Association between first-week propofol administration and long-term outcomes of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Propofol is commonly used in ICUs, but its long-term effects have not been thoroughly studied. In vitro studies suggest it may harm mitochondrial function, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between substantial propofol sedation and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre cohort study of critically ill, mechanically ventilated (≥7 days) adults to compare patients who received a substantial dose of propofol (cumulative >500 mg) during the first week of ICU admission with those who did not. The primary outcome was the association between substantial propofol administration and 6-month mortality, adjusted for relevant covariates. Subanalyses were performed for administration in the early (day 1-3) and late (day 4-7) acute phases of critical illness due to the metabolic changes in this period. Secondary outcomes included tracheostomy need and duration, length of ICU and hospital stay (LOS), discharge destinations, ICU, hospital, and 3-month mortality. RESULTS: A total of 839 patients were enrolled, with 73.7 % receiving substantial propofol administration (substantial propofol dose group). Six-month all-cause mortality was 32.4 %. After adjusting for relevant variables, we found no statistically significant difference in 6-month mortality between both groups. There were also no significant differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that substantial propofol administration during the first week of ICU stay in the least sick critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients is safe, with no significant associations found with 6-month mortality, ICU or hospital LOS, differences in discharge destinations or need for tracheostomy.

PERSUADE Survey-PERioperative AnestheSia and Intensive Care Management of Left VentricUlar Assist DevicE Implantation in Europe and the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively assess relevant institutional variations in anesthesia and intensive care management during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. DESIGN: The authors used a prospective data analysis. SETTING: This was an online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were from LVAD centers in Europe and the US. INTERVENTIONS: After investigating initial interest, 91 of 202 European and 93 of 195 US centers received a link to the survey targeting institutional organization and experience, perioperative hemodynamic monitoring, medical management, and postoperative intensive care aspects. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The survey was completed by 73 (36.1%) European and 60 (30.8%) US centers. Although most LVAD implantations were performed in university hospitals (>5 years of experience), significant differences were observed in the composition of the preoperative multidisciplinary team and provision of intraoperative care. No significant differences in monitoring or induction agents were observed. Propofol was used more often for maintenance in Europe (p < 0.001). The choice for inotropes changed significantly from preoperatively (more levosimendan in Europe) to intraoperatively (more use of epinephrine in both Europe and the US). The use of quantitative methods for defining right ventricular (RV) function was reported more often from European centers than from US centers (p < 0.05). Temporary mechanical circulatory support for the treatment of RV failure was more often used in Europe. Nitric oxide appeared to play a major role only intraoperatively. There were no significant differences in early postoperative complications reported from European versus US centers. CONCLUSIONS: Although the perioperative practice of care for patients undergoing LVAD implantation differs in several aspects between Europe and the US, there were no perceived differences in early postoperative complications.

A Retrospective Medical Record Review to Describe Health Status and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors of Bus Drivers in South Africa.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally. The occupational challenges of bus drivers may increase their risk of CVD, including developing obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. We evaluated the medical records of 266 bus drivers visiting an occupational medical practice between 2007 and 2017 in Johannesburg, South Africa, to determine the health status of bus drivers and investigate risk factors for CVD, and their impact on the ability to work. The participants were in majority male (99.3%) with a median age of 41.2 years (IQR 35.2); 23.7% were smokers, and 27.1% consumed alcohol. The median body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 m/kg2 (IQR 7.1), with 63.1% of participants having above normal BMI. Smoking, BMI, and hypertension findings were in line with national South African data, but diabetes prevalence was far lower. Undiagnosed hypertension was found in 9.4% of participants, uncontrolled hypertension in 5.6%, and diabetes in 3.0%. Analysis by BMI category found that obesity was significantly associated with increased odds of hypertension. Uncontrolled hypertension was the main reason for being deemed 'unfit to work' (35.3%). Our research highlights the need for more regular screening for hypertension and interventions to address high BMI.

Erratum: Unexpected low frequency of respiratory symptoms in an HIV-positive urban sub-Saharan population compared to an HIV-negative control group.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v20i1.1010.].

Unexpected low frequency of respiratory symptoms in an HIV-positive urban sub-Saharan population compared to an HIV-negative control group.

BACKGROUND: Chronic respiratory illnesses and respiratory infections are common in HIV-positive populations. It seems reasonable that HIV-positive people experience more respiratory symptoms, such as coughing and breathlessness, than those who are HIV-negative. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the frequency of respiratory symptoms in an urban African HIV-positive population. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Johannesburg, South Africa, in 2016-2017. Four groups of participants were included: HIV-positive participants (1) not yet on antiretroviral therapy (ART), (2) on first-line ART, (3) on second-line ART and (4) age- and sex-matched HIV-negative controls. Data were collected on socio-demographics, respiratory risk factors and respiratory symptoms. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if respiratory symptoms differed between groups and to identify determinants associated with symptoms. RESULTS: Overall, 547 participants were included, of whom 62% were women, with a median age of 37 years. Of these patients, 63% (347) were HIV-positive, 26% were ART-naïve, 24% were on first-line ART and 50% were on second-line ART. Cough and/or productive cough was reported by 27 (5%), wheezing by 9 (2%) and breathlessness by 118 (22%) of the participants. The frequency of these symptoms did not differ by HIV status after adjustment for age and sex. Breathlessness was associated with age, female sex, obesity, a history of respiratory infection and a history of airway hyper-reactivity. CONCLUSION: The frequency of respiratory symptoms was low in our study population except for breathlessness. HIV-positive participants, whether or not on ART, did not experience more symptoms than HIV-negative participants.