Dr. Google to Dr. ChatGPT: assessing the content and quality of artificial intelligence-generated medical information on appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have recently been posited as potential sources of online medical information for patients making medical decisions. Existing online patient-oriented medical information has repeatedly been shown to be of variable quality and difficult readability. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the content and quality of AI-generated medical information on acute appendicitis. METHODS: A modified DISCERN assessment tool, comprising 16 distinct criteria each scored on a 5-point Likert scale (score range 16-80), was used to assess AI-generated content. Readability was determined using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) scores. Four popular chatbots, ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Claude-2, were prompted to generate medical information about appendicitis. Three investigators independently scored the generated texts blinded to the identity of the AI platforms. RESULTS: ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Claude-2 had overall mean (SD) quality scores of 60.7 (1.2), 62.0 (1.0), 62.3 (1.2), and 51.3 (2.3), respectively, on a scale of 16-80. Inter-rater reliability was 0.81, 0.75, 0.81, and 0.72, respectively, indicating substantial agreement. Claude-2 demonstrated a significantly lower mean quality score compared to ChatGPT-4 (p = 0.001), ChatGPT-3.5 (p = 0.005), and Bard (p = 0.001). Bard was the only AI platform that listed verifiable sources, while Claude-2 provided fabricated sources. All chatbots except for Claude-2 advised readers to consult a physician if experiencing symptoms. Regarding readability, FKGL and FRE scores of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bard, and Claude-2 were 14.6 and 23.8, 11.9 and 33.9, 8.6 and 52.8, 11.0 and 36.6, respectively, indicating difficulty readability at a college reading skill level. CONCLUSION: AI-generated medical information on appendicitis scored favorably upon quality assessment, but most either fabricated sources or did not provide any altogether. Additionally, overall readability far exceeded recommended levels for the public. Generative AI platforms demonstrate measured potential for patient education and engagement about appendicitis.

Small Cell Carcinoma of the Rectum-An Unexpected Diagnosis: Current Treatment Options for a Rare and Aggressive Entity.

Rectal small cell carcinoma is a rare and aggressive cancer subtype for which a consensus of optimal treatment has not yet been reached. This cancer presents a difficult surgical problem, and thus, the mainstay of treatment tends to mirror that of small cell carcinoma of the lung (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immune modulators). This brief report highlights current treatment options available for this rare and difficult entity. There is a significant need for large-center clinical trials and prospective studies to help determine the best treatment regimen to effectively care for patients with small cell carcinoma of the rectum.

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy in determining rectal tumor proximity to the peritoneal reflection.

PURPOSE: Treatment of invasive rectal adenocarcinoma is stratified into upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, in part, based on tumor distance from the anal verge (AV). This study examines the correlation between tumor distance measurements (endoscopic and MRI) and relationship to the anterior peritoneal reflection (aPR) on MRI. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was performed at a tertiary center accredited by the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC). 162 patients with invasive rectal cancer were seen between October of 2018 and April of 2022. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for MRI and endoscopic measurements in their ability to predict tumor location relative to the aPR. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients had tumors endoscopically and radiographically measured from the AV. Pelvic MRI characterized tumors as above (intraperitoneal) or at/straddles/below the aPR (extraperitoneal). True positives were defined as extraperitoneal tumors [Formula: see text] 10 cm. True negatives were defined as intraperitoneal tumors > 10 cm. Endoscopy was 81.9% sensitive and 64.3% specific in predicting tumor location with respect to the aPR. MRI was 86.7% sensitive and 92.9% specific. Utilizing a 12 cm cutoff, sensitivity of both modalities increased (94.3%, 91.4%) but specificity decreased (50%, 64.3%). CONCLUSION: For locally invasive rectal cancers, tumor position relative to the aPR is an important factor in determining the role of neoadjuvant therapy. These results suggest endoscopic tumor measurements do not accurately predict tumor location relative to the aPR, and may lead to incorrect treatment stratification recommendation. When the aPR is not identified, MRI-reported tumor distance may be a better predictor of this relationship.

