Impact and Efficacy of Topical Dry Mouth Products in Haemodialysis Patients with Xerostomia: A Pilot Study.

Purpose: Previous studies have shown that haemodialysis (HD) patients frequently suffer from xerostomia. This problem is associated with difficulties in oral functions, increased risk of oral diseases and interdialytic weight gain (IDWG). The aims of this preliminary study are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical dry mouth products in treating xerostomia in HD patients and their impact in reducing IDWG. Materials and Methods: We included 25 HD patients that suffered from xerostomia and complied with inclusion criteria. Subjects received toothpaste, mouthwash and mouth gel for dry mouth. The duration of treatment was 4 weeks. Patients filled out a visual analogue scale (VAS) for xerostomia and Oral Heath Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 questionnaires. Clinical data and IDWG were collected of the medical history of HD patients. Questionnaires and IDWG were collected at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment. Results: Twenty-five patients completed the study (56% male and 44% female). The mean age was 63.52 ± 12.50 years. The topical treatment statistically significantly (p = 0.0001) alleviated the symptoms of xerostomia and improved their quality of life (OHIP-14 scores) (p = 0.0001). We observed a statistically significantly IDWG (kg) and IDWG% reduction (p = 0.03) after the use of topical treatment for xerostomia. None of the patients reported side effects. Conclusions: Xerostomia might affect the quality of life and increase the IDWG of these patients. The daily use of topical treatment for xerostomia could decrease thirst and IDWG, improving the quality of life of HD patients. Future randomised studies are needed to confirm these results.

Risk factors associated with xerostomia in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation in Haemodialysis (HD) patients, to clarify risk factors, assess patient's quality of life, and to establish a possible correlation among interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and xerostomia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was performed on a group of 50 HD patients. Data were collected using a questionnaire containing demographic and clinical variables, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for xerostomia, IDWG, and an oral health impact profile questionnaire (OHIP-14). Unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) and stimulated whole saliva (SWS) were collected. RESULTS: A total of 28 HD patients (56%) suffered xerostomia. Dry mouth was associated with hypertension (OR, 5.24; 95% CI, 1.11-24.89) and benzodiazepine consumption (OR, 5.96; 95% CI, 1.05-33.99). The mean xerostomia VAS and OHIP-14 scores were 31.74±14.88 and 24.38±11.98, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between IDWG% and VAS and OHIP total score. Nonetheless, a positive correlation between VAS level of thirst and IDWG% was found (r=0.48 p = 0.0001). UWS and SWS means (determined in 30 patients) were 0.16±0.17 and 1.12±0.64, respectively. Decreased values of UWS and SWS were reported in 53.33% and 36.66% of HD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Xerostomia in HD has a multifactorial aetiology due to accumulative risks as advanced age, systemic disorders, drugs, fluid intake restriction, and salivary parenchymal fibrosis and atrophy. Therefore, it is important to detect possible xerostomia risk factors to treat correctly dry mouth in HD patients and avoid systemic complications