Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Nat Biotechnol ; 39(9): 1129-1140, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34504351

RESUMEN

Assessing the reproducibility, accuracy and utility of massively parallel DNA sequencing platforms remains an ongoing challenge. Here the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) Next-Generation Sequencing Study benchmarks the performance of a set of sequencing instruments (HiSeq/NovaSeq/paired-end 2 × 250-bp chemistry, Ion S5/Proton, PacBio circular consensus sequencing (CCS), Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION/MinION, BGISEQ-500/MGISEQ-2000 and GS111) on human and bacterial reference DNA samples. Among short-read instruments, HiSeq 4000 and X10 provided the most consistent, highest genome coverage, while BGI/MGISEQ provided the lowest sequencing error rates. The long-read instrument PacBio CCS had the highest reference-based mapping rate and lowest non-mapping rate. The two long-read platforms PacBio CCS and PromethION/MinION showed the best sequence mapping in repeat-rich areas and across homopolymers. NovaSeq 6000 using 2 × 250-bp read chemistry was the most robust instrument for capturing known insertion/deletion events. This study serves as a benchmark for current genomics technologies, as well as a resource to inform experimental design and next-generation sequencing variant calling.


Asunto(s)
Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/normas , Disparidad de Par Base , Benchmarking , ADN/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Genoma Bacteriano , Genoma Humano , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA