Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.

Introduction: Multiple-choice question (MCQ) creation is an infrequently used active-learning strategy. Previous studies demonstrated that medical students find value in the process, but have minimal training, which may limit potential learning benefits. We therefore developed a process for question-creation that required students to complete in-depth training, in addition to collaborative question-writing and editing. Methods: We created a question-writing workshop consisting of three components: (1) training in MCQ writing utilizing NBME online modules, a practice MCQ-writing session, and a training session, (2) writing MCQs independently after choosing topics from an institutionally generated blueprint, and (3) reviewing and editing MCQs via an in-person session. To understand students' perceptions, we held two four-student focus groups and recorded/transcribed the data. We iteratively reviewed the transcripts to generate a codebook and corresponding themes. We used the focus group data to generate a survey with Likert-scale questions, which we sent to the remaining 10 students and analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results: Eighteen second-year medical students participated in this workshop. Students perceived that question-writing training (3.7/5.0±0.5) and question writing (3.9/5.0±0.3) benefitted their learning. Students perceived that MCQ writing required concept integration (4.1/5.0±0.6). Students described how question writing allowed them to recognize subtle distinctions between therapies and diagnoses. Each MCQ required about 1.5 hours to write and collaboratively edit. Discussion: Our results demonstrated that students perceived question writing to benefit their learning. More importantly, students felt that question writing actively engaged them to integrate content and compare concepts; students' engagement suggests that they learned from this question-writing activity.

'What I Wish My Surgeon Knew': A Novel Approach to Promote Empathic Curiosity in Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Physician empathy is associated with a variety of superior patient and physician outcomes. Teaching physicians to practice empathic curiosity is challenging however, and relatively few efficient and effective methods have been proposed toward this end. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact and feasibility of a novel approach to foster empathic curiosity during surgical training. DESIGN: We used an exploratory qualitative approach for our study. Postoperative patients at a single hospital were invited to participate in brief semistructured interviews to better understand their unmet needs. The interview began with the question, "What do you wish your surgeon knew about you?" We audio recorded and transcribed each patient interview. We then iteratively read the transcripts, applied an inductive approach to coding, and used qualitative content analysis to identify themes. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, an academic-affiliated tertiary care facility. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent general surgery procedures (n = 23) between July and August 2017. RESULTS: Of those who provided demographic information (n = 21), all were male and 95% were white with a mean age of 63.9 (34-77) years. Of these, 33% (n = 7) of patients experienced a postoperative complication. Patients described 3 broad categories of unmet need in the perioperative setting including: (i) being treated holistically and with dignity; (ii) using clear communication and delineating provider roles; and (iii) setting specific and realistic expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Promoting the use of empathically curious questions, such as "What do you wish your surgeon knew about you?" may help surgical trainees to identify unmet needs that are crucial for optimizing surgical care.

Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.

Background: Teaching students how to create assessments, such as those involving multiple-choice questions (MCQs), has the potential to be a useful active learning strategy. In order to optimize students' learning, it is essential to understand how they engage with such activities. Objective: To explore medical students' perceptions of how completing rigorous MCQ training and subsequently writing MCQs affects their learning. Design: In this mixed methods exploratory qualitative study, eighteen second-year medical students, trained in MCQ-writing best practices, collaboratively generated a question bank. Subsequently, the authors conducted focus groups with eight students to probe impressions of the process and the effect on learning. Responses partially informed a survey consisting of open-ended and Likert rating scale questions that the remaining ten students completed. Focus group and survey data from the eighteen participants were iteratively coded and categorized into themes related to perceptions of training and of collaborative MCQ writing. Results: Medical students felt that training in MCQ construction affected their appreciation for MCQ examinations and their test-taking strategy. They perceived that writing MCQs required more problem-solving and content-integration compared to their preferred study strategies. Specifically, generating plausible distractors required the most critical reasoning to make subtle distinctions between diagnoses and treatments. Additionally, collaborating with other students was beneficial in providing exposure to different learning and question-writing approaches. Conclusions: Completing MCQ-writing training increases appreciation for MCQ assessments. Writing MCQs requires medical students to make conceptual connections, distinguish between diagnostic and therapeutic options, and learn from colleagues, but requires extensive time and knowledge base.