Perceptions and satisfaction of patients with chronic heart failure when using a remote monitoring web application named Satelia® Cardio.

INTRODUCTION: The use of telehealth, such as remote patient monitoring (RPM), for chronic heart failure (CHF) impacts patient pathways. Patient-centricity in chronic disease management is valuable. Even though RPM is recommended in practice, the evaluation of patient satisfaction has been limited to date. The objective of this study was to assess the perceptions and satisfaction of patients with CHF when using RPM. METHODS: A voluntary declarative survey was conducted with users of Satelia® Cardio, an RPM web application which was included in an experimental model program in France funded by the ETAPES program initiative sponsored by the French Ministry of Health. Monitoring was based on patient-reported outcomes (seven questions on symptoms, one question on weight) which were answered online (digitally literate patients) or by phone with a nurse (patients with poor digital literacy). The survey included questions on perceived usefulness, ease of use and impact on quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Overall, 87% of the 825 patients were satisfied with having their CHF digitally monitored. Patients found that the application was easy to use (94%), problem free (95%), provided well-timed notifications (98%), easily accessible (96.5%), understandable (89%), and did not require an unreasonable amount of time to answer questions (99%). Most patients felt that RPM helped physicians provide better care during their follow-ups (70%, mean score: 7.98/10) and 45% of the digitally literate patients indicated an improved QoL. CONCLUSION: Poor digitally literate patients may need human-based or assisted RPM. Patients monitored daily for CHF through RPM expressed strong satisfaction and acceptance.

PRADOC: a trial on the efficiency of a transition care management plan for hospitalized patients with heart failure in France.

AIMS: Transition care programmes are designed to improve coordination of care between hospital and home. For heart failure patients, meta-analyses show a high efficacy but with moderate evidence level. Moreover, difficulties for implementation of such programmes limit their extrapolation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed a mixed-method study to assess the implementation of the PRADO-IC, a nationwide transition programme that aims to be offered to every patient with heart failure in France. This programme consists essentially in an administrative assistance to schedule follow-up visits and in a nurse follow-up during 2 to 6 months and aims to reduce the annual heart failure readmission rate by 30%. This study assessed three quantitative aims: the cost to avoid a readmission for heart failure within 1 year (primary aim, intended sample size 404 patients), clinical care pathways, and system economic outcomes; and two qualitative aims: perceived problems and benefits of the PRADO-IC. All analyses will be gathered at the end of study for a joint interpretation. Strengths of this study design are the randomized controlled design, the population included in six centres with low motivation bias, the primary efficiency analysis, the secondary efficacy analyses on care pathway and clinical outcomes, and the joint qualitative analysis. Limits are the heterogeneity of centres and of intervention in a control group and parallel development of other new therapeutic interventions in this field. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study may help decision-makers to support an administratively managed transition programme.

Telemonitoring versus standard care in heart failure: a randomised multicentre trial.

AIMS: The aim was to assess the effect of a telemonitoring programme vs. standard care (SC) in preventing all-cause deaths or unplanned hospitalisations in heart failure (HF) at 18 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: OSICAT was a randomised, multicentre, open-label French study in 937 patients hospitalised for acute HF ≤12 months before inclusion. Patients were randomised to telemonitoring (daily body weight measurement, daily recording of HF symptoms, and personalised education) (n = 482) or to SC (n = 455). Mean ± standard deviation number of events for the primary outcome was 1.30 ± 1.85 for telemonitoring and 1.46 ± 1.98 for SC [rate ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.23; P = 0.80]. In New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV HF, median time to all-cause death or first unplanned hospitalisation was 82 days in the telemonitoring group and 67 days in the SC group (P = 0.03). After adjustment for known predictive factors, telemonitoring was associated with a 21% relative risk reduction in first unplanned hospitalisation for HF [hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-0.99; P = 0.044); the relative risk reduction was 29% in patients with NYHA class III or IV HF (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95; P = 0.02), 38% in socially isolated patients (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.98; P = 0.043), and 37% in patients who were ≥70% adherent to body weight measurement (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.88; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Telemonitoring did not result in a significantly lower rate of all-cause deaths or unplanned hospitalisations in HF patients. The pre-specified subgroup results suggest the telemonitoring approach improves clinical outcomes in selected populations but need further confirmation.

Prescription of cardiovascular drugs in the French ODIN cohort of heart failure patients according to age and type of chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a frequent severe disease. Disease-management programmes, which contain a therapeutic patient education component, will play a central role in improving delivery of care and reducing mortality and hospitalizations for CHF. AIMS: In order to have an up-to-date overview of medical treatment of CHF in France implemented by hospital and clinic cardiologists especially interested in CHF and therapeutic patient education, we described the prescription of cardiovascular drugs in the large ODIN cohort of CHF patients, according to age and type of CHF. METHODS: From 2007 to 2010 (median follow-up 27.2 months), CHF patients were prospectively enrolled in a multicentre 'real-world' French cohort by centres previously trained in therapeutic patient education. Patients were grouped according to age (< 60 years, 60 to<70 years, 70 to<80 years and ≥ 80 years) and type of CHF (characterized by level of LVEF: reduced, borderline or preserved). Medical prescription was described and mortality was assessed at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 3237 patients (67.6 years; 69.4% men). The oldest age group had the highest LVEF. Blockers of the angiotensin-aldosterone system were prescribed progressively and significantly less frequently as the population advanced in age or as LVEF was more preserved. The mean dosages of the main prescribed CHF drugs remained ≥ 50% lower than those recommended for most drugs in all age and LVEF groups. Drug prescriptions were related to aetiology of reduced or preserved CHF. A global decrease in CHF drug prescription was observed for all medication classes except calcium blockers, according to maintenance of relatively or totally preserved LVEF. Survival was related to age but not to type of CHF. CONCLUSION: In CHF, and despite management by cardiologists particularly interested in CHF and specifically trained to deliver therapeutic patient education, medical prescription differed substantially from guidelines. Age and type of CHF (reduced versus preserved) appeared to be important factors in lack of adherence to guidelines. However, only age influenced mortality; the type of CHF did not affect survival.