Ensuring access to innovative therapies for children, adolescents, and young adults across Canada: The single patient study experience.

Innovative therapeutic approaches are needed to alleviate the burden of life-limiting, rare, and chronic conditions affecting children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA). This includes a need for improved access to both clinical research and to non-approved or off-label therapies, together with, ultimately, more therapies achieving regulatory approval in Canada. The single patient study (SPS), also known as an open label individual patient (OLIP) study, was introduced by Health Canada to open access to non-marketed drugs where a clinical trial is not readily available, but the drug is considered too investigational to be managed on a standard Special Access Program. SPS is designed for patients who have a serious or life-threatening condition and have exhausted available treatment options. Our report summarizes this relatively new development in the Canadian regulatory environment and highlights the opportunities and challenges as identified by regulators, pharmaceutical representatives, academic researchers, and patient/parent advocates.

Doxapram versus placebo in preterm newborns: a study protocol for an international double blinded multicentre randomized controlled trial (DOXA-trial).

BACKGROUND: Apnoea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses among preterm infants. AOP often leads to hypoxemia and bradycardia which are associated with an increased risk of death or disability. In addition to caffeine therapy and non-invasive respiratory support, doxapram might be used to reduce hypoxemic episodes and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation in preterm infants, thereby possibly improving their long-term outcome. However, high-quality trials on doxapram are lacking. The DOXA-trial therefore aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of doxapram compared to placebo in reducing the composite outcome of death or severe disability at 18 to 24 months corrected age. METHODS: The DOXA-trial is a double blinded, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in the Netherlands, Belgium and Canada. A total of 396 preterm infants with a gestational age below 29 weeks, suffering from AOP unresponsive to non-invasive respiratory support and caffeine will be randomized to receive doxapram therapy or placebo. The primary outcome is death or severe disability, defined as cognitive delay, cerebral palsy, severe hearing loss, or bilateral blindness, at 18-24 months corrected age. Secondary outcomes are short-term neonatal morbidity, including duration of mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and necrotising enterocolitis, hospital mortality, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics and cost-effectiveness. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: Doxapram has the potential to improve neonatal outcomes by improving respiration, but the safety concerns need to be weighed against the potential risks of invasive mechanical ventilation. It is unknown if the use of doxapram improves the long-term outcome. This forms the clinical equipoise of the current trial. This international, multicentre trial will provide the needed high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of doxapram in the treatment of AOP in preterm infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04430790 and EUDRACT 2019-003666-41. Prospectively registered on respectively June and January 2020.

Prospective assessment of inter-rater reliability of a neonatal adverse event severity scale.

Introduction: To ensure the quality of clinical trial safety data, universal data standards are required. In 2019 the International Neonatal Consortium (INC) published a neonatal adverse event severity scale (NAESS) to standardize the reporting of adverse event (AE) severity. In this study the reliability of AE severity grading with INC NAESS was prospectively assessed in a real-world setting. Methods: Severity of AEs was assessed by two independent observers at each of four centers across the world. In each center two series of 30 neonatal adverse events were assessed by both observers: in a first phase with a generic (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE) severity scale not specific to neonates, and in a second phase with INC NAESS (after a structured training). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to express inter-rater agreement in both phases, and bootstrap sampling was used to compare them. Results: 120 AEs were included in each of both phases. The ICC with the use of INC NAESS in phase 2 was 0.69. This represents a significant but modest improvement in comparison to the initial ICC of 0.66 in phase 1 (confidence interval of ratio of ICC in phase 2 to phase 1 = 1.005-1.146; excludes 1). The ICC was higher for those AEs for which a diagnosis specific AE severity table was available in INC NAESS (ICC 0.80). Discussion: Good inter-rater reliability of the INC NAESS was demonstrated in four neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across the globe. The ICC is comparable to what is reported for scales with similar purposes in different populations. There is a modest, but significant, improvement in inter-rater agreement in comparison to the naïve phase without INC NAESS. The better performance when reviewers use AE-specific NAESS tables highlights the need to expand the number of AEs that are covered by specific criteria in the current version of INC NAESS.

Availability of Safe and Effective Therapeutic Options to Pregnant and Lactating Individuals Following the United States Food and Drug Administration Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the extent and type of pregnancy and lactation data of newly approved prescription drugs and assess whether the presented recommendations are data-driven, as required by the US Food and Drug Administration Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule implemented in 2015. STUDY DESIGN: In this descriptive analysis, we reviewed pregnancy and lactation data of all new molecular entities approved between 2001 and 2020 in their most updated labeling. Information was collected regarding the pregnancy and lactation risk statements, the source of pregnancy and lactation data, and the design and methods of pregnancy and lactation studies in the labeling. RESULTS: Of the 422 new molecular entities, the key advisory statement for use of 133 (32%) drugs in pregnancy and 194 (46%) drugs in lactation were classified as "against use." Less than 2% of all drugs had a key advisory statement that supported their use during pregnancy or lactation. The sources of data regarding use in pregnancy were studies in human and animals in 46 (11%) and 348 (82%) drugs, respectively. For use during lactation, data included studies in human and animals in 23 (5%) and 251 (59%) drugs, respectively. The key advisory recommendation was consistent with the available human information in 4 (8%) drugs in pregnancy and 3 (13%) drugs in lactation. Prescription drug labeling contains limited data to support informed decision-making for the use of prescription drugs during pregnancy/lactation. Close collaboration among stakeholders is required to enhance the availability of data in this population.

Technical Update No. 439: Antenatal Corticosteroids at Late Preterm Gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To update recommendations for administration of antenatal corticosteroids in the late preterm period. TARGET POPULATION: Pregnant individuals at risk of preterm birth from 340 to 366 weeks gestation. OPTIONS: Administration or non-administration of a single course of antenatal corticosteroids at 340 to 366 weeks gestation. OUTCOMES: Neonatal morbidity (respiratory distress, hypoglycemia), long-term neurodevelopment, and other long-term outcomes (growth, cardiac/metabolic, respiratory). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Administration of antenatal corticosteroids from 340 to 366 weeks gestation decreases the risk of neonatal respiratory distress but increases the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. The long-term impacts of antenatal corticosteroid administration from 340 to 366 weeks gestation are uncertain. EVIDENCE: For evidence on the neonatal effects of antenatal corticosteroid administration at late preterm gestation, we summarized evidence from the 2020 Cochrane review of antenatal corticosteroids and combined this with evidence from published randomized trials identified by searching Ovid MEDLINE from January 1, 2020, to May 11, 2022. Given the absence of direct evidence on the impact of late preterm antenatal corticosteroid administration on neurodevelopmental outcomes, we summarized evidence on the impact of antenatal corticosteroids across gestational ages on neurodevelopmental outcomes using the following sources: (1) the 2020 Cochrane review; and (2) evidence obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from inception to January 5, 2022. We did not apply date or language restrictions. Given the absence of direct evidence on the impact of late preterm antenatal corticosteroid administration on other long-term outcomes, we summarized evidence on the impact of antenatal corticosteroids across gestational ages on other long-term outcomes by combining findings from the 2020 Cochrane review with evidence obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE for observational studies related to long-term cardiometabolic, respiratory, and growth effects of antenatal corticosteroids from inception to October 22, 2021. We reviewed reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews for additional references. See Appendix A for search terms and summaries. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix B (Tables B1 for definitions and B2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: Maternity care providers, including midwives, family physicians, and obstetricians. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Pediatric Clinical Research Networks: Role in Accelerating Development of Therapeutics in Children.

BACKGROUND: Recent decades have seen many advances in policy and legislation that support the development of drugs used by neonates, infants, children, and young people. This review summarizes the characteristics and performance of networks capable of conducting studies needed to meet regulatory requirements and make advances in pediatric drug development. METHODS: Description of network goals and capabilities by network leaders. RESULTS: In the United States, Europe, Japan, and Canada, clinical research networks have been organized to meet the needs of biopharmaceutical and academic sponsors for timely access to high-quality sites, as well as to provide advice about drug development with regard to strategic and operational feasibility. Each network addresses the specificities of its context while working toward shared principles including standards and timelines; alignment of goals and processes, while not disturbing arrangements for conducting trials that work well; wide geographic coverage; all age groups and pediatric conditions; sources of funding; sites that compete on performance; performance monitoring for benchmarking, and opportunities to optimize the allocation of resources; and education and training for network members. Facilitation in interactions among these networks is based on a single point-of-contact for each; similar approaches to strategic and operational feasibility assessment, and site selection; and collaborative approaches to education and training. CONCLUSION: Within five years, clinical research networks will support the needs of biopharmaceutical and publicly funded pediatric drug development through locally appropriate and globally interoperable approaches.

