Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cancer ; 12(3): 765-770, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33403034

RESUMEN

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is minimal invasive endoscopic procedure to deal with gastric tumor. Initially, it was developed to resect mucosal neoplasm since 2000 and extended its application to submucosal tumor in the following years. Although the basic ESD skills are similar in gastric mucosal tumor and subepithelial tumor, the success rate, complication may be different between the two types of gastric tumor resection. This retrospective study is conducted to analyze the ESD procedure in gastric mucosal tumor and subepithelial tumor. Methods: From 2007 to 2016, we reviewed all patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric mucosal tumor and subepithelial tumor in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. Results: Totally, 35 patients with gastric subepithelial tumor and 41 patients with gastric mucosal tumor received endoscopic submucosal dissection are enrolled. Among 35 patients with subepithelial tumor, 32 (91.4%) patients achieved curative treatment. 1 patient received emergent operation and 2 patients received salvage operation to complete tumor resection. 8 patients (22.9%) occurred perforation and no delay bleeding was found. Among 41 patients with mucosal neoplasm, 30 (71.4%) patients achieved curative treatment. 2 patients received emergent operation and 9 patients received salvage operation to complete tumor resection. 9 patients (21.9%) occurred complication, 6 patients occurred delay bleeding and 3 patients had perforation. Conclusions: Comparing ESD between gastric mucosal tumor and subepithelial tumor, ESD had similar efficiency in curative treatment. However, ESD in subepethelial tumor encountered higher perforation and lesser delay bleeding.

2.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 15535, 2019 10 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31664063

RESUMEN

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can cause several upper airway symptoms and alter the physiology of nasopharyngeal mucosa, while upper airway diseases in turn might also exacerbate GERD symptoms. For a long time, asthma was considered a risk factor of GERD in the literature. Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are usually identified as united airway disease according to similar epidemiology and pathophysiology; however, the association between AR and GERD is less elucidated. We aimed to evaluate whether AR would increase the development of GERD. Patients diagnosed as AR were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2005 without prior history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The outcome of interest was new-onset GERD. Cox regression models were applied to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) of GERD. We analyzed the data of 193,810 AR patients aged 18 years or older and being free of AR at baseline. The AR cohort (n = 96,905) had a significantly increased risk of GERD over a non-AR cohort (n = 96905) (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.94; 95% CI = 1.88-1.99, p < 0.001). AR may have stronger correlation with GERD than does asthma, although asthma might increase GERD risk by means of certain pathways shared with AR.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Modelos Biológicos , Rinitis Alérgica , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/epidemiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Rinitis Alérgica/complicaciones , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Dig Dis Sci ; 62(12): 3298-3316, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29110162

RESUMEN

The management of proton pump inhibitor-refractory GERD (rGERD) is a challenge in clinical practice. Since up to one-third of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) are not satisfied with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, new drug development targeting different pathophysiologies of GERD is imperative. At present, no other drugs serve as a more potent acid suppression agent than PPIs. As an add-on therapy, histamine type-2 receptor antagonists, alginates, prokinetics and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation inhibitors have some impact on the subgroups of rGERD, but greater effectiveness and fewer adverse effects for widespread use are required. Visceral hypersensitivity also contributes to the perception of GERD symptoms, and neuromodulators including antidepressants play a role in this category. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring helps to distinguish functional heartburn from true GERD, and psychologic medication and cognitive behavior therapy are further therapy options instead of PPIs.


Asunto(s)
Alginatos/uso terapéutico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Esfínter Esofágico Inferior/efectos de los fármacos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/farmacología , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Ácido Glucurónico/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Hexurónicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...