RESUMEN
A challenge with studying cancer transcriptomes is in distilling the wealth of information down into manageable portions of information. In this resource, we develop an approach that creates and assembles cancer type-specific gene expression modules into flexible barcodes, allowing for adaptation to a wide variety of uses. Specifically, we propose that modules derived organically from high-quality gold standards such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) can accurately capture and describe functionally related genes that are relevant to specific cancer types. We show that such modules can: (1) uncover novel gene relationships and nominate new functional memberships, (2) improve and speed up analysis of smaller or lower-resolution datasets, (3) re-create and expand known cancer subtyping schemes, (4) act as a "decoder" to bridge seemingly disparate established gene signatures, and (5) efficiently apply single-cell RNA sequencing information to other datasets. Moreover, such modules can be used in conjunction with native spreadsheet program commands to create a powerful and rapid approach to hypothesis generation and testing that is readily accessible to non-bioinformaticians. Finally, we provide tools for users to create and interpret their own modules. Overall, the flexible modular nature of the proposed barcoding provides a user-friendly approach to rapidly decoding transcriptome-wide data for research or, potentially, clinical uses.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Initiatives such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) have generated high-quality, multi-platform molecular data from thousands of frozen tumor samples. While these initiatives have provided invaluable insight into cancer biology, a tremendous potential resource remains largely untapped in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples that are more readily available, but which can present technical challenges due to crosslinking of fragile molecules such as RNA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We extracted RNA from FFPE primary melanomas and assessed two gene expression platforms -- genome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and targeted NanoString -- for their ability to generate coherent biological signals. To do so, we generated an improved approach to quantifying gene expression pathways, in which we refine pathway scores through correlation-guided gene subsetting. We also make comparisons to the TCGA and other publicly available melanoma datasets. RESULTS: Comparison of the gene expression patterns to each other, to established biological modules, and to clinical and immunohistochemical data confirmed the fidelity of biological signals from both platforms using FFPE samples to known biology. Moreover, correlations with patient outcome data were consistent with previous frozen-tissue-based studies. CONCLUSION: FFPE samples from previously difficult-to-access cancer types - such as small primary melanomas - represents a valuable and previously unexploited source of analyte for RNA-seq and NanoString platforms. This work provides an important step towards the use of such platforms to unlock novel molecular underpinnings and inform future biologically-driven clinical decisions.
