Expertise in colonoscopy intubation does not predict diagnostic accuracy: a simulation-based study.

Background and study aims Studies have linked cecal intubation rate with adenoma detection rate; however, the direct association between technical performance during colonoscopy intubation and withdrawal has never been explored. Thus, it remains unclear whether gentle and efficient intubation predicts superior mucosal inspection. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between performance during intubation and withdrawal in a simulation-based setup. Methods Twenty-four physicians with various experience in colonoscopy performed twice on the Endoscopy Training System (ETS). Intubation skills were evaluated by assessing tasks on the ETS related to intubation (scope manipulation and loop management) and use of a computerized assessment tool called the 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score (3D-CoPS). Diagnostic accuracy was defined by the number of polyps found during the ETS task of mucosal inspection. Pearson's correlations were calculated to explore associations between intubation skill and diagnostic accuracy. Results The correlation analysis between 3D-CoPS and number of polyps found during mucosal inspection revealed a weak and insignificant correlation (0.157, P  = 0.3). Likewise, an insignificant correlation was seen between ETS intubation and number of polyps found (0.149, P  = 0.32). Conclusions We found no evidence to support that technical performance during intubation is correlated with mucosal inspection performance in a simulation-based setting.

Colonoscope retraction technique and predicting adenoma detection rate: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The success of preventing colorectal cancer relies on the expertise of the colonoscopists. Studies suggest that the retraction technique is a powerful indicator of expertise in distinguishing endoscopists with various adenoma detection rates (ADRs). We aimed to develop a retraction technique score and explore the correlation between endoscopists' retraction technique and their ADRs. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter study, 8 colonoscopist nurses and physicians with various ADRs were included. Data from patients admitted for a colonoscopy, as part of the Danish nationwide screening program, were gathered directly from the Olympus ScopeGuide system (UPD-3; Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) providing XYZ-coordinates from the coils along the length of the colonoscope. Motor skill measures were developed based on tip retraction, retraction efficiency, and retraction distance. The principal component analysis was used to study the association among the 3 measures and the historical ADR to create a combined score, the colonoscopy retraction score (CoRS). RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-three recordings were analyzed. We demonstrated a significant and strong correlation between CoRS and ADR (.90, P < .01). Conversely, withdrawal time did not correlate significantly with ADR (.33, P = .42). In procedures without polypectomies or biopsy sampling, a significant and strong correlation was found between CoRS and ADR (.88, P < .01) and between withdrawal time and ADR (.75, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a novel, real-time computerized and unbiased assessment tool for colonoscopy withdrawal. CoRS strongly correlated with ADR with and without therapeutic interventions during withdrawal and could be used to ensure quality instead of minimal withdrawal time. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03587935.).

Validation of an assessment tool for estimation of abdominal aortic aneurysm compression in diagnostic ultrasound.

The study investigated ultrasound (US) transducer push, tantamount to applied transducer pressure, during abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) US scanning in a simulated non-clinical setup. During an assessment of maximal AAA diameter on a three-dimensional print-based AAA phantom, US transducer push varied as much as 2000% (range: 0.52-12.45 kPa) amongst 16 experienced sonographers. The mean transducer push was 5.54 ± 3.91 kPa (CV = 0.71). Deformation of a standardized gel-pad allowed for transducer push calculation based on US images; Young's modulus of the gel-pad was estimated to 44,26 N/m2. The method is theoretically validated in a safe and non-clinical environment. Future investigations with the aim of clinical validation of the gel-pad principle on AAA patients are suggested, including the objectification of the magnitude of an eventual transducer push-related error during US AAA diameter measurement.

Using computerized assessment in simulated colonoscopy: a validation study.

Background and study aims Patient safety during a colonoscopy highly depends on endoscopist competence. Endoscopic societies have been calling for an objective and regular assessment of the endoscopists, but existing assessment tools are time-consuming and prone to bias. We aimed to develop and gather evidence of validity for a computerized assessment tool delivering automatic and unbiased assessment of colonoscopy based on 3 dimensional coordinates from the colonoscope. Methods Twenty-four participants were recruited and divided into two groups based on experience: 12 experienced and 12 novices. Participants performed twice on a physical phantom model with a standardized alpha loop in the sigmoid colon. Data was gathered directly from the Olympus ScopeGuide system providing XYZ-coordinates along the length of the colonoscope. Five different motor skill measures were developed based on the data, named: Travel Length, Tip Progression, Chase Efficiency, Shaft movement without tip progression, and Looping. Results The experinced had a lower travel length ( P  < 0.001), tip progression ( P  < 0.001), chase efficiency ( P  = 0.001) and looping ( P  = 0.006), and a higher shaft movement without tip progression ( P  < 0.001) reaching the cecum compared with the novices. A composite score was developed based on the five measurements to create a combined score of progression, the 3D-Colonoscopy-Progression-Score (3D-CoPS). The 3D-CoPS revealed a significant difference between groups (experienced: 0.495 (SD 0.303) and novices -0.454 (SD 0.707), P  < 0.001). Conclusion This study presents a novel, real-time computerized assessment tool for colonoscopy, and strong evidence of validity was gathered in a simulation