Prediction of Outcome After Endovascular Embolectomy in Anterior Circulation Stroke Using Biomarkers.

Stroke is a major public health problem that can cause a long-term disability or death due to brain damage. Serious stroke is frequently caused by a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, which should be treated by endovascular embolectomy if possible. In this study, we investigated the use of the brain damage biomarkers tau, NFL, NSE, GFAp, and S100B to understand the progression of nervous tissue damage and their relationship to outcome in such stroke after endovascular treatment. Blood samples were taken from 90 patients pre-treatment and 2 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 3 months after endovascular treatment. Stroke-related neurological deficit was estimated using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission and at 24 h. Neurological outcome was evaluated at 3 months. After stroke, tau, NFL, GFAp and S100B increased in a time dependent manner, while NSE remained constant over time. At 3 months, tau and GFAp levels were back to normal whereas NFL was still high. Tau, NFL and GFAp correlated well to outcome, as well as to infarct volume and NIHSS at 24 h. The best time for prediction of poor outcome was different for each biomarker. However, the combination of NIHSS at 24 h with either tau, NFL or GFAp at 48 h gave the best prediction. The use of biomarkers in the early setting after endovascular treatment of stroke will lead to a simplified and standardized way to estimate the nervous tissue damage and possibly complement the clinical judgement in foreseeing the need of rehabilitation measures.

Heart rate variability monitoring for the detection of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a major cause of impaired outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoidal hemorrhage (aSAH). In this observational cohort study we investigated whether changes in heart rate variability (HRV) that precede DCI could be detected. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with aSAH were included. HRV data were collected for up to 10 days and analyzed offline. Correlation with clinical status and/or radiologic findings was investigated. A linear mixed model was used for the evaluation of HRV parameters over time in patients with and without DCI. Extended Glasgow outcome scale score was assessed after 1 year. RESULTS: In 55 patients HRV data could be analyzed. Fifteen patients developed DCI. No changes in HRV parameters were observed 24 hours before onset of DCI. Mean of the HRV parameters in the first 48 hours did not correlate with the development of DCI. Low/high frequency (LF/HF) ratio increased more in patients developing DCI (ß -0.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.01); P = .012). Lower STDRR (standard deviation of RR intervals), RMSSD (root mean square of the successive differences between adjacent RR intervals), and total power (P = .003, P = .007 and P = .004 respectively) in the first 48 hours were seen in patients who died within 1 year. CONCLUSION: Impaired HRV correlated with 1-year mortality and LF/HF ratio increased more in patients developing DCI. Even though DCI could not be detected by the intermittent analysis of HRV used in this study, continuous HRV monitoring may have potential in the detection of DCI after aSAH using different methods of analysis.

Acute symptomatic seizures and epilepsy after mechanical thrombectomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of acute symptomatic seizures and poststroke epilepsy (PSE) in a well-characterized cohort of patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy. In addition, we aimed to describe the dynamics of blood markers of brain injury in patients that developed PSE. METHODS: Participants of the prospective AnStroke Trial of anesthesia method during mechanical thrombectomy were included and acute symptomatic seizures and PSE ascertained by medical records review. Blood markers neurofilament light (NFL), tau, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients with acute anterior ischemic stroke were included. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission to hospital was 18 (IQR 15-22). Recanalization was achieved in 90%. No patients had epilepsy prior to the ischemic stroke. Four patients (4.4%) had acute symptomatic seizures and four patients (4.4%) developed PSE during the follow-up time (to death or last medical records review) of 0-4.5 years (median follow-up 1070 days IQR 777-1306), resulting in a two-year estimated PSE risk of 5.3% (95%CI: 0.2-10.4%). Blood markers of brain injury (NFL, tau, GFAP, S100B, and NSE) were generally above the cohort median in patients that developed PSE. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PSE after mechanical thrombectomy was low in our cohort. All blood biomarkers displayed interesting sensitivity and specificity. However, the number of PSE cases was small and more studies are needed on risk factors for PSE after mechanical thrombectomy. The potential of blood markers of brain injury markers to contribute to assessment of PSE risk should be explored further. This article is part of the Special Issue "Seizures & Stroke".

Mental fatigue assessment may add information after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Mental fatigue, as part of cognitive dysfunction, has been reported to be common after subarachnoid hemorrhage and it significantly affects quality of life. AIMS OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to assess mental fatigue one year after an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and to correlate the degree of mental fatigue to functional outcome assessed with the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). METHODS: One year after an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, the GOSE was assessed and a questionnaire for self-assessment of mental fatigue, the Mental Fatigue Scale, was distributed to all included patients. The maximum score is 42 and a score of ≥10.5 indicates mental fatigue. RESULTS: All patients with GOSE 8, indicating full recovery, had a mental fatigue score of <10.5. A linear correlation between the GOSE and the mental fatigue score was observed (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a favorable outcome and GOSE 5-7 could benefit from the assessments of mental fatigue in order to receive satisfactory rehabilitation.

Off-hour admission and impact on neurological outcome in endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the new era of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke, one of the main predictors of good neurological outcome is a short time interval from stroke onset to recanalization of the occluded vessel. In this study, we examined the effect of on-hour vs off-hour admittance on the time intervals from stroke onset to recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: One-hundred-ninety-eight patients receiving EVT for anterior AIS between 2007 and 2016 were included. Time of day and weekday for stroke admittance were recorded as well as several time intervals. Age, sex, co-morbidities, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), intraprocedural blood pressure, blood glucose, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score (mTICI) and neurological outcome at 3 months, measured as modified Rankin Scale (mRS), were registered. On-hour was defined as 8 am-4 pm weekdays, and off-hour as weekdays outside these hours and weekends. RESULTS: The time interval from CT (computed tomography) to recanalization was longer during off-hours, while no difference was seen in the time interval from stroke onset to CT. No statistically significant difference was seen in neurological outcome between the on- and off-hour groups in a univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke admittance during off-hours is associated with longer time interval from CT examination to vessel recanalization. The study highlights the need of logistic improvement and probably more resources off-hour in order to deliver an effective stroke care around the clock.

General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: The AnStroke Trial (Anesthesia During Stroke).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Retrospective studies have found that patients receiving general anesthesia for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke have worse neurological outcome compared with patients receiving conscious sedation. In this prospective randomized single-center study, we investigated the impact of anesthesia technique on neurological outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: Ninety patients receiving endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in 2013 to 2016 were included and randomized to general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Difference in neurological outcome at 3 months, measured as modified Rankin Scale score, was analyzed (primary outcome) and early neurological improvement of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and cerebral infarction volume. Age, sex, comorbidities, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, intraprocedural blood pressure, blood glucose, Paco2 and Pco2 modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score, and relevant time intervals were recorded. RESULTS: In the general anesthesia group 19 of 45 patients (42.2%) and in the conscious sedation group 18 of 45 patients (40.0%) achieved a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (P=1.00) at 3 months, with no differences in intraoperative blood pressure decline from baseline (P=0.57); blood glucose (P=0.94); PaCO2 (P=0.68); time intervals (P=0.78); degree of successful recanalization, 91.1% versus 88.9% (P=1.00); National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours 8 (3-5) versus 9 (2-15; P=0.60); infarction volume, 20 (10-100) versus 20(10-54) mL (P=0.53); and hospital mortality (13.3% in both groups; P=1.00). CONCLUSIONS: In endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke, no difference was found between general anesthesia and conscious sedation in neurological outcome 3 months after stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01872884.

Hypotension During Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke Is a Risk Factor for Poor Neurological Outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In retrospective studies, patients receiving general anesthesia for endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke have worse neurological outcome compared with patients receiving conscious sedation. It has been suggested that this is caused by general anesthesia-associated hypotension. We investigated the effect of intraprocedural hypotension on neurological outcome. METHODS: One hundred eight patients with acute ischemic stroke, who underwent endovascular treatment in general anesthesia between 2007 and 2012, were included. Analyzed predictors of neurological outcome were age, sex, comorbidities, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, intraprocedural relative changes in mean arterial blood pressure from baseline, blood glucose, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, and elapsed time from stroke to computed tomography, groin puncture, and recanalization/end of procedure. RESULTS: A fall in mean arterial blood pressure of >40% was an independent predictor for poor neurological outcome (P=0.032), as were higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (P=0.008) and lack of recanalization (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Profound intraprocedural hypotension is an independent predictor for poor neurological outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy in general anesthesia.