Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anticancer Res ; 39(8): 4215-4218, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31366508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT IORT) is an option during breast-conserving surgery (BCS). No data have yet been published regarding the safety of TARGIT IORT with implants in situ. TARGIT IORT is an attractive option in this context because of the risk of capsular fibrosis following external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We are reporting a retrospective analysis of 16 patients who received TARGIT IORT during BCS for early breast cancer after previous implant-based breast augmentation. TARGIT IORT was performed using the Intrabeam™method. RESULTS: Follow-up varied from 98 to 5 months. There were no procedure-related complications. One patient developed local recurrence after 36 months of follow-up. Among the remaining patients (15/16), no breast-cancer-related events occurred. CONCLUSION: This series of patients with TARGIT IORT during BCS after implant-based breast augmentation revealed no safety concerns and gives some confidence in discussing this option with selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Mastectomía Segmentaria/efectos adversos , Radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Breast Care (Basel) ; 12(5): 318-323, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29234252

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In a previous study our group showed a beneficial effect of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) as an intraoperative boost on overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared to an external boost (EBRT). In this study we present the results of a detailed subgroup analysis of the hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative patients. METHODS: In this cohort study involving 46 patients with HR-positive HER2-negative breast cancer after NACT, we compared the outcomes of 21 patients who received an IORT boost to those of 25 patients treated with an EBRT boost. All patients received whole breast radiotherapy. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49 months. Whereas disease-free-survival and breast cancer-specific mortality were not significantly different between the groups, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall mortality was significantly lower by 21% with IORT, p = 0.028. Non-breast cancer-specific mortality was significantly lower by 16% with IORT, p = 0.047. CONCLUSION: Although our results have to be interpreted with caution, we have shown that the improved overall survival demonstrated previously could be reproduced in the HR-positive HER2-negative subgroup. These data give further support to the inclusion of such patients in the TARGIT-B (Boost) randomised trial that is testing whether IORT boost is superior to EBRT boost.

3.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 31(3): 251-9, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25677840

RESUMEN

Focused ultrasound surgery (FUS), in particular magnetic resonance guided FUS (MRgFUS), is an emerging non-invasive thermal treatment modality in oncology that has recently proven to be effective for the palliation of metastatic bone pain. A consensus panel of internationally recognised experts in focused ultrasound critically reviewed all available data and developed consensus statements to increase awareness, accelerate the development, acceptance and adoption of FUS as a treatment for painful bone metastases and provide guidance towards broader application in oncology. In this review, evidence-based consensus statements are provided for (1) current treatment goals, (2) current indications, (3) technical considerations, (4) future directions including research priorities, and (5) economic and logistical considerations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonido Enfocado de Alta Intensidad de Ablación/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Consenso , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Ultrasonografía
4.
Pathol Oncol Res ; 3(2): 139-141, 1997.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11173642

RESUMEN

A well documented case of a spontaneously curing anaplastic carcinoma in lymph node is presented with a 16 year follow up. Reevaluation and detailed immunohistochemical examination confirmed the original diagnosis of anaplastic carcinoma. This is the first report of a spontaneously curing anaplastic carcinoma which raises the following questions: Was the tumor in the axillary lymph node a metastasis or a primary tumor? Does the anaplastic carcinoma demonstrate the same spontaneous regression characteristics as for example the neuroblastoma?

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...