Impact of Frailty on Patient Outcomes after Hartmann's Reversal: A NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colostomy reversal is a common procedure. Patients often have baseline comorbidities associated with postoperative morbidity. We utilized a modified frailty index (mFI-5) to predict postoperative complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective, open Hartmann's reversal were queried from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified to low, medium, or high frailty groups. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared, ANOVA, and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 9272 patients with Hartmann's reversal. 48.78%, 30.31%, and 12.89% had low, moderate, or high frailty, respectively. High frailty was associated with cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, reintubation, prolonged intubation, early reoperation, and mortality. After multivariate analysis, high frailty was associated with prolonged intubation (OR 3.147, P = .001), reintubation (OR 2.548, P = .002), and reoperation (OR 1.67, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty was associated with greater risk of postoperative complications in patients undergoing Hartmann's reversal. Frailty may be a useful adjunct to stratify for patients who are at risk for postoperative complications.

Risk Factors Associated with the Development of Colorectal Anastomotic Strictures Prior to Diverting Loop Ileostomy Reversal.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic strictures represent a major source of morbidity in colorectal surgery with an incidence reported up to 30%. Despite this, the mechanism by which strictures develop remains unclear. This study aims to determine the incidence of colorectal anastomotic strictures and associated risk factors among a series of diverted patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 142 patients over a 7-year period at a single institution after colorectal resection with anastomosis and diverting ileostomy creation re-examined with postoperative endoscopy. One patient was removed due to anastomotic tumor recurrence. Patient and technical factors were examined for significance using chi-square analysis. Logistic regression was used to perform multivariate analysis to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 141 patients, 14.1% (20 patients) developed strictures detected on endoscopy. Strictures were observed in a greater percentage of women than men (21.2% vs 8%, P = .025). 30.6% of patients who underwent resections for diverticulitis developed strictures while those with neoplastic lesions and other indications had stricture rates of 6.8% and 17.6%, respectively (P = .002). Anastomoses performed during a colostomy reversal were associated with a higher stricture rate (OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.37-13.40, P = .012). Anastomoses performed with a 28/29 mm EEA circular stapler demonstrated a significantly higher stricture rate versus a 31/33 mm stapler (OR 7.21, 95% CI 1.23-155.58, P = .045). DISCUSSION: Our data reveal that female sex, history of diverticulitis, anastomoses performed in the setting of colostomy reversal, and smaller stapler size are associated with a higher rate of anastomotic stricture.

The Early Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lung, Colorectal, and Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

OBJECTIVES: During the coronavirus-19 pandemic, experts recommended delaying routine cancer screening and modifying treatment strategies. We sought to understand the sequalae of these recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of screening, diagnosis, and treatment of lung, colorectal, and breast cancer. Data was collected from our institutional cancer registry. Prepandemic (2016-2019) was compared with pandemic (2020) data. RESULTS: Three thousand three sixty one screening chest computed tomography scans (CTs), 35,917 colonoscopies, and 48,093 screening mammograms were performed. There was no difference in CTs [81.0 (SEM10.0) vs. 65.6 (SEM3.29), P =0.067] or mammograms [1017.0 (SEM171.8) vs. 809.4 (SEM56.41), P =0.177] in 2020 versus prepandemic. There were fewer colonoscopies in 2020 [651.4 (SEM103.5) vs. 758.91 (SEM11.79), P =0.043]. There was a decrease in cancer diagnoses per month in 2020 of lung [22.70 (SEM1.469) vs. 28.75 (SEM0.8216), P =0.003] and breast [38.56 (SEM6.133) vs. 51.82 (SEM1.257), P =0.001], but not colorectal [13.11 (SEM1.467) vs. 15.88 (SEM0.585), P =0.074] cancer. There was no change in stage at presentation for lung ( P =0.717), breast ( P =0.115), or colorectal cancer ( P =0.180). Lung had a shorter time-to-treatment in 2020 [38.92 days (SEM 2.48) vs. 66 (SEM1.46), P =0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: In 2020, there was no difference in screening studies for lung and breast cancer but there was a decrease in new diagnoses. Although there were fewer colonoscopies performed in 2020, there was no change in new colorectal cancer diagnoses. Despite changes in guidelines during the pandemic, the time-to-treatment for lung cancer was shorter and was unchanged for colorectal and breast cancer. These findings highlight the importance of continuing care for a vulnerable patient population despite a pandemic.

