RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The introduction of CDK 4/6 inhibitors for breast cancer patients has contributed to increased ambulatory patient visits for oncologists. The Medication Assessment by Pharmacist program aims to evaluate the impact of oncology pharmacists performing medication assessment follow-up visits. METHODS: Breast cancer patients on a CDK 4/6 inhibitor deemed suitable by their oncologist for pharmacist assessment could be booked for a pharmacist medication assessment appointment at alternate treatment cycles. RESULTS: Between February 2019 to November 2021, 29 of 128 patients (22.7%) were selected for 46 total Medication Assessment by Pharmacist visits resulting in 920â min of clinic time savings for physicians. There were similar rates of adhering to provincial protocols for scheduling visits (99% vs. 96%, p = 0.12) and monitoring investigations (98% vs. 98%, p = 0.96) between those enrolled in Medication Assessment by Pharmacist or not. Surveys completed by medical oncologists and pharmacists demonstrated that nine of nine oncologists felt Medication Assessment by Pharmacist reduced workload and wanted Medication Assessment by Pharmacist expanded to additional oncology drugs. Pharmacist-completed surveys revealed that nine of nine pharmacists felt Medication Assessment by Pharmacist increased job satisfaction, and allowed further application of clinical skills. All agreed that patients were receptive to meeting with pharmacists. According to survey results, 33% of oncologists versus 100% of pharmacists routinely asked about medication adherence, new medications or supplements. CONCLUSION: Integrating pharmacists into a shared care model reduces ambulatory patient visits for oncologists without deviating from provincial protocol guidelines for monitoring and visits for patients on CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Leveraging the medication expertise of pharmacists also increases the frequency of addressing medication adherence and concurrent therapies. Medication Assessment by Pharmacist may be an effective strategy in alleviating projected shortages of oncology providers.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cancer drug therapy costs continue to rise and threaten the sustainability of Canada's public healthcare system. Previous studies have calculated potential savings utilizing different dosing regimens of cancer treatments. Our objectives were to determine the financial impact of drug wastage and to explore cost-effective dosing regimens for pembrolizumab. METHODS: This was a retrospective study reviewing data for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma patients at all six BC Cancer Regional Centres during fiscal years 2017 and 2018. Pembrolizumab waste amounts recorded in pharmacy wastage logs were totalled. Estimates of the number of vials used were compared between vial sharing and non-vial sharing practices to determine the cost differences. Costs for dosing regimens used during fiscal years 2017 and 2018 were compared to 2 mg/kg weight-based dosing (to a maximum of 200 mg), 2 mg/kg dosing rounding down within 5% and 10%, and flat dosing of 200 mg. RESULTS: There were a total of 202 non-small cell lung cancer and 182 melanoma patients with 2948 doses dispensed. Documented wastage was valued at $1,829,047.44 (8.65%) and across all six centres, vial sharing could reduce costs by $3,207,600.00 using the 100 mg vials. Compared to fiscal years 2017 and 2018, 2 mg/kg dosing (to a maximum of 200 mg) was the most cost-effective, decreasing costs by $222,719.20; flat dosing of 200 mg was the most expensive, increasing costs by $6,625,260.40. CONCLUSIONS: Having smaller vial sizes, practicing vial sharing, and using weight-based dosing all improve cost savings. Further investigations on the allocation of resources to optimize drug use and minimize wastage are needed.
