RESUMEN
Background: General practitioners (GPs) are reluctant to use codes that correspond to somatization syndromes. Aim: To quantify GPs' views on coding of medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS), somatoform disorders, and associated factors. Design and Setting: Survey with German GPs. Methods: We developed six survey items [response options "does not apply at all (1)"-"does fully apply (6)"], invited a random sample of 12.004 GPs to participate in the self-administered cross-sectional survey and analysed data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses. Results: Response rate was 15.2% with N = 1,731 valid responses (54.3% female). Participants considered themselves familiar with ICD-10 criteria for somatoform disorders (M = 4.52; SD =.036) and considered adequate coding as essential prerequisite for treatment (M = 5.02; SD = 1.21). All other item means were close to the scale mean: preference for symptom or functional codes (M = 3.40; SD = 1.21), consideration of the possibility of stigmatisation (M = 3.30; SD = 1.35) and other disadvantages (M = 3.28; SD = 1.30) and coding only if psychotherapy is intended (M = 3.39; SD = 1.46). Exposure, guideline knowledge, and experience were most strongly associated with GPs' self-reported coding behaviour. Conclusions: Subjective exposure, guideline knowledge, and experience as a GP, but no sociodemographic variable being associated with GPs' subjective coding behaviour could indicate that GPs offer a relatively homogeneous approach to coding and handling of MUPS and somatoform disorders. Strengthening guideline knowledge and implementation, and practise with simulated patients could increase the subjective competence to cope with the challenge that patients with MUPS and somatoform disorders present.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy may be associated with adverse outcome in women with congenital heart disease (CHD). However, data regarding the outcome of pregnancy in women with CHD who receive care in cardiac-obstetric expert units are limited. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed baseline characteristics and outcome of pregnancy in 67 females with CHD who received medical care in our tertiary center for 61 singleton and 6 twin pregnancies between 2009 and 2018. RESULTS: According to the modified World Health Organization (mWHO) risk scale for pregnancy, CHD lesions in 39 enrolled women (58%) were classified as mWHO class I or II, and in 28 females (42%) as mWHO class III or IV. Preterm births were more frequent in mWHO classes III or IV (P=0.003). Cardiac signs and complications occurred more often in mWHO classes III or IV than in women with cardiac lesions assigned to mWHO classes I or II (42.9% vs. 7.7%, P=0.002). N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels during pregnancy were higher in mWHO classes III or IV than in mWHO classes I or II (median 269.0 vs. 115.5 pg/mL, P=0.019). Presence of functional NYHA class III [odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) 8.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-57.2, P=0.008] and mWHO classes III/IV (OR per SD 3.4, 95% CI: 1.2-9.9, P=0.018) prior to pregnancy were identified as independent predictors of adverse cardiac outcome of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse cardiac events and preterm deliveries should be anticipated in pregnant women with CHD, especially in those with mWHO classes III or IV. Therefore, these pregnancies should be under close surveillance and managed in specialized, multidisciplinary tertiary referral centers. Preconception counseling including individualized risk assessment is strongly recommended in women with CHD.
