should be monitored closely.

Updated Clinical Classification and Hemodynamic Definitions of Pulmonary Hypertension and Its Clinical Implications.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) refers to a pathologic elevation of the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in a wide range of medical conditions. These conditions are classified according to similarities in pathophysiology and management in addition to their invasive hemodynamic profiles. The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension present the newest clinical classification system and includes significant updates to the hemodynamic definitions. Pulmonary hypertension is now hemodynamically defined as an mPAP > 20 mmHg, reduced from the previous threshold of ≥25 mmHg, due to important insights from both normative and prognostic data. Pulmonary vascular resistance has been extended into the definition of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension, with an updated threshold of >2 Wood Units (WU), to help differentiate pulmonary vascular disease from other causes of increased mPAP. Exercise pulmonary hypertension has been reintroduced into the hemodynamic definitions and is defined by an mPAP/cardiac output slope of >3 mmHg/L/min between rest and exercise. While these new hemodynamic thresholds will have a significant impact on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, no evidence-based treatments are available for patients with mPAP between 21-24 mmHg and/or PVR between 2-3 WU or with exercise PH. This review highlights the evidence underlying these major changes and their implications on the diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Pharmacological management of connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe, progressive pulmonary vasculopathy (Group 1 Pulmonary Hypertension (PH)) that complicates the course of many connective tissue diseases (CTD). Detailed testing is required to differentiate PAH from other types of PH caused by CTD such as left heart disease (Group 2 PH), pulmonary parenchymal disease (Group 3 PH), and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (Group 4 PH). PAH is most frequently seen in systemic sclerosis but can also be seen with systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed CTD, and primary Sjogren's syndrome. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the epidemiology of CTD-associated PAH, outlines the complex diagnosis approach, and finishes with an in-depth discussion on the current treatment paradigm. Focus is placed on challenges faced in the treatment of CTD-associated PAH, (decreased efficacy and poorer tolerance of pharmacological therapies) and includes a discussion on the future investigational treatments. EXPERT OPINION: Despite significant advances over the past decades with more aggressive treatment algorithms, CTD-associated PAH patients continue to have poorer survival compared to those with idiopathic PAH. This review highlights factors leading to disparate outcomes compared to other forms of PAH, and discusses on further improvements that may increase quality of life and survival for CTD-associated PAH patients.

Diagnosis and management of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is an orphan disease and uncommon etiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) characterized by substantial small pulmonary vein and capillary involvement. AREAS COVERED: PVOD, also known as 'PAH with features of venous/capillary involvement' in the current ESC/ERS classification. EXPERT OPINION: In recent years, particular risk factors for PVOD have been recognized, including genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors (such as exposure to occupational organic solvents, chemotherapy, and potentially tobacco). The discovery of biallelic mutations in the EIF2AK4 gene as the cause of heritable PVOD has been a breakthrough in understanding the molecular basis of PVOD. Venous and capillary involvement (PVOD-like) has also been reported to be relatively common in connective tissue disease-associated PAH (especially systemic sclerosis), and in rare pulmonary diseases like sarcoidosis and pulmonary Langerhans cell granulomatosis. Although PVOD and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) exhibit similarities, including severe precapillary PH, it is essential to differentiate between them since PVOD has a worse prognosis and requires specific management. Indeed, PVOD patients are characterized by poor response to PAH-approved drugs, which can lead to pulmonary edema and clinical deterioration. Due to the lack of effective treatments, early referral to a lung transplantation center is crucial.

Updated Hemodynamic Definition and Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a pathophysiological manifestation of a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by abnormally elevated pulmonary arterial pressures diagnosed on right heart catheterization. The 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PH provides a new hemodynamic definition to define PH by lowering the threshold of the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) to 20 mm Hg. Precapillary PH is thus now defined as a mPAP >20 mm Hg together with a normal pulmonary artery wedge pressure (<15 mm Hg) and an increased pulmonary vascular resistance (>2 Wood Units). The ESC/ERS 2022 Guidelines also introduce a revised clinical classification of PH while retaining its previous distinction between the five groups according to the underlying pathophysiology.

Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Update and Perspectives.

Risk stratification in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is crucial in assessing patient prognosis. It serves a prominent role in everyday patient care and can be determined using several validated risk assessment scores worldwide. The recently published 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines underline the importance of risk stratification not only at baseline but also during follow-up. Achieving a low-risk status has now become the therapeutic goal, emphasising the importance of personalised therapy. The application of these guidelines is also important in determining the timing for lung transplantation referral. In this review, we summarise the most relevant prognostic factors of PAH as well as the parameters used in PAH risk scores and their evolution in the guidelines over the last decade. Finally, we describe the central role that risk stratification plays in the current guidelines not only in European countries but also in Asian countries.

Association Between the Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index and Prognosis in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multicentre Study.

Background: Risk stratification is fundamental in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), defined as pulmonary arterial pulse pressure divided by right atrial pressure (RAP), is a hemodynamic index shown to predict acute right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in several settings. Our objective was to test the prognostic utility of PAPi in a diverse multicentre cohort of patients with PAH. Methods: A multicentre retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with a new diagnosis of PAH on right heart catheterization between January 2016 and December 2020 was undertaken across 4 major centres in Canada. Hemodynamic data, clinical data, and outcomes were collected. The association of PAPi and other hemodynamic variables with mortality was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic curves and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: We identified 590 patients with a mean age of 61.4 ± 15.5 years, with 66.3% being female. A low PAPi (defined as < 5.3) was associated with higher mortality at 1 year: 10.2% vs 5.2% (P = 0.02). In a multivariable model including age, sex, body mass index, and functional class, a low PAPi was associated with mortality at 1 year (area under the curveof 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.74). However, high RAP (> 8 mm Hg) was similarly predictive of mortality, with an area under the curve of 0.65. Conclusion: PAPi was associated with mortality in a large incident PAH cohort. However, the discriminative value of PAPi was not higher than that of RAP alone.

Contexte: La stratification des risques est fondamentale dans la prise en charge de l'hypertension artérielle pulmonaire (HTAP). L'indice de pulsatilité des artères pulmonaires (iPAP), défini comme la pression différentielle dans les artères pulmonaires divisée par la pression auriculaire droite (PAD), est un indice hémodynamique qui s'est révélé prédictif d'une dysfonction ventriculaire droite (VD) aiguë dans plusieurs situations. Notre objectif était d'évaluer l'utilité pronostique de l'iPAP dans une cohorte multicentrique diversifiée de patients atteints d'HTAP. Méthodologie: Une étude de cohorte multicentrique rétrospective de patients adultes consécutifs atteints d'une HTAP nouvellement diagnostiquée par cathétérisme cardiaque droit entre janvier 2016 et décembre 2020 a été effectuée dans quatre grands centres au Canada. Les données hémodynamiques, les données cliniques et les résultats ont été recueillis. La corrélation de l'iPAP et d'autres va-riables hémodynamiques avec la mortalité a été évaluée par les courbes caractéristiques opérationnelles du receveur et des modèles à risques proportionnels de Cox. Résultats: Nous avons recensé 590 patients dont l'âge moyen était de 61,4 ± 15,5 ans; la proportion de femmes était de 66,3 %. Un faible iPAP (défini comme une valeur < 5,3) a été associé à une hausse de la mortalité à 1 an : 10,2 % contre 5,2 % (p= 0,02). Dans un modèle multivarié comprenant l'âge, le sexe, l'indice de masse corporelle et la classe fonctionnelle, un faible iPAP a été associé à la mortalité à 1 an (aire sous la courbe de 0,64 [intervalle de confiance à 95 %; de 0,55 à 0,74]). Cependant, une PAD élevée (> 8 mmHg) a aussi été un facteur prédictif de mortalité, l'aire sous la courbe étant de 0,65. Conclusions: L'iPAP a été associé à la mortalité dans une vaste cohorte de patients atteints d'une HTAP. Toutefois, la valeur discriminante de l'iPAP n'a pas été supérieure à celle de la PAD seule.

