Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Med ; 12(23): 21480-21489, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37942566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Subcutaneous (SC) formulation proved to be non-inferior in comparison with intravenous (IV) administration route. This study aimed at assessing the economic and time impact associated with the use of SC versus IV daratumumab in patients with RRMM from the perspective of the hematology center. METHODS: This was a 5-month multicenter time-and-motion cross-sectional micro-costing study conducted in three Italian hematology centers among adult patients diagnosed with RRMM with ongoing treatment with IV or SC daratumumab. Measurements were performed by an ad hoc App. RESULTS: Nineteen (20%) IV and 76 (80%) SC administration procedures were measured. Patients spent a mean of 4.85 ± 0.91 or 1.08 ± 0.56 h in the hematology center to receive IV or SC daratumumab, respectively. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) spent a mean of 49.38 ± 16.13 and 20.37 ± 7.88 min of active working time to manage IV and SC administrations, respectively. The infusion chair was occupied for a mean of 4.85 ± 0.91 and 0.99 ± 0.55 h during IV or SC administration, respectively. On average, considering the costs due to HCP and chair time, materials, and overhead costs, every IV and SC administration costed €80.33 and 34.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, as compared with IV administration, SC daratumumab was associated with 78%, 59%, 80% savings in terms of patient time, HCP active working time, and infusion chair, respectively, and 56.6% budget savings.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Mieloma Múltiple , Adulto , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Italia , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Hematol Oncol ; 36(1): 299-306, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28771763

RESUMEN

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reduce patients' quality of life, increase mortality and morbidity, and have a negative economic impact on healthcare systems. Nevertheless, the importance of ADR reporting is often underestimated. The project "FarmaREL" has been developed to monitor and evaluate ADRs in haematological patients and to increase pharmacovigilance culture among haematology specialists. In 13 haematology units, based in Lombardy, Italy, a dedicated specialist with the task of encouraging ADRs reporting and sensitizing healthcare professionals to pharmacovigilance has been assigned. The ADRs occurring in haematological patients were collected electronically and then analysed with multiple logistic regression. Between January 2009 and December 2011, 887 reports were collected. The number of ADRs was higher in older adults (528; 59%), in male (490; 55%), and in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients (343; 39%). Most reactions were severe (45% required or prolonged hospitalization), but in most cases, they were fully resolved at the time of reporting. According to Schumock and Thornton criteria, a percentage of ADRs as high as 7% was found to be preventable versus 2% according to reporter opinion. Patients' haematological diagnosis, not age or gender, resulted to be the variable that most influenced ADR, in particular severity and outcome. The employment of personnel specifically dedicated to pharmacovigilance is a successful strategy to improve the number and quality of ADR reports. "FarmaREL", the first programme of active pharmacovigilance in oncohaematologic patients, significantly contributed to reach the WHO "Gold Standard" for pharmacovigilance in Lombardy, Italy.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Farmacovigilancia , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
Chemotherapy ; 62(3): 187-191, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28334700

RESUMEN

Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma is associated with poor long-term survival after relapse or resistance to chemotherapy. We report a case of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma refractory to first-line R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and second-line R-DHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin) chemotherapy treatments. The patient achieved remission with single-agent pixantrone, and received a consolidation with high-dose BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. He received consolidation radiotherapy on the site of bulky disease. At 20 months from transplant, the disease is in continuous complete remission. The successful use of pixantrone as a bridge to transplant is highlighted, together with the absence of serious side effects.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Inhibidores de Topoisomerasa II/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Médula Ósea/patología , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Linfoma de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Trasplante Autólogo , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...