Failure mode and effects analysis to reduce risk of anticoagulation levels above the target range during concurrent antimicrobial therapy.

PURPOSE: A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was conducted to analyze the clinical and operational processes leading to above-target International Normalized Ratios (INRs) in warfarin-treated patients receiving concurrent antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: The INRs of patients on long-term warfarin therapy who received a course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, fluconazole, miconazole, or voriconazole (highly potentiating antimicrobials, or HPAs) between September 1 and December 31, 2011, were compared with patients on long-term warfarin therapy who did not receive any antimicrobial during the same period. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, pharmacists, and a systems analyst was then formed to complete a step-by-step outline of the processes involved in warfarin management and concomitant HPA therapy, followed by an FMEA. RESULTS: Patients taking trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, or fluconazole demonstrated a significantly increased risk of having an INR of >4.5. The FMEA identified 134 failure modes. The most common failure modes were as follows: (1) electronic medical records did not identify all patients receiving warfarin, (2) HPA prescribers were unaware of recommended warfarin therapy when HPAs were prescribed, (3) HPA prescribers were unaware that a patient was taking warfarin and that the drug interaction is significant, and (4) warfarin managers were unaware that an HPA had been prescribed for a patient. CONCLUSION: An FMEA determined that the risk of adverse events caused by concomitantly administering warfarin and HPAs can be decreased by preemptively identifying patients receiving warfarin, having a care process in place, alerting providers about the patient's risk status, and notifying providers at the anticoagulation clinic.

Racial comparison of outcomes and costs for inpatient neutropenic patients: a multicenter evaluation.

PURPOSE: Racial disparities have been reported in the care and outcome of cancer patients. We evaluated whether race would influence the cost and outcomes of inpatient neutropenic cancer patients in a multicenter study from a large health care system in the southern United States. METHODS: Data was collected on all cancer inpatients with a diagnosis code for neutropenia in a 16-hospital system between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2003. Demographics, treatment outcomes, and costs were compared between white and minority patients. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-nine cancer patients (0.29% of all admits) had a diagnosis of neutropenia. Demographics were similar between white and minority patients. However, minorities were more likely to be younger than whites (P = .002). With regards to outcomes, length of stay (LOS), LOS in the intensive care unit, and discharge status were not statistically different. Total hospital, medication, laboratory, radiation, surgery, and respiratory costs were also similar (P > .05), although minorities were less likely to receive myeloid colony-stimulating factors (P = .032) and more likely to have higher nursing care costs (P = .048). CONCLUSION: In light of the escalating reports of racial disparities in cancer care, these minimal differences are encouraging.