Management of Acutely Decompensated Pulmonary Hypertension.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a severe life-threatening condition associated with increased pulmonary vascular resistance and resulting right heart dysfunction. Admission to intensive care unit with acutely decompensated right heart failure is a significant negative prognostic event with a high risk of multisystem organ dysfunction and death. Presentations are heterogenous and may combine signs of both diastolic and systolic dysfunction complicating management. Renal dysfunction is often present, but other organ systems can be involved resulting in findings such as acute hepatic dysfunction or bowel wall congestion and ischemia. The goals of therapy are to rapidly reverse ventriculo-arterial decoupling and reduce right ventricular afterload to prevent progression to refractory or irreversible right heart failure. Triggering events must be investigated for and addressed urgently if identified. Volume status management is critical and both noninvasive and invasive testing can aid in prognostication and guide management, including the use of inotropes and vasopressors. In cases of refractory right heart dysfunction, consideration of urgent lung transplantation and mechanical circulatory support is necessary. These patients should be managed at expert centers in an intensive care setting with a multidisciplinary team of practitioners experienced in the management of right heart dysfunction given the high short- and long-term mortality resulting from acute decompensated right heart failure.

Isolated Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Associated With BMPR2 Pathogenic Variants.

Heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is an uncommon cause of PAH and is associated most frequently with pathogenic variants of BMPR2. Prior studies have described abnormalities in pulmonary arterial, venous, and bronchial artery vessels associated with these pathogenic variants. In this series, we describe two patients who demonstrated pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and incidentally were identified by a next generation sequencing gene panel to carry variants of BMPR2 in the absence of PAH. Although pulmonary AVMs commonly are associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and rarely are seen in heritable PAH, evidence is increasing that abnormalities in the BMP9 pathway are found in both of these conditions. Through these cases and the current understanding of the BMP9 pathway, we propose that BMPR2 variants place patients at increased risk of pulmonary AVMs and may warrant screening.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension and COVID-19: Piecing the puzzle.

COVID-19 remains a health care concern despite the end of the pandemic. Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at a higher risk for developing severe COVID-19 complications. Studies investigating the COVID-19 clinical characteristics in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients have reported discordant conclusions so far. In this review, we summarize the literature pertaining to the clinical presentation of COVID-19 in patients with PAH. In addition, we discuss common pathological aspects and disease mechanisms between PAH and COVID-19. We present an overview of the different types of PAH-approved therapy and their potential utilization as a treatment in the context of COVID-19. Moreover, we summarize the clinical trials that assessed the safety and efficiency of PAH-approved drugs in COVID-19 patients. Finally, we conclude with proposals for prospective research studies.

Upfront riociguat and ambrisentan combination therapy for newly diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension: A prospective open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Initial combination therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and riociguat in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has limited supporting data. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-arm, open-label trial of riociguat, and ambrisentan for incident PAH patients in functional class III. The primary endpoint was pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) at 4-months. RESULTS: Twenty patients (59 ± 13 years old, 85% female) enrolled and 1 died before their 4-month follow-up. Fifteen patients completed a 4-month and 13 completed the 12-month follow-up. At 4-months PVR decreased 54% with an absolute change of -5.8 Wood units (95% CI -4.0; -7.5, p < 0.001). Other hemodynamic variables and risk scores also improved. Six patients discontinued riociguat and 8 discontinued ambrisentan, with 5 (25%) discontinuing both. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not support the routine use of riociguat plus ambrisentan in initial regimens. Future studies are needed to compare this strategy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and an ERA with respect to tolerability and long-term outcomes.