Fear of the Unknown: The Benefits of a Patient Educational Handout on Breast Biopsy Markers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether providing a biopsy marker informational handout to patients improves patient knowledge and comfort with receiving a marker. METHODS: In this IRB-exempt prospective study, a patient educational handout on breast biopsy markers was developed. A questionnaire was created with four questions asking patients to self-evaluate their knowledge of biopsy markers and their comfort level with marker placement before and after reading the handout. Technologists distributed the educational handouts to patients presenting for a percutaneous breast biopsy under any modality from December 11, 2020, to April 23, 2021. Data from the completed questionnaires were entered into a database. Statistical analyses included paired t-test and Wilcoxon analyses. RESULTS: In total, 141 completed surveys were included in the analysis. The mean scores prior to reading the handout for knowledge and comfort were 2.59 and 3.40, respectively. After reading the handout, there was a significant increase in mean scores for knowledge and comfort (4.26 and 4.20, respectively) (P < 0.001). There was a 64% increase vs 23% increase for knowledge and comfort, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patient-assessed knowledge of biopsy markers increased significantly after reading our educational handout. Patient-assessed comfort with biopsy marker placement also increased significantly after reading the educational handout, though to a lesser degree than knowledge. Although not included in our study, use of an educational handout may impact patient acceptance of marker placement. Future directions may include quantitatively assessing the effect of the handout on time to consent for a biopsy or influence on acceptance of marker placement.

Defining New Metrics in Microwave Ablation of Pulmonary Tumors: Ablation Work and Ablation Resistance Score.

PURPOSE: To investigate pulmonary microwave ablation metrics including ablation work, ablation resistance score, and involution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 98 pulmonary tumor ablations using the NeuWave Certus Microwave Ablation System (NeuWave Medical, Madison, Wisconsin) in 71 patients (32 men and 39 women; mean age, 64.7 y ± 11.5). Ablation work was defined as sum of (power) * (time) * (number of antennas) for all phases during an ablation procedure. Ablation zone was measured on CT at 3 time points: after procedure, 1-3 months (mean 47 d), and 3-12 months (mean 292 d). Ablation zones were scored based on location for pulmonary lobe (upper = 1, middle/lingula = 2, lower = 3) and region (peripheral = 1, parenchymal = 2, central = 3), and the 2 were summed for ablation resistance score. RESULTS: Ablation zone on CT at 1-3 months was significantly smaller in regions with higher ablation resistance score (P < .05). There was a significant correlation between ablation work and ablation zone measured on CT performed after procedure (P < .001), at 1-3 months (P < .001), and at 3-12 months (P < .05). Ablation zone significantly decreased from after procedure to 1-3 months (P < .001) and from 1-3 months to 3-12 months (P < .001), with change from after procedure to 1-3 months significantly greater (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary microwave ablation zone is significantly smaller in regions with higher ablation resistance score. Ablation work correlates to ablation zone with a nonlinear involution pattern in the first year and may be useful for planning before the procedure.

Humoral rejection in pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric heart transplant grafts may fail without evidence of cellular rejection or transplant coronary artery disease. The role of antibody-mediated humoral rejection (HR) in graft failure has not yet been described in the pediatric population. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 103 pediatric heart transplantations performed at our institution from July 1997 to June 2004. Biopsy specimens were evaluated for HR histologically and by immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence staining. Risk factors for HR were determined by statistical analysis. Graft survival curves were constructed and compared for patients testing negative or positive for HR. RESULTS: A total of 358 endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) from 103 pediatric heart transplant patients (age 3 weeks to 20 years; 52% males) were analyzed for HR. Thirty-six grafts (32%) showed evidence of HR. Grafts with a history of HR during the first year after transplant had a 47% failure rate over 3 years, compared with 29% of those hearts with no evidence of HR (p = 0.06). Although patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) appeared to be at greatest risk for developing HR (p = 0.01), patients with positive donor-specific crossmatch data showed a trend toward more significant risks for HR (p = 0.055). Hemodynamic data (including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] and cardiac index [CI]), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), gender matching, recipient age, race of recipient vs donor and pre-transplant panel-reactive antibody (PRA) were not predictive of HR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of HR have increased graft failure rates and overall mortality. Patients with congenital heart disease and positive cross-match results may be at increased risk for HR.