RESUMEN
Objective The advantage of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the differential diagnosis of schwannoma and meningioma remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and assess its utility in the differential diagnosis of schwannomas and meningiomas. Methods This study included 42 patients who underwent surgery and had pathological diagnoses of schwannomas (S group) or meningiomas (M group). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted using meningioma prevalence as the dependent variable, and confounders were selected from those with p-values <0.05, including calcification, dural tail sign, tumor volume, and SUVmax at each spinal level as independent variables. Results The SUVmax of the spinal canal type at the level of the cervical vertebrae was significantly higher in the M group (4.6 ± 0.8) than in the S group (2.7 ± 1.4; P = 0.017). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the dural tail sign was significantly associated with differential diagnosis between the S and M groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.851; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.704-1.031, p<0.001). Conclusions The dural tail sign on MRI, but not the SUVmax of FDG-PET, was the most useful for the differential diagnosis between schwannomas and meningiomas.
