Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 68
Filtrar
1.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 38(6): 1282-1295, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667524

RESUMEN

Crohn's disease (CD), a form of inflammatory bowel disease, involves chronic inflammation within the gastrointestinal tract. Intestinal strictures and fistulas are common complications of CD with varying severity in their presentations. Modifications in oral diet or use of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) are common approaches to manage both stricturing and fistulizing disease, although supporting research evidence is generally limited. In the preoperative period, there is strong evidence that EEN can reduce surgical complications. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is often utilized in the management of enterocutaneous fistulas, given that oral diet and EEN may potentially increase output in proximal fistulas. This narrative review highlights the current practices and evidence for the roles of oral diet, EEN, and PN in treatment and management of stricturing and fistulizing CD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Fístula Intestinal , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/terapia , Constricción Patológica , Dieta , Nutrición Enteral , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Fístula Intestinal/terapia , Inducción de Remisión
2.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 38(3): 539-556, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847684

RESUMEN

Evidence on perioperative nutrition interventions in gastrointestinal surgery is rapidly evolving. We conducted a narrative review of various aspects of nutrition support, including formula choice and route of administration, as well as duration and timing of nutrition support therapy. Studies have demonstrated that nutrition support is associated with improved clinical outcomes in malnourished patients and those at nutrition risk, emphasizing the importance of nutrition assessment, for which several validated nutrition risk assessment tools exist. The assessment of serum albumin levels has fallen out of favor, as it is an unreliable marker of nutrition status, whereas imaging evidence of sarcopenia has prognostic value and may emerge as a standard component of nutrition assessment. Preoperatively, evidence supports limiting fasting to reduce insulin resistance and improve oral tolerance. Benefits to preoperative carbohydrate loading remain unclear, whereas literature suggests preoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) may reduce postoperative complications in high-risk patients with malnutrition or sarcopenia. Postoperatively, early oral feeding is safe with benefits in time to return of bowel function and reduced hospital stay. There is a signal for potential benefit to early postoperative PN in critically ill patients, though evidence is sparse. There has also been a recent emergence in randomized studies evaluating the use of ω-3 fatty acids, amino acids, and immunonutrition. Meta-analyses have reported favorable outcomes for these supplements, though individual studies are small and with significant methodological limitations and risk of bias, emphasizing the need for high-quality randomized studies to guide clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Desnutrición , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Apoyo Nutricional , Desnutrición/etiología , Desnutrición/prevención & control
3.
Nutrients ; 15(2)2023 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36678187

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with alterations of the fecal and tissue-associated microbiome. Preclinical models support a pathogenic role of the microbiome in CRC, including in promoting metastasis and modulating antitumor immune responses. To investigate whether the microbiome is associated with lymph node metastasis and T cell infiltration in human CRC, we performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing of feces, tumor core, tumor surface, and healthy adjacent tissue collected from 34 CRC patients undergoing surgery (28 fecal samples and 39 tissue samples). Tissue microbiome profiles-including increased Fusobacterium-were significantly associated with mesenteric lymph node (MLN) involvement. Fecal microbes were also associated with MLN involvement and accurately classified CRC patients into those with or without MLN involvement. Tumor T cell infiltration was assessed by immunohistochemical staining of CD3 and CD8 in tumor tissue sections. Tumor core microbiota, including members of the Blautia and Faecalibacterium genera, were significantly associated with tumor T cell infiltration. Abundance of specific fecal microbes including a member of the Roseburia genus predicted high vs. low total and cytotoxic T cell infiltration in random forests classifiers. These findings support a link between the microbiome and antitumor immune responses that may influence prognosis of locally advanced CRC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Linfocitos T , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Heces/microbiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Ganglios Linfáticos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor , Linfocitos T/inmunología
5.
Am J Surg ; 224(5): 1262-1266, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922257

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Large bowel obstruction is an urgent condition which can progress to ischemia and perforation. The importance of prompt intervention has not been rigorously demonstrated. METHODS: Patients with bowel obstruction who underwent stoma, stent, and/or colectomy in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to study prompt intervention (defined as occurring within 2 days of admission). Outcomes were inpatient mortality, discharge to home, and length of stay in an adjusted analysis. RESULTS: Among the 31,277 patients, prompt intervention occurred in 42.6%. In an adjusted analysis, prompt intervention was more likely in higher income patients and less likely in patients with comorbidities; among those with malignant obstruction, less likely in women, and among those with benign obstruction, less likely in Blacks. Inpatient mortality (6%) was not different between groups. Discharge home (71% vs 68%; p < 0.0001) and shorter LOS (-3 days) occurred in those managed promptly. CONCLUSION: Prompt intervention in large bowel obstruction results in decreased LOS and greater likelihood of discharge to home, but not a mortality benefit. Female, Black and lower income patients were less likely to have prompt intervention.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Obstrucción Intestinal , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Colectomía , Stents , Alta del Paciente , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
J Surg Res ; 265: 168-179, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33940240

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colonic stent placement can avoid urgent surgery for large bowel obstruction in selected patients. Population-wide stent utilization patterns and outcomes are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using retrospective, population-based, Nationwide Inpatient Sample data, we studied patients with colonic stents discharged during 2010-2015. The primary outcome was ostomy creation during the same hospitalization. Other outcomes were perforation or peritonitis, and in-hospital death. Associations of outcomes with stent indication were investigated, adjusting for patient-, admission-, and hospital characteristics. We estimated annual population-wide stent use volumes. RESULTS: Of 4257 patients with stent placement (52% male, mean age 64.6 years), 9.9% had non-metastatic colon cancer, 12.9% metastatic colon cancer, 37.8% extracolonic malignancy (ECM), and 39.3% had benign obstruction. In 8.1% of patients, ostomy creation surgery was performed. Perforation or peritonitis occurred in 16.7%, and in-hospital death in 4.5%. Relative to ECM, ostomy creation was several-fold more likely among nonmetastatic colon cancer (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.4; 95%CI, 2.1-5.5), metastatic colon cancer (adjusted OR 2.5; 95%CI, 1.7-3.7), and benign obstruction patients (adjusted OR 3.1; 95%CI, 2.1-4.7). Benign obstruction was associated with high risk of perforation/peritonitis (adjusted OR 3.1 relative to non-metastatic CC (95%CI, 2.1-4.5)). Perforation/peritonitis was highly associated with inpatient death (adjusted OR 6.8 (95%CI, 4.9-9.5)). Annually, about 3,580 patients underwent stent placement, with benign obstruction showing an increasing trend (P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Over 75% of stent placements were done for patients with benign disease and ECM obstruction. Subsequent ostomy creation during the hospitalization was least likely among ECM patients. Rates of perforation/peritonitis in benign obstructions were concerningly high. (22.2%).


Asunto(s)
Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Colostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Stents/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
9.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 25(6): 1512-1523, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32394122

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is increasingly used for proctectomy, but the cost-effectiveness of this approach is uncertain. Robotic surgery is considered more expensive than open or laparoscopic approaches, but in certain situations has been demonstrated to be cost-effective. We examined the cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches to proctectomy from societal and healthcare system perspectives. METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to evaluate one-year costs and outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open proctectomy based on data from the available literature. The robustness of our results was tested with one-way and multi-way sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Open proctectomy had increased cost and lower quality of life (QOL) compared with laparoscopy and robotic approaches. In the societal perspective, robotic proctectomy costs $497/case more than laparoscopy, with minimal QOL improvements, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $751,056 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). In the healthcare sector perspective, robotic proctectomy resulted in $983/case more and an ICER of $1,485,139/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated factors influencing cost-effectiveness primarily pertained to the operative cost and the postoperative length of stay (LOS). In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the cost-effective approach to proctectomy was laparoscopic in 42% of cases, robotic in 39%, and open in 19% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and robotic proctectomy cost less and have higher QALY than the open approach. Based on current data, laparoscopy is the most cost-effective approach. Robotic proctectomy can be cost-effective if modest differences in costs or postoperative LOS can be achieved.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Proctectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
10.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 33(4): e14030, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33174295

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the specificity of a novel anti-human peripheral choline acetyltransferase (hpChAT) antiserum for immunostaining of cholinergic neuronal cell bodies and fibers in the human colon. In this study, we investigate 3D architecture of intrinsic cholinergic innervation in the human sigmoid colon and the relationship with nitrergic neurons in the enteric plexus. METHODS: We developed a modified CLARITY tissue technique applicable for clearing human sigmoid colon specimens and immunostaining with hpChAT antiserum and co-labeling with neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) antibody. The Z-stack confocal images were processed for 3D reconstruction/segmentation/digital tracing and computational quantitation by Imaris 9.2 and 9.5. KEY RESULTS: In the mucosa, a local micro-neuronal network formed of hpChAT-ir fibers and a few neuronal cell bodies were digitally assembled. Three layers of submucosal plexuses were displayed in 3D structure that were interconnected by hpChAT-ir fiber bundles and hpChAT-ir neurons were rarely co-labeled by nNOS. In the myenteric plexus, 30.1% of hpChAT-ir somas including Dogiel type I and II were co-labeled by nNOS and 3 classes of hpChAT-ir nerve fiber strands were visualized in 3D images and videos. The density and intensity values of hpChAT-ir fibers in 3D structure were significantly higher in the circular than in the longitudinal layer. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The intrinsic cholinergic innervation in the human sigmoid colon was demonstrated layer by layer for the first time in 3D microstructures. This may open a new venue to assess the structure-function relationships and pathological alterations in colonic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Colina O-Acetiltransferasa/metabolismo , Neuronas Colinérgicas/metabolismo , Colon Sigmoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Colon Sigmoide/metabolismo , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Adulto , Colina O-Acetiltransferasa/análisis , Neuronas Colinérgicas/química , Colon Sigmoide/química , Sistema Nervioso Entérico/química , Sistema Nervioso Entérico/diagnóstico por imagen , Sistema Nervioso Entérico/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
11.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 25(1): 211-219, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33140318

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has markedly advanced since the introduction of biologic therapeutics, although surgery remains an important therapeutic strategy for both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). This study evaluated how rates of bowel resection surgery and post-operative mortality for IBD have changed over the last decade in the era of biologic therapies. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was queried for patients with IBD (based on ICD-9 and -10 diagnosis and procedure codes) who were hospitalized between 2010 and 2017. Longitudinal trends in bowel resection surgery, urgent surgery, and post-operative mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: During the 8-year period, a total of 1795,266 IBD-related hospitalizations (1,072,110 with CD and 723,156 with UC) were evaluated. There was an increase in the annual number of IBD patients hospitalized, but a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of IBD patients undergoing surgery, from 10 to 8.8% (p < 0.001) for CD and 7.7 to 7.5% (p < 0.001) for UC. From 2014 through 2017, the proportion of urgent surgeries remained stable around 25% (p = 0.16) for CD and decreased from 21 to 14% (p < 0.001) for UC. For CD, the rate of post-operative 30-day mortality varied between 1.2 and 1.6% and for UC decreased from 5.8 to 2.3% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of a nationwide dataset from 2010 to 2017 determined that despite an increase in total admissions for IBD, a smaller proportion of hospitalized patients underwent surgery. A greater proportion of surgeries for UC were performed on an elective basis, and overall the rates of post-operative mortality for CD and UC decreased. The growth of biologic medical therapy during the study period highlights a probable contributing factor for the observed changes.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Colitis , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Terapia Biológica , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/cirugía
13.
Ann Surg ; 272(2): 334-341, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675547

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic colectomy. BACKGROUND: The use of robotic-assisted colon surgery is increasing. Robotic technology is more expensive and whether a robotically assisted approach is cost-effective remains to be determined. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was constructed to evaluate the 1-year costs and quality-adjusted time between robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy. Model inputs were derived from available literature for costs, quality of life (QOL), and outcomes. Results are presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the effect of clinically reasonable variations in the inputs on our results. RESULTS: Open colectomy cost more and achieved lower QOL than robotic and laparoscopic approaches. From the societal perspective, robotic colectomy costs $745 more per case than laparoscopy, resulting in an ICER of $2,322,715/QALY because of minimal differences in QOL. From the healthcare sector perspective, robotics cost $1339 more per case with an ICER of $4,174,849/QALY. In both models, laparoscopic colectomy was more frequently cost-effective across a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. Sensitivity analyses suggest robotic colectomy becomes cost-effective at $100,000/QALY if robotic disposable instrument costs decrease below $1341 per case, robotic operating room time falls below 172 minutes, or robotic hernia rate is less than 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and robotic colectomy are more cost-effective than open resection. Robotics can surpass laparoscopy in cost-effectiveness by achieving certain thresholds in QOL, instrument costs, and postoperative outcomes. With increased use of robotic technology in colorectal surgery, there is a burden to demonstrate these benefits.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/economía , Colectomía/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Laparoscopía/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparotomía/economía , Laparotomía/métodos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 63(8): 1127-1133, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32251145

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perirectal abscess is a common problem. Despite a seemingly simple disease to manage, clinical outcomes of perirectal abscesses can vary significantly given the wide array of patients who are susceptible to this disease. OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to evaluate the outcomes after operative incision and drainage for perirectal abscess and to examine factors associated with length of stay, reoperations, and readmissions. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. SETTINGS: The study was conducted with hospitals participating in the surgical database. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing outpatient perirectal abscess procedures from 2011 through 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study outcomes were length of stay, reoperation, and readmission. RESULTS: We identified 2358 patients undergoing incision and drainage for perirectal abscesses. Approximately 35% of patients required hospital stay. Reoperations occurred in 3.4%, with median time to reoperation of 15.5 days. The majority of reoperations (79.7%) were performed for additional incision and drainage. Readmissions rate was 3.0%, with median time to readmission of 10.5 days. Common indications for readmissions included recurrent/persistent abscess (41.4%) and fever/sepsis (8.6%). Risk factors for hospitalization in multivariable analysis were preoperative sepsis, bleeding disorder, and non-Hispanic black and Hispanic races. For reoperations, risk factors included morbid obesity, preoperative sepsis, and dependent functional status. Lastly, for readmissions, female sex, steroid/immunosuppression, and dependent functional status were significant risk factors. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective analysis and potential selection bias in decisions on hospital stay, reoperation, and readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal outcomes after outpatient operative incision and drainage for perirectal abscesses are not uncommon in the United States. In the era of value-based care, additional work is needed to optimize use outcomes for high-risk patients undergoing perirectal incision and drainage. Strategies to prevent inadequate drainage at the time of the initial operative incision and drainage (ie, use of imaging modalities and thorough examination under anesthesia) are warranted to improve patient outcomes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B229. INCISIÓN Y DRENAJE QUIRÚRGICOS DE ABSCESOS PERIRRECTALES: CUALES SON LOS FACTORES DE RIESGO PARA UNA ESTADÍA PROLONGADA, REINTERVENCIÓN Y READMISION?: Los abscesos perirrectales son un problema frecuente. A pesar que parecen ser una afección aparentemente simple de manejar, los resultados clínicos de la incisión y drenaje quirúrgicos pueden variar significativamente dada la amplia variedad de pacientes susceptibles de sufrir esta afección.Evaluar los resultados después de la incisión y el drenaje quirúrgicos de un absceso perirrectal y analizar los factores asociados con la duración de la hospitalización, la reoperación y la readmisión.Análisis retrospectivo de la base de datos del Programa Americano de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica.Hospitales que participan en la base de datos quirúrgica.Pacientes adultos sometidos a incisión y drenaje quirúrgico ambulatorio de un absceso perirrectal desde 2011 hasta 2016.Los resultados del estudio fueron la duración de la hospitalización, la reoperación y el reingreso.Fueron estudiados 2,358 pacientes sometidos a incisión y drenaje por abscesos perirrectales. Aproximadamente el 35% de los pacientes requirieron hospitalización. Las reoperaciones ocurrieron en 3.4% con una mediana de tiempo de reoperación de 15.5 días. La mayoría de las reoperaciones (79.7%) se realizaron para una incisión y drenaje adicionales. La tasa de reingreso fue del 3.0% con una mediana de tiempo de reingreso de 10.5 días. Las indicaciones comunes para los reingresos incluyeron abscesos recurrentes / persistentes (41.4%) y fiebre / sepsis (8.6%). Los factores de riesgo para la hospitalización en el análisis multivariable fueron sepsis preoperatoria, trastorno hemorrágico, raza negra no hispánica y raza hispana. Para las reoperaciones, los factores de riesgo incluyeron obesidad mórbida, sepsis preoperatoria y estado funcional dependiente. Por último, para los reingresos, el sexo femenino, uso de corticoides / inmunosupresores y un estadío funcional dependiente fueron factores de riesgo significativos.Análisis retrospectivo y posible sesgo de selección en las decisiones sobre hospitalización, reoperación y reingreso.Un resultado poco satisfactorio después de la incisión quirúrgica el drenaje de abscesos perirrectales ambulatoriamente no son infrecuentes en los Estados Unidos. En la era de la atención basada en los resultados, se necesita mucho más trabajo para optimizar los mismos en pacientes de alto riesgo sometidos a incisión y drenaje perirrectales. Las estrategias para prevenir el drenaje inadecuado en el momento de la incisión quirúrgica inicial y el drenaje (es decir, el uso de modalidades de imágenes, un examen completo bajo anestesia) son una garantía para mejorar los resultados en estos pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B229.


Asunto(s)
Absceso/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Recto/patología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Fiebre/epidemiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 62(10): 1248-1255, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesia is important for postoperative recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Multiple randomized controlled trials have investigated the use of transversus abdominis plane local anesthetic infiltration as a method of decreasing postoperative pain and opioid consumption, with variable results. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the overall effect of transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain, opioid use, and speed of recovery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was done with PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials were selected for review. INTERVENTIONS: Transversus abdominis plane local anesthetic infiltration versus no intervention, saline, or other techniques in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries was investigated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was postoperative pain on day 1, at rest or with activity. The secondary outcomes measured were postoperative pain beyond day 1, consumptions of opioid, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Eight clinical trials including 649 patients between 2013 and 2018 were included. Resting pain scores within 2 hours (standardized mean difference, -0.53; p = 0.01), 4 hours (standardized mean difference, -0.42; p = 0.004), and 6 hours (standardized mean difference, -0.47; p = 0.03) showed statistically significant reduction. Six studies including 413 patients demonstrated lower cumulative opioid consumption within 24 hours after surgery (standardized mean difference, -0.82; p = 0.01). Five studies including 357 patients did not show a significant difference in length of stay (standardized mean difference, -0.04; p = 0.82). LIMITATIONS: Local anesthetic used in block varied in type and quantity across different studies. There were heterogeneities in pain score measurements and opioid consumption. Patient populations may be different among studies. CONCLUSIONS: Transversus abdominis block can lead to a lower pain score at rest within the first 6 hours and reduce opioid consumption within the first 24 hours. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A997.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Abdominales/inervación , Anestesia Local/métodos , Colectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Humanos
18.
J Surg Res ; 240: 136-144, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30928771

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernias are common after Hartmann's procedure and add complexity to Hartmann's reversal. Colostomy reversal and abdominal wall reconstruction may be performed in a staged or concurrent fashion, although data are limited as to which strategy is optimal. We aimed to define the complication profile of concurrent abdominal wall reconstruction with colostomy reversal as compared to either procedure alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, we used the National Surgery Quality Improvement Project Database from 2012 to 2015. All patients undergoing elective colostomy reversal, abdominal wall reconstruction with component separation, or combined colostomy reversal with component separation were identified. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes among similar patients undergoing colostomy reversal alone versus combined procedure. Groups were evaluated for postoperative morbidity including reoperation. RESULTS: We identified 11,689 patients; 6951 (64%) underwent component separation alone, 4563 (35%) colostomy reversal alone, and 175 (1%) combined component separation and colostomy reversal. The combined group, as compared to colostomy reversal alone, showed an increased overall complication rate (39% versus 25%; P < 0.01) and increased rate of reoperation (9% versus 5%; P = 0.03). Differences in overall complication rate (43% versus 24%; P < 0.01) and reoperation rate (9% versus 3%; P = 0.03) persisted on propensity matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that in patients undergoing colostomy takedown, concurrent abdominal wall reconstruction is associated with increased morbidity including increased rate of reoperation, even when controlling for patient factors. Consideration may be given to a staged approach.


Asunto(s)
Colostomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Colostomía/métodos , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Proctectomía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Recto/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 62(6): 694-702, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30870226

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colon and rectal lymphomas are rare and can occur in the context of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Evidence-based management guidelines are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the presentation, diagnosis, and management of colorectal lymphoma and to identify differences within the transplant population. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of patients evaluated for colorectal lymphoma between 2000 and 2017. Patients were identified through clinical note queries. SETTINGS: Four hospitals within a single health system were included. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients (64% men; mean age = 64 y; range, 26-91 y) were identified. No patient had <3 months of follow-up. Eight patients (15%) had posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, recurrence, and complications in treatment pathway were measured. RESULTS: Most common presentations were rectal bleeding (27%), abdominal pain (23%), and diarrhea (23%). The most common location was the cecum (62%). Most frequent histologies were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (48%) and mantle cell lymphoma (25%). Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred in the cecum (n = 4) and rectum (n = 4). Twenty patients (38%) were managed with chemotherapy; 25 patients (48%) underwent primary resection. Mass lesions had a higher risk of urgent surgical resection (35% vs 8%; p = 0.017). Three patients (15%) treated with chemotherapy presented with perforation requiring emergency surgery. Overall survival was 77 months (range, 25-180 mo). Patients with cecal involvement had longer overall survival (96 vs 26 mo; p = 0.038); immunosuppressed patients had shorter survival (16 vs 96 mo; p = 0.006). Survival in patients treated with surgical management versus chemotherapy was similar (67 vs 105 mo; p = 0.62). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective chart review, with data limited by the contents of the medical chart. This was a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal lymphoma is rare, with variable treatment approaches. Patients with noncecal involvement and chronic immunosuppression had worse overall survival. Patients with mass lesions, particularly cecal masses, are at higher risk to require urgent intervention, and primary resection should be considered. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A929.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...