RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare in vitro the fuoride release and uptake from 5 different esthetic restorative materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials tested were conventional GIC - Fuji 7, GC (group1), resin modifed GIC - Vitremer, 3M ESPE (group 2), polyacid modifed composite - Dyract, Dentsply (group 3), fuoride releasing composite - Tetric ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent (group 4), Giomer-Beautifl, Shofu (group 5). Fluoride release was estimated at 6th, 24th, 48th hour and weekly interval for 5 weeks. For fuoride recharge, each specimen was exposed to 2 ml of 1.23% APF gel for 4 minutes and fuoride release measured at 1st, 2nd, 3rd day and 7th day. The fuoride release and recharge was measured using fuoride ion specifc electrode. RESULTS: ANOVA and Tukey HSD test were used for statistical analysis. During tested period all materials showed statistically different capability to release and uptake fuoride. Groups 1 and 2 results were comparable in fuoride release. Similarly groups 3 and 5. Groups 1 and 2 vs 3, 4, 5 were statistically very highly signifcant. Only conventional GIC showed initial 'burst effect'. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: Materials tested showed potential for fuoride release and recharge. Different esthetic materials had variable fuoride release hence selection of materials should be guided by specifc clinical situations.