Maternal High-Dose DHA Supplementation and Neurodevelopment at 18-22 Months of Preterm Children.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether maternal supplementation with high-dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in breastfed, very preterm neonates improves neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age (CA). METHODS: Planned follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to compare neurodevelopmental outcomes in breastfed, preterm neonates born before 29 weeks' gestational age (GA). Lactating mothers were randomized to receive either DHA-rich algae oil or a placebo within 72 hours of delivery until 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development third edition (Bayley-III) at 18 to 22 months' CA. Planned subgroup analyses were conducted for GA (<27 vs ≥27 weeks' gestation) and sex. RESULTS: Among the 528 children enrolled, 457 (86.6%) had outcomes available at 18 to 22 months' CA (DHA, N = 234, placebo, N = 223). The mean differences in Bayley-III between children in the DHA and placebo groups were -0.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.23 to 3.10, P = .97) for cognitive score, 2.36 (95% CI -1.14 to 5.87, P = .19) for language score, and 1.10 (95% CI -2.01 to 4.20, P = .49) for motor score. The association between treatment and the Bayley-III language score was modified by GA at birth (interaction P = .07). Neonates born <27 weeks' gestation exposed to DHA performed better on the Bayley-III language score, compared with the placebo group (mean difference 5.06, 95% CI 0.08-10.03, P = .05). There was no interaction between treatment group and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal DHA supplementation did not improve neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' CA in breastfed, preterm neonates, but subgroup analyses suggested a potential benefit for language in preterm neonates born before 27 weeks' GA.

Effect of Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Very Preterm Infant Growth: Secondary Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of a maternal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation during lactation, compared with a placebo, on the neonatal growth profile of breastfed very preterm infants. METHODS: Preterm infants' growth profile, growth velocity from birth to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA), and growth at 36 weeks' PMA were pre-specified secondary outcomes of a randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted in 16 Canadian neonatal intensive care units (2015-2018). Lactating mothers who delivered before 29 weeks' gestation were given 1.2 g of DHA daily or a placebo within 72 h of delivery and up to 36 weeks' PMA. Analyses were performed using a linear regression model with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: 461 mothers and their 528 infants (DHA, N = 273; placebo, N = 255) were included with mean gestational age of 26.5 weeks (standard deviation [SD] = 1.6); 275 (52.1%) were males; mean birth weight was 895 g (SD = 240). DHA interaction with sex was significant on weight profile (interaction p < 0.001), weight velocity (interaction p = 0.05), and weight at 36 weeks' PMA (interaction p = 0.02). Females in the DHA group gained more weight compared to the placebo group (mean difference [MD], 52.6 g [95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.5-80.8], p < 0.001). Weight velocity was significantly higher in females of the DHA group (MD, 3.4 g/kg/day [95% CI: 0.6-6.2], p = 0.02). At 36 weeks' PMA, the weight of males in the DHA group was significantly smaller (MD, -88.9 g [95% CI: -166.2 to -11.6], p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: DHA positively affected female infants' neonatal weight profile and velocity and negatively affected male infants' weight at 36 weeks' PMA.

Use of SMOF lipid emulsion in very preterm infants does not affect the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia-free survival.

BACKGROUND: We aim to assess whether the docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-containing lipid emulsion (LE) SMOFlipid 20% (Fresenius Kabi Canada Ltd) is associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)-free survival at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age in very preterm infants. METHODS: This cohort study is nested in the MOBYDIck randomized clinical trial (NCT02371460), which investigated the effect of maternal DHA supplementation on BPD-free survival in breastfed very preterm infants born between 23 0/7 and 28 6/7 weeks' gestation in 16 Canadian neonatal intensive care units (2015-2018). Parenteral SMOF-LE was given to the infants according to the sites' routine care protocols. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated using a modified Poisson regression model with generalized estimating equations taking into account recruitment site, multiple birth, DHA supplementation, birth weight, sex, and gestational age. RESULTS: Among 528 infants (mean gestational age, 26.5 weeks [SD, 1.6]), 272 received SMOF-LE. Overall, 56.7% of the infants in the SMOF-LE group and 59.7% infants in the non-SMOF-LE group survived without BPD (adjusted RR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.77-1.14]; P = 0.51). BPD rates were 39.3% in the SMOF-LE group vs 34.1% in the non-SMOF-LE group (adjusted RR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.82-1.47]; P = 0.53). Severe BPD rates were 31.8% in the SMOF-LE group vs 28.8% in the non-SMOF-LE group (adjusted P = 0.59). Mortality was not significantly different between the SMOF-LE (6.7%) and non-SMOF-LE groups (9.5%; adjusted P = 0.40). CONCLUSION: In very preterm infants, intravenous DHA-containing SMOF-LE during the neonatal period was not associated with BPD-free survival.