Refusal of Cancer-Directed Surgery in Patients with Colon Cancer: Risk Factors of Refusal and Survival Data.

INTRODUCTION: Colon cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although there have been numerous advancements in treatment options, electing to undergo surgery is a difficult decision, and some patients may be hesitant to undergo surgery. We sought to understand the risk factors associated with refusal of surgery and predictors of mortality in patients with colon cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients diagnosed with colon cancer from 1995 to 2015. We stratified patients according to whether they underwent surgery or refused recommended surgery. We analyzed numerous demographic, surgical, and oncologic variables and performed univariate analysis to assess predictors for refusal of surgery as well as survival and mortality risk in those refusing surgery. RESULTS: Our analysis included 288,322 patients with primary colon cancer where 284,591 (98.7%) underwent cancer-direct surgery and 3731 (1.3%) refused recommended surgery. Those refusing cancer directed surgery were more likely to be > 70 years old, non-Hispanic black patients, and have distant staged cancer (all p < 0.001). In those refusing surgery, risks for mortality included older age, female gender, widowhood, higher grade or distant-staged cancer, and a positive CEA. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in care related to patient race, gender, and insurance status were related to patients who refused surgical interventions. This study helps to identify patients who are more likely to refuse surgery and may assist in navigating conversations with patients who are contemplating treatment options.

Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Does Not Improve Overall Survival in Anal Cancer Nodal Disease.

BACKGROUND: Anal SCC is a rare disease mainly treated with chemoradiation. Abdominoperineal resection (APR), once the mainstay of treatment for anal cancer, now serves a role as salvage therapy for persistent or recurrent disease after chemoradiation. In addition, clinically positive nodes are currently treated by extending the radiation field to the groin. The role of inguinal lymph node dissection in recurrent or persistent anal SCC is unclear. The aim of the study is to determine the role of inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of inguinal lymph node metastasis for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with anal SCC in the National Cancer Database with positive inguinal nodes undergoing salvage APR between 2004 and 2014 was performed. A comparison of overall survival between patients who underwent APR with lymph node dissection versus APR only was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plot. RESULTS: A total of 3424 patients underwent salvage APR, with 274 (8%) having clinically positive nodes. Within the subgroup that had clinically positive nodes, 195 (71%) underwent APR, whereas 79 (29%) underwent both APR and node dissection. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrates no difference in overall survival in the two groups (P = 0.99). Five-year survival for both groups was similar (36% versus 42%; P = 0.987). No significant difference was found when adjusted for age, gender, and Tumor Node Metastasis staging. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal lymph node dissection does not appear to improve overall survival in patients with advanced-stage anal cancer requiring salvage APR. Proper patient selection for node dissection is essential to spare patients from additional morbid procedures.

Locally Transplanted Adipose Stem Cells Reduce Anastomotic Leaks in Ischemic Colorectal Anastomoses: A Rat Model.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage remains a dreaded complication after colorectal surgery. Stem-cell-based therapies have been shown to increase angiogenesis and cell proliferation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to investigate the use of adipose-derived stem cells on the healing of ischemic colonic anastomoses in a rat model. DESIGN: This is an animal research study using xenotransplantation. SETTINGS: Male Wistar rats (300-400 g, n = 48) were purchased from a licensed breeder. PATIENTS: Adipose stem cells were isolated from the subcutaneous fat of healthy human donors. INTERVENTIONS: The rats underwent laparotomy with creation of an ischemic colorectal anastomosis created by ligation of mesenteric vessels. The animals were divided into 3 groups: control group with an ischemic anastomosis, vehicle-only group in which the ischemic anastomosis was treated with an absorbable gelatin sponge, and a treatment group in which the ischemic anastomosis was treated with an absorbable gelatin sponge plus adipose stem cells. Animals were killed at postoperative days 3 and 7. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anastomotic leakage was defined as the finding of feculent peritonitis or perianastomotic abscess on necropsy. Rat mRNA expression was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Adipose-derived stem cells significantly decreased anastomotic leakage when compared with control at both postoperative days 3 (25.0% vs 87.5%; p = 0.02) and 7 (25.0% vs 87.5%; p = 0.02). The use of an absorbable gelatin sponge alone had no effect on anastomotic leakage when compared with control and postoperative days 3 or 7. We found that stem cell-treated animals had a 5.9-fold and 7.4-fold increase in the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor when compared with control at 3 and 7 days; however, this difference was not statistically significant when compared with the absorbable gelatin sponge group. LIMITATIONS: This is a preclinical animal research study using xenotransplantation of cultured stem cells. CONCLUSIONS: Locally transplanted adipose stem cells enhance the healing of ischemic colorectal anastomoses and may be a novel strategy for reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B203. EL TRANSPLANTE LOCAL DE CÉLULAS MADRE ADIPOSAS REDUCE LA FUGA ANASTOMÓTICA EN LAS SUTURAS COLORRECTALES ISQUÉMICAS: MODELO EN RATAS: Las fugas anastomóticas son una complicación pusilánime después de toda cirugía colorrectal. Se ha demostrado que el tratamiento con células madre aumenta la angiogénesis y la proliferación celular.Investigar el uso de células madre derivadas de tejido adiposo en la cicatrización de una anastomosis colónica isquémica basada en ratas como modelo.Estudio de investigación en animales utilizando xenotrasplantes.Adquisición de típicas ratas de laboratorio raza Wistar, todas machos (300-400 g, n = 48) de un criadero autorizado.Aislamiento de células madre de tipo adiposo del tejido celular subcutáneo en donantes humanos sanos.Las ratas se sometieron a laparotomía con la creación de una anastomosis colorrectal isquémica obtenida mediante ligadura controlada de los vasos mesentéricos correspondientes. Los animales se dividieron en tres grupos: grupo de control con anastomosis isquémica, grupo de vehículo único en el que la anastomosis isquémica se trató con una esponja de gelatina absorbible, y un grupo de tratamiento en el que la anastomosis isquémica se trató con una esponja de gelatina absorbible asociada a un vástago adiposo de células madre. Los animales fueron sacrificados el POD3 y el POD7.La fuga anastomótica fué definida como el hallazgo de peritonitis fecaloidea o absceso perianastomótico a la necropsia. La expresión de RNAm de las ratas se midió usando PCR en tiempo real.Las células madre derivadas de tejido adiposo disminuyeron significativamente la fuga anastomótica en comparación con el grupo control tanto en el POD3 (25% frente a 87.5%, p = 0.02) como en el POD7 (25% frente a 87.5%, p = 0.02). El uso de una esponja de gelatina absorbible sola, no tuvo efecto sobre la fuga anastomótica en comparación con los controles el POD3 o el POD7. Descubrimos que los animales tratados con células madre adiposas tenían un aumento de 5,9 y 7,4 veces en la expresión de VEGF en comparación con el control a los 3 y 7 días, respectivamente; sin embargo, esta diferencia no fue estadísticamente significativa en comparación con el grupo de esponja de gelatina absorbible.Este es un estudio preclínico de investigación en animales que utiliza xenotrasplantes de células madre adiposas cultivadas.Las células madre de tipo adiposo trasplantadas localmente mejoran la cicatrisación en casos de anastomosis colorrectales isquémicas, y podrían convertirse en una nueva estrategia para reducir el riesgo de fugas anastomóticas en casos de cirugía colorrectal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B203. (Traducción-Dr Xavier Delgadillo).

Oral Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal pain management within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols is designed to decrease opioid use, promote mobilization, and decrease postoperative complications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of intravenous (IV) versus oral (PO) acetaminophen within an established ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study. SETTING: This research took place within an established perioperative colorectal surgery protocol. METHODS: A total of 91 consecutive elective colorectal resections performed according to an ERAS protocol using only IV acetaminophen (IV group) were compared with 84 consecutive resections performed using one dose of IV acetaminophen followed by subsequent administration of oral acetaminophen (PO group). Our multimodal pain management strategy also included transverse abdominis plane blocks, celecoxib, and ketorolac medications for both groups. Opioid requirements, maximum and average daily pain scores by the Visual Analog Scale, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in maximum or average pain scores on postoperative days 0-3 or at time of discharge between IV and PO groups. Compared with the IV acetaminophen only group, the PO group received significantly more perioperative opioids through 72 hours postoperatively (68.8 oral morphine equivalents [OME] IV group vs. 93.7 OME PO group; P < 0.0001), were more likely to require opioid patient-controlled analgesia (8.9% IV group vs. 46.4% PO group; P < 0.0001), and were more likely to experience postoperative nausea and vomiting (33.0% IV group vs. 48.8% PO group; P = 0.0449). LIMITATIONS: Significant limitations include the studies' retrospective nature and that it was performed at a single institution. CONCLUSIONS: Restriction of IV acetaminophen within an ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery was associated with increased opioid use, greater need for opioid patient-controlled analgesia, and increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. IV acetaminophen may be superior to oral acetaminophen in the early postoperative setting. KEY WORDS: Perioperative pain management, enhanced recovery after surgery, acetaminophen, multimodal pain control, nonopioid.

Acute kidney injury following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Fluid management within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols is designed to maintain a euvolemic state avoiding the negative sequelae of hypervolemia or hypovolemia. We sought to determine the effect of a recent ERAS protocol implementation on kidney function and on the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: A total of 132 elective colorectal resections performed using our ERAS protocol were compared to a propensity-matched group prior to ERAS implementation. Fluid balance, urine output, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were recorded for all patients, and the incidence of AKI was determined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. RESULTS: Implementation of our ERAS protocol decreased average postoperative length of hospital stay (5.5 vs 7.7 days, p < 0.0001) and time to return of bowel function (2.5 vs 4.1 days, p < 0.0001). The rate of postoperative AKI increased following implementation of the protocol (11.4 vs 2.3%, p < 0.0001). However, by the time of discharge, the average creatinine of ERAS patients who had experienced AKI had returned to their preoperative baseline values (p = 0.9037). Significant univariate predictors of AKI in ERAS patients were longer operative times (p < 0.01) and the diagnosis of diverticulitis (p < 0.01). Within our ERAS patients, AKI was associated with a prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the proven benefits of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, care should be taken during protocol implementation to monitor for and to prevent acute kidney injury.

Success of referral to genetic counseling after positive lynch syndrome screening test.

PURPOSE: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary condition that increases one's risk of developing colorectal, endometrial, and other extracolonic cancers. MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper implemented a reflex screening protocol for DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) deficiency. Those with findings suspicious for LS were referred for genetic counseling (GC). Our goal was to assess compliance with GC and factors associated with successful follow-up. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the MMR proteins MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2 was performed on all colorectal tumor resections from patients ≤70 years old and all stage II cancers. Tumors with loss of MLH1/PMS2 were subsequently tested for BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter methylation to identify tumors with likely epigenetic inactivation of MLH1. Patients with loss of MLH1/PMS2 without BRAF mutations or with absence of MLH1 promoter methylation and those with loss of MSH2/MSH6 were referred to GC. Compliance with GC was assessed. RESULTS: Between March 2014 and August 2016, 203 tumors were tested by IHC. Fifteen (7.4%) patients had abnormal MMR protein expression patterns in the absence of BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter methylation suggestive of possible LS. GC compliance was 35.7% overall and 85.7% in those with family history of LS-associated cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, GC compliance was relatively low in our study. Interestingly, patients with a strong family history of LS-associated neoplasms were more likely to pursue GC. In the future, assessing and addressing barriers to seeking GC will provide opportunities to improve patient care through increased identification of patients with cancer predisposition syndromes.

Thoracostomy tubes: A comprehensive review of complications and related topics.

Tube thoracostomy (TT) placement belongs among the most commonly performed procedures. Despite many benefits of TT drainage, potential for significant morbidity and mortality exists. Abdominal or thoracic injury, fistula formation and vascular trauma are among the most serious, but more common complications such as recurrent pneumothorax, insertion site infection and nonfunctioning or malpositioned TT also represent a significant source of morbidity and treatment cost. Awareness of potential complications and familiarity with associated preventive, diagnostic and treatment strategies are fundamental to satisfactory patient outcomes. This review focuses on chest tube complications and related topics, with emphasis on prevention and problem-oriented approaches to diagnosis and treatment. The authors hope that this manuscript will serve as a valuable foundation for those who wish to become adept at the management of chest tubes.

Fat embolism syndrome.

Fat embolism syndrome (FES) is an ill-defined clinical entity that arises from the systemic manifestations of fat emboli within the microcirculation. Embolized fat within capillary beds cause direct tissue damage as well as induce a systemic inflammatory response resulting in pulmonary, cutaneous, neurological, and retinal symptoms. This is most commonly seen following orthopedic trauma; however, patients with many clinical conditions including bone marrow transplant, pancreatitis, and following liposuction. No definitive diagnostic criteria or tests have been developed, making the diagnosis of FES difficult. While treatment for FES is largely supportive, early operative fixation of long bone fractures decreases the likelihood of a patient developing FES.

Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

The construction of an intestinal stoma is fraught with complications and should not be considered a trivial undertaking. Serious complications requiring immediate reoperations can occur, as can minor problems that will subject the patient to daily and nightly distress. Intestinal stomas undoubtedly will dramatically change lifestyles; patients will experience physiologic and psychologic detriment with stoma-related problems, however minor they may seem. Common complications include poor stoma siting, high output, skin irritation, ischemia, retraction, parastomal hernia (PH), and prolapse. Surgeons should be cognizant of these complications before, during, and after stoma creation, and adequate measures should be taken to avoid them. In this review, the authors highlight these often seen problems and discuss management and prevention strategies.

Is low-molecular-weight heparin safe for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury? A Western Trauma Association multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant risk in trauma patients. Although low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is effective in VTE prophylaxis, its use for patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in blunt intracranial injury. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of LMWH chemoprophylaxis on patients with intracranial hemorrhage caused by blunt trauma. Patients with brain Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or higher, age 18 years or older, and at least one repeated head computed tomographic scan were included. Patients with previous VTE; on preinjury anticoagulation; hospitalized for less than 48 hours; on heparin for VTE prophylaxis; or required emergent thoracic, abdominal, or vascular surgery at admission were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received LMWH and those who did not. The primary outcome was progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated head computed tomographic scan. RESULTS: The study included 1,215 patients, of which 220 patients (18.1%) received LMWH and 995 (81.9%) did not. Hemorrhage progression occurred in 239 of 995 control subjects and 93 of 220 LMWH patients (24% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Hemorrhage progression occurred in 32 patients after initiating LMWH (14.5%). Nine of these patients (4.1%) required neurosurgical intervention for hemorrhage progression. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving LMWH were at higher risk for hemorrhage progression. We were unable to demonstrate safety of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in patients with brain injury. The risk of using LMWH may exceed its benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.