RESUMEN
Background and Aim: The optimal imaging test for gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation in non-spine bone metastases has not been defined. The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires accurate target delineation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or 18fludesoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) allow for better visualization of the extent of bone metastases and optimizes the accuracy of tumor delineation for stereotactic radiotherapy compared to computed tomography (CT) alone. We evaluated the interobserver agreement in GTV of non-spine bone metastases in a single center and compared MRI and/or 18FDG-PET and CT in GTV delineation. Methods: Anonymous CT and MRI and/or 18FDG-PET obtained from 10 non-spine bone metastases were analyzed by six radiation oncologists at our center. Images acquired by CT and MRI and/or 18FDG-PET were used to delineate 10 GTVs of non-spine bone metastases in the pelvis, extremities, and skull. The cases showed different characteristics: blastic and lytic metastases, and different primary cancers (lung, breast, prostate, rectum, urothelial, and biliary). In both CT and MRI and/or 18FDG-PET, the GTV volumes were compared. The index of agreement was evaluated according to Landis and Koch protocol. Results: The GTV volume as defined on MRI was in all cases larger or at least as large as the GTV volume on CT (P=0.25). The median GTV volume on MRI was 3.15 cc (0.027-70.64 cc) compared to 2.8 cc on CT (0.075-77.95 cc). Interobserver variance and standard deviation were lower in CT than MRI (576.3 vs. 722.2 and 24.0 vs. 26.9, respectively). The level of agreement was fair (kappa=0.36) between CT and MRI. The median GTV volume on 18FDG-PET in five patients was 5.8 cc (0.46-64.17 cc), compared to 4.1 cc on CT (0.99-54.2 cc) (P=0.236). Interobserver variance and standard deviation in CT, MRI, and 18FDG-PET were 576.3 versus 722.2 versus 730.5 and 24 versus 26.9 versus 27.0, respectively. The level of agreement was slight (kappa=0.08) between CT and 18FDG-PET. Conclusions: Interobserver variance in non-spine bone metastases was equal when MRI and PET were compared to CT. CT was associated with the lowest variance and standard deviation. Compared to CT GTVs, the GTVs rendered from MRI images had fair agreement, while the GTVs rendered from 18FDG-PET had only slight agreement. Relevance for Patients: The delimitation of the treatment volume in non-spine bone metastases with SBRT is important for the results determining its efficacy. It is therefore essential to know the variability and to manage it to achieve the highest quality of treatment.
RESUMEN
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows high doses of radiation to be administered in a limited number of fractions. The high doses per session might allow the theoretical radioresistance of renal carcinoma to be overcome. SBRT may be a therapeutic alternative in inoperable patients with localized renal carcinoma. This review studied the available literature on the use of SBRT in inoperable localized renal carcinoma. The review including data from English-language studies was conducted in PubMed and MEDLINE between January 2010 and December 2020. Articles were included with data from patients with renal carcinoma treated with SBRT, their indications, simulation, dose and fractionation, local control, survival and side effects, comparison with other treatments, response assessment and radioimmunotherapy. The articles included were evaluated for content and validation. The immobilization systems were variable between studies. Doses and fractions were variable from 25-26 Gy in single fractions to 21-48 Gy in 3-5 fractions, with local control being around 90% with a low rate of side-effects. We review the state of the art in SBRT for renal cell carcinoma. More research is needed to determine optimal doses and fractionation, and to develop a reliable response assessment tool. The role of radioimmunotherapy in renal carcinoma is being studied.
