Effect of Surgical Setting on Hospital-Reported Outcomes for Elective Lumbar Spinal Procedures: Tertiary Versus Community Hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: As hospital compensation becomes increasingly dependent on pay-for-performance and bundled payment compensation models, hospitals seek to reduce costs and increase quality. To our knowledge, no reported data compare these measures between hospital settings for elective lumbar procedures. The study compares hospital-reported outcomes and costs for elective lumbar procedures performed at a tertiary hospital (TH) versus community hospitals (CH) within a single health care system. METHODS: Retrospective review of a physician-maintained, prospectively collected database consisting of 1 TH and 4 CH for 3 common lumbar surgeries from 2015 to 2016. Patients undergoing primary elective microdiscectomy for disc herniation, laminectomy for spinal stenosis, and laminectomy with fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis were included. Patients were excluded for traumatic, infectious, or malignant pathology. Comparing hospital settings, outcomes included length of stay (LOS), rates of 30-day readmissions, potentially preventable complications (PPC), and discharge to rehabilitation facility, and hospital costs. RESULTS: A total of 892 patients (n = 217 microdiscectomies, n = 302 laminectomies, and n = 373 laminectomy fusions) were included. The TH served a younger patient population with fewer comorbid conditions and a higher proportion of African Americans. The TH performed more decompressions (P < .001) per level fused; the CH performed more interbody fusions (P = .007). Cost of performing microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy (P = .014) was significantly higher at the TH, but there was no significant difference for laminectomy with fusion. In a multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis, the TH was significantly more expensive for single-level microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy with single-level fusion (P < .001), but trended toward significance for laminectomy without fusion (P = .052). No difference existed for PPC or readmissions rate. Patients undergoing laminectomy without fusion were discharged to a facility more often at the TH (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: We provide hospital-reported outcomes between a TH and CH. Significant differences in patient characteristics and surgical practices exist between surgical settings. Despite minimal differences in hospital-reported outcomes, the TH was significantly more expensive.

A simple technique for thoracoscopic assisted placement of the distal limb of syringopleural shunts.

BACKGROUND: Syringomyelia is an unusual accumulation of fluid within the spinal cord that may be associated with significant neurologic symptoms. Surgical drainage using various techniques is often required to reduce the intraparenchymal pressure and to alleviate symptoms. Syringopleural shunting seems to produce best results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A simple technique to insert the distal limb of the syringopleural shunt into the pleural space is described in detail. The patient is placed in prone position. The syrinx is accessed from a dorsal incision and the proximal limb is inserted into the fluid cavity. The tube is tunneled through the subcutaneous space laterally and caudally. A 5mm blunt port is inserted lateral to the scapula and advanced under visual control using a 5mm 30° camera through the subcutaneous tissue and muscle and at the upper border of the 5th rib through the intercostals. With ventilation paused, the pleura is penetrated and CO2 is insufflated with a pressure of 8mm mercury. Under visual control the distal limb of the shunt is inserted at the pleural recessus and the tube is directed cranially. Positive airway pressure is applied re-expanding the lung. The trocar is removed from the pleural cavity and the skin is closed with subcuticular sutures. RESULTS: The shunt was successfully placed in three consecutive cases including one redo case (1 male, 1 female aged 50 and 51 years with post traumatic syrinx). Postoperative chest x-ray excluded pneumothorax and no chest tube was required. Neurologic improvement was achieved in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: General surgeons should be familiar with this simple technique similar to laparoscopic assisted placement of distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheters into the abdominal cavity.

Modified Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique Can Potentially Improve Safety of Interbody Graft Placement.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) is a well-described procedure with excellent reported outcomes. A modification of interbody graft placement can potentially improve the ease and safety of this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To describe a modification of the MITLIF graft placement and retrospectively review our experience including intraoperative and postoperative complications. METHODS: Single surgeon, single institution, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent a modified MITLIF technique between November 2011 and December 2013. Hospital records including operative notes and discharge summaries were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical parameters including operative time and estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications including durotomy/cerebrospinal fluid leak, and postoperative outcomes including time before ambulation and length of stay were all reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-three consecutive MITLIF patients; 71 underwent 1-level fusion and 12 had multilevel fusions. Average operative time for single level was 181 min; multilevel was 323 min. Average estimated blood loss was 140 mL. Time before ambulation was <1 d, average length of stay was 1.6 d. There were a total of 4 complications in this series (4.8%). There was zero incidence of durotomy or cerebrospinal fluid leak. CONCLUSION: This modified MITLIF technique of maintaining the medial facet prior to discectomy and interbody graft placement can offer the minimally invasive spine surgeons increased assurance while placing the graft and potentially enhance the overall safety and efficacy of this approach. Surgeons utilizing this approach will have little difficulty utilizing this slight modification.

Stand-alone LLIF Lateral Cage Migration: A Case Report.

Lateral approaches to the lumbar disc space have become popular in recent years with very few reported complications. We report on a rare case of a stand-alone cage migration. A 77-year-old female presented with a right L2-3 radiculopathy that was refractory to maximum medical management. This was secondary to foraminal compression at L2-3 and L3-4 due to degenerative disc disease and levoscoliosis, as well as Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at both levels. A left-sided approach lateral lumbar interbody fusion was performed at L2-3 and L3-4 using a lordotic polyetheretherketone (PEEK) graft (50 mm length x 18 mm width x 9 mm height) packed with demineralized bone matrix (DBM). A contralateral release of the annulus fibrosis was performed during the decompression prior to graft insertion. Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral x-ray imaging confirmed good position of interbody grafts, correction of scoliosis as well as spondylolisthesis, and restoration of disc height achieving foraminal indirect decompression. A routine postoperative x-ray at three months demonstrated asymptomatic ipsilateral cage migration at the L2-3 level with evidence of arthrodesis in the disc space. This was managed conservatively without further surgical intervention. Placement of a lateral plate or interbody intradiscal plating system in patients with scoliosis and significant coronal deformity is an option that can be considered to prevent this rare LLIF complication. Moreover, asymptomatic cage migration may be conservatively managed without reoperation.

Minimally invasive lumbopelvic instrumentation for traumatic sacrolisthesis in an elderly patient.

PURPOSE: We present a novel minimally invasive technique for lumbopelvic instrumentation in selected elderly patients suffering from traumatic sacrolisthesis. An 82-year-old female suffered from sacrolisthesis after a fall. She developed significant low back pain and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy. Preoperative radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging sequences demonstrated the fracture dislocation between S1 and S2 with compromise of the spinal canal. Lumbopelvic instrumentation was sought to offer fixation and allow mobilization; however, open lumbopelvic instrumentation techniques have significant morbidity, especially in this patient population of elderly patients with medical comorbidities. METHODS: A minimally invasive technique employing percutaneous pedicle screws at L5 and S1 coupled with percutaneous S2 iliac screws was employed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The patient tolerated the procedure well without any complications or morbidity. At the last follow-up of 14 months, she was ambulating without assistance with near total resolution of back pain and radicular pain. Radiographs obtained at 8 months' follow-up demonstrated fusion across the fracture line. Although further follow-up data is still needed to establish the durability of this technique in the long-term, this minimally invasive technique for lumbopelvic instrumentation can be considered as an option in elderly patients with traumatic sacrolisthesis, whose need for early mobilization and medical comorbidities preclude the use of an open lumbopelvic fixation procedure.

Spontaneous Subdural Hematoma and Intracystic Hemorrhage in an Arachnoid Cyst.

We report the case of 22-year-old man with nontraumatic intracystic hemorrhage into a middle cranial fossa arachnoid cyst associated with a contiguous subacute subdural hematoma. Arachnoid cysts are benign intra-arachnoidal fluid collections frequently detected incidentally during neuroimaging. Rare complications of arachnoid cysts such as intracystic hemorrhage or subdural hematomas and subdural hygromas typically occur after head trauma. Our review of the literature identified fewer than 30 cases of arachnoid cysts with complicating intracystic hemorrhage and ipsilateral subdural hematomas.

Siphon regulatory devices: their role in the treatment of hydrocephalus.

OBJECT: The management of hydrocephalus can be challenging because of the unique cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics in each patient. Various shunt systems have been developed for the treatment of hydrocephalus. One of the main issues surrounding these systems is overshunting due to siphoning. In this paper the authors discuss the pathophysiology of CSF siphoning as well as the various devices used to treat this problem. The pros and cons of each device are discussed, as are the key differences among them. Future concepts are also introduced with an emphasis on upcoming device designs. METHODS: The authors performed a literature review of articles addressing CSF dynamics, shunting, and regulatory devices. The literature consisted of original research articles, company literature on each device, and patent information. A number of siphon regulatory devices have been developed over the past two decades. Each device has a distinct design, requiring specific techniques of implantation for optimal function. CONCLUSIONS: For the past two decades, a variety of siphon regulatory devices have been used to help deal with CSF siphoning. With the increasing mobility of the population, every neurosurgeon will be seeing patients with older and newer devices. Familiarity with the various devices will assist in the evaluation and care of these patients.