New insights into the coordination between the polymerization and 3'-5' exonuclease activities in ϕ29 DNA polymerase.

Bacteriophage ϕ29 DNA polymerase has two activities: DNA polymerization and 3'-5' exonucleolysis governed by catalytic sites present in two structurally distant domains. These domains must work together to allow the correct replication of the template and to prevent the accumulation of errors in the newly synthesized DNA strand. ϕ29 DNA polymerase is endowed with a high processivity and strand displacement capacity together with a high fidelity. Previous studies of its crystallographic structure suggested possible interactions of residues of the exonuclease domain like the Gln180 with the fingers subdomain, or water mediated and direct hydrogen bond by the polar groups of residues Tyr101 and Thr189 that could stabilize DNA binding. To analyse their functional importance for the exonuclease activity of ϕ29 DNA polymerase we engineered mutations to encode amino acid substitutions. Our results confirm that both residues, Tyr101 and Thr189 are involved in the 3'-5' exonuclease activity and in binding the dsDNA. In addition, Tyr101 is playing a role in processivity and Thr189 is an important determinant in the fidelity of the DNA polymerase. On the other hand, the biochemical characterization of the mutant derivatives of residue Gln180 showed how the mutations introduced enhanced the 3'-5' exonuclease activity of the enzyme. A potential structural conformation prone to degrade the substrate is discussed.

Involvement of the TPR2 subdomain movement in the activities of phi29 DNA polymerase.

The polymerization domain of phi29 DNA polymerase acquires a toroidal shape by means of an arch-like structure formed by the specific insertion TPR2 (Terminal Protein Region 2) and the thumb subdomain. TPR2 is connected to the fingers and palm subdomains through flexible regions, suggesting that it can undergo conformational changes. To examine whether such changes take place, we have constructed a phi29 DNA polymerase mutant able to form a disulfide bond between the apexes of TPR2 and thumb to limit the mobility of TPR2. Biochemical analysis of the mutant led us to conclude that TPR2 moves away from the thumb to allow the DNA polymerase to replicate circular ssDNA. Despite the fact that no TPR2 motion is needed to allow the polymerase to use the terminal protein (TP) as primer during the initiation of phi29 TP-DNA replication, the disulfide bond prevents the DNA polymerase from entering the elongation phase, suggesting that TPR2 movements are necessary to allow the TP priming domain to move out from the polymerase during transition from initiation to elongation. Furthermore, the TPR2-thumb bond does not affect the equilibrium between the polymerization and exonuclease activities, leading us to propose a primer-terminus transference model between both active sites.

Operator design and mechanism for CarA repressor-mediated down-regulation of the photoinducible carB operon in Myxococcus xanthus.

The carB operon encodes all except one of the enzymes involved in light-induced carotenogenesis in Myxococcus xanthus. Expression of its promoter (P(B)) is repressed in the dark by sequence-specific DNA binding of CarA to a palindrome (pI) located between positions -47 and -64 relative to the transcription start site. This promotes subsequent binding of CarA to additional sites that remain to be defined. CarS, produced in the light, interacts physically with CarA, abrogates CarA-DNA binding, and thereby derepresses P(B). In this study, we delineate the operator design that exists for CarA by precisely mapping out the second operator element. For this, we examined how stepwise deletions and site-directed mutagenesis in the region between the palindrome and the transcription start site affect CarA binding around P(B) in vitro and expression of P(B) in vivo. These revealed the second operator element to be an imperfect interrupted palindrome (pII) spanning positions -26 to -40. In vitro assays using purified M. xanthus RNA polymerase showed that CarA abolishes P(B)-RNA polymerase binding and runoff transcription and that both were restored by CarS, thus rationalizing the observations in vivo. CarA binding to pII (after association with pI) effectively occludes RNA polymerase from P(B) and so provides the operative mechanism for the repression of the carB operon by CarA. The bipartite operator design, whereby transcription is blocked by the low affinity CarA-pII binding and is readily restored by CarS, may have evolved to match the needs for a rapid and an effective response to light.