Relationship between gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The relationship between gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA) and Helicobacter pylori infection is not well defined; thus, we retrospectively investigated this relationship. METHODS: We examined 852 cases (646 men) of gastric cancer. GEJA was defined as type II according to the classification system of Siewert and Stein. We compared the prevalence of H. pylori infection and corporal gastritis in GEJA patients with distal gastric cancer. RESULTS: GEJA was observed in 80 (including 6 cases of Barrett's esophageal cancer) of the 852 cases of gastric cancer examined (9.4%). The rate of H. pylori infection was significantly lower in patients with GEJA than in patients with distal gastric cancer (73.8 vs. 94.1%, p < 0.05). The prevalence of corporal gastritis was also significantly lower in patients with GEJA than in patients with distal gastric cancer (80.7 vs. 94.6%, p < 0.05). Concurrent H. pylori infection and corporal gastritis were not observed in patients with Barrett's esophageal cancer. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that GEJA has 2 etiologic types; one of these types is associated with H. pylori infection and resembles distal gastric cancer, and the other one is not associated with H. pylori infection or Barrett's esophageal cancer.

Clinical characteristics of Japanese dyspeptic patients: is the Rome III classification applicable?

OBJECTIVE: While the Rome III classification seems logical, some aspects need further evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of Japanese dyspeptic patients and to determine whether this classification could be applied to them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 364 consecutive patients with a mean age of 54.5 years who had chronic symptoms occurring at least several times per week that could be attributed to the upper gastrointestinal tract were recruited. All of them underwent blood tests, ultrasonography, and endoscopy, which revealed no organic, systemic, or metabolic diseases. They also answered a questionnaire about their symptoms. RESULTS: The subjects were divided into a postprandial distress symptom (PDS) group, epigastric pain symptom (EPS) group, and chronic idiopathic nausea symptom group. There was considerable overlap among these groups (109/198, 55.1%), and patients with non-erosive reflux disease accounted for 52.0% (103/198) of all subjects. The Rome III classification could not be applied to 62.7% of the PDS group and 61.3% of the EPS group because the onset of symptoms occurred less than 6 months before diagnosis (4.6 +/- 0.4 months for PDS and 4.6 +/- 0.5 months for EPS). CONCLUSIONS: The current Rome III criteria for functional dyspepsia dose not adequately identify a large proportion of Japanese dyspeptic patients, primarily due to earlier presentation for medical evaluation. Therefore, the 6-month period after onset of dyspeptic symptoms should be shortened at least in the Japanese population experiencing dyspeptic symptoms.