Poractant alfa versus bovine lipid extract surfactant: prospective comparative effectiveness study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare short term respiratory outcomes in preterm infants treated with bovine lipid extract surfactant or poractant alfa. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective comparative effectiveness cohort study of infants <32 weeks' gestational age requiring surfactant in thirteen centers. Each center provided bovine lipid extract surfactant for a set period of time in the year 2019 and then changed to poractant alfa for the remainder of the year. The primary outcome was total duration of respiratory support. RESULT: 968 infants were included. 494 received bovine lipid extract surfactant and 474 received poractant alfa. No difference was observed in the total duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or non-invasive) (median 38 vs 40.5 days), need to re-dose surfactant, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, survival to discharge, or length of admission. CONCLUSION: In this pragmatic study, we did not identify any difference in short term outcomes between the groups based on the type of surfactant received.

Listeriosis in infants: Prospective surveillance studies in Canada and Switzerland.

OBJECTIVES: International data on listeriosis during infancy from large populations are essential to guide evidence-based empiric antibiotic guidelines for sepsis in infancy. We aimed to determine the incidence, clinical manifestations, and outcome of listeriosis in infants <6 months of age in Canada and Switzerland. METHODS: Prospective, active surveillance of listeriosis in infants <6 months of age was conducted through the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (May 2015 to April 2017) and the Swiss Paediatric Surveillance Unit (April 2017 to March 2018). Confirmed and probable cases were included. RESULTS: In Canada, eight sporadic listeriosis cases were reported (incidence, 1.1/100,000 live births/year). In Switzerland, four cases were reported (incidence, 4.5/100,000 live births/year) of which three were part of a confirmed outbreak with an unclear source. In the two countries, eight of the 12 cases (66.6%) presented as early-onset disease (within the first 7 days of life) and none presented after 28 days life. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal listeriosis is rare. Infants presenting with sepsis, especially after 4 weeks of life, may not routinely require empiric antibiotic coverage for listeriosis. Outbreak-related cases still occur. Continued surveillance is important.

Two-Thirds of Preterm Parents Would Participate in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Double Doses of Steroids to a Single Dose and Placebo.

Animal research strongly suggests that a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) is as effective as a double dose to mature preterm lungs; however, a human randomized controlled trial (RCT) is urgently needed. From August to November 2020, we conducted an online survey of Canadian parents of preterm infants. Survey respondents watched a parent-to-parent video introducing an RCT to study whether the standard double dose of ACS is non-inferior to a single dose (and matching placebo). Approximately two-thirds of respondents reported they were either likely or very likely to participate in the RCT, indicating high parental interest in and support for such a trial.

Topical nitroglycerin ointment as salvage therapy for peripheral tissue ischemia in newborns: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Topical nitroglycerin (TNG) ointment has been used for almost 3 decades to treat neonatal peripheral tissue ischemia, but this product is now no longer being produced by its Canadian manufacturer. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of TNG products in newborns in neonatal intensive care units. METHODS: In this systematic review we searched Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science from inception to April 2020 for studies on the use of TNG products (TNG ointment, TNG spray, glyceryl trinitrate [GTN] patch) for the treatment of neonatal tissue ischemia. We did not apply language or study design limitations. Animal studies and duplicate records were excluded. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. The Tool for Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Case Reports and Case Series was used to assess the risk of bias of individual studies. RESULTS: We included 23 articles (20 case reports, 2 case series and 1 retrospective audit) describing the use of TNG ointment, TNG spray or GTN patch in the treatment of 39 tissue ischemia events in 37 newborns. Twenty-three (62.2%), 12 (32.4%), 1 (2.7%) and 1 (2.7%) infants received TNG ointment, GTN patch, both TNG ointment and GTN patch, and TNG spray, respectively. Nineteen (76.0%) and 7 (53.8%) injuries treated with TNG ointment and GTN patch showed complete recovery, respectively. Two (16.7%) infants treated with GTN patch experienced adverse events (i.e., methemoglobinemia) requiring treatment discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: TNG ointment presents a safe therapeutic modality for salvage therapy of neonatal tissue ischemia. Engagement of stakeholders is essential to address its recent commercial inaccessibility in Canada.

Association between newborn screening analyte profiles and infant mortality.

Objective: To assess whether newborn screening analytes could be utilized beyond their traditional application to identify infants at high risk of mortality within the first 6 months of life.Methods: We linked a province-wide newborn screening registry with health administrative databases to identify infant deaths within 6 months in a source population of live-born infants between 2010 and 2014. We used a nested case-control study design, in which all infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age were included as cases, and a random sample of infants from the source population were selected as controls and were matched to cases at a ratio of 10:1. We examined the association between mortality and screening analytes (acylcarnitines, amino acids, fetal-to-adult hemoglobin ratio, endocrine markers, and enzymes) using lasso regression to fit multivariable models.Results: Among 350 infant deaths between 7 days and 6 months of age, and 3498 matched controls with complete data, our multivariable model demonstrated only modest ability to identify infant deaths (optimism-corrected c-statistic: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.71).Conclusion: We did not find newborn screening analytes to be strongly predictive of infant mortality between 7 days and 6 months of age in the general population of newborns. Future studies should investigate whether predictive modeling within more homogeneous cause-of-death categories could lead to improved predictive ability for infant mortality.

A call for a streamlined ethics review process for multijurisdictional, child health research studies.

To be time and resource efficient in neonatal research and to answer clinically relevant questions with validity and generalizability, large numbers of infants from multiple hospitals need to be included. Multijurisdictional research in Canada is currently fraught with research ethics review process hurdles that lead to delays, administrative costs, and possibly termination of projects. We describe our experience applying for ethics review to 13 sites in 7 provinces for a project comparing two standard of care therapies for preterm born infants with respiratory distress syndrome. We welcome the current opportunity created by the Institute of Human Development Child and Youth Health and the Institute for Genetics, to collaboratively identify practical solutions that would benefit Canadian researchers, Research Ethics Boards, and children and families.

Pediatric drug data in Canadian drug monographs: a descriptive analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimal drug therapy in children relies on the availability of pediatric-specific information. We aimed to describe the current status of pediatric pharmacotherapy data in monographs of new drugs approved by Health Canada. METHODS: In this descriptive analysis, we reviewed the quality and quantity of monographs of new drugs approved by Health Canada between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2016. We excluded drugs withdrawn from the Canadian market and drugs with primary indications irrelevant to pediatrics. We determined the percentage of included drug monographs that listed pediatric-specific information. RESULTS: During this study period, Health Canada approved 281 drugs, 270 of which met our inclusion criteria. Pediatric-specific information and indication were present in 127 (47.1%) and 75 (27.8%) of the drug monographs, respectively. Of all pediatric age groups, neonates had the lowest number of indications listed in the product monographs (7, 2.6%). Only 9 (60%) oral drugs indicated for children 6 years of age or younger were available in child-friendly, age-appropriate dosage forms. INTERPRETATION: Most of the new drugs approved by Health Canada do not contain pediatric or neonatal indications in their product monographs, and therefore, are used "off-label." Regulatory mechanisms are required to promote both neonatal and pediatric drug development and submission of available pediatric data by manufacturers to Health Canada.

Effect of Maternal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia-Free Survival in Breastfed Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Maternal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation may prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia, but evidence remains inconclusive. Objective: To determine whether maternal DHA supplementation during the neonatal period improves bronchopulmonary dysplasia-free survival in breastfed infants born before 29 weeks of gestation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Superiority, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial at 16 Canadian neonatal intensive care units (June 2015-April 2018 with last infant follow-up in July 2018). Lactating women who delivered before 29 weeks of gestation were enrolled within 72 hours of delivery. The trial intended to enroll 800 mothers, but was stopped earlier. Interventions: There were 232 mothers (273 infants) assigned to oral capsules providing 1.2 g/d of DHA from randomization to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and 229 mothers (255 infants) assigned to placebo capsules. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was bronchopulmonary dysplasia-free survival in infants at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. There were 22 secondary outcomes, including mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Results: Enrollment was stopped early due to concern for harm based on interim data from this trial and from another trial that was published during the course of this study. Among 461 mothers and their 528 infants (mean gestational age, 26.6 weeks [SD, 1.6 weeks]; 253 [47.9%] females), 375 mothers (81.3%) and 523 infants (99.1%) completed the trial. Overall, 147 of 268 infants (54.9%) in the DHA group vs 157 of 255 infants (61.6%) in the placebo group survived without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (absolute difference, -5.0% [95% CI, -11.6% to 2.6%]; relative risk, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.04], P = .18). Mortality occurred in 6.0% of infants in the DHA group vs 10.2% of infants in the placebo group (absolute difference, -3.9% [95% CI, -6.8% to 1.4%]; relative risk, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.13], P = .12). Bronchopulmonary dysplasia occurred in 41.7% of surviving infants in the DHA group vs 31.4% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 11.5% [95% CI, 2.3% to 23.2%]; relative risk, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.07 to 1.73], P = .01). Of 22 prespecified secondary outcomes, 19 were not significantly different. Conclusions and Relevance: Among breastfed preterm infants born before 29 weeks of gestation, maternal docosahexaenoic acid supplementation during the neonatal period did not significantly improve bronchopulmonary dysplasia-free survival at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age compared with placebo. Study interpretation is limited by early trial termination. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02371460.