Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Spec Care Dentist ; 41(2): 218-227, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280155

RESUMEN

AIM: To examine how physical ability and comorbidity associate with oral health. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised 161 individuals belonging to the Oral Health GeMS study. Outcome variables were the number of teeth with dental caries and deepened periodontal pockets and self-perceived oral health (pain/discomfort in mouth). Physical ability was determined by measuring limitations in daily activities (activities of daily living [ADL] and instrumental activities of daily life [IADL]) and the number of comorbidities with Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI). Poisson's multivariate regression model was used to estimate prevalence rate ratio (PRR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The physical ability or number of comorbidities did not associate consistently with oral diseases, but ADL, IADL and FCI associated all with self-perceived oral discomfort (PRR: 1.74, CI: 1.01-3.03; PRR: 1.20, CI: 1.06-1.35; PRR: 1.20, CI: 1.05-1.36, respectively). Furthermore, IADL associated also with poor self-perceived oral health (PRR: 1.27, CI: 1.03-1.57). CONCLUSION: Older people with impaired physical ability and comorbidities are more likely to have oral discomfort and have poorer self-perceived oral health.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Caries Dental , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Salud Bucal
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 63(10): 1413-1418, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286476

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The analgesic effect on labour pain of either spinal or epidural sufentanil or fentanyl was tested in a total of 80 primiparous parturients at an early phase of the delivery. The aim of the study was to compare the level of analgesia achieved within 20 minutes. METHODS: The parturients were randomly assigned to groups receiving either spinal sufentanil (5 µg), epidural sufentanil (20 µg), spinal fentanyl (20 µg) or epidural fentanyl (100 µg), whereafter the parturients were monitored for reported pain during contraction and side effects for 30 minutes. The primary outcome was the level of analgesia achieved within 20 minutes, while the secondary outcome was the time until the administration of the first epidural bolus. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean maximum pain VAS was 86 (84-89) mm. At 20 minutes after spinal sufentanil, epidural sufentanil, spinal fentanyl or epidural fentanyl, the maximum VAS was 19 (7-31), 45 (32-59), 25 (10-39) or 52 (40-63) mm, respectively (P < .01 spin vs epid groups). There were no differences in efficacy between spinal or epidural sufentanil and fentanyl. The mean (95% CI) time to the activation of epidural analgesia was 151 (111-192), 130 (93-168), 177 (121-234) and 112 (80-143) minutes after spinal sufentanil, epidural sufentanil, spinal fentanyl and epidural fentanyl, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of a reduction of VAS score at 20 minutes, epidural sufentanil or fentanyl provide 63% and 60% of the analgesic effect of the corresponding spinal analgesia. Epidural sufentanil or fentanyl could be used in situations in which spinal/CSE administration is not possible or desired.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Sufentanilo/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Humanos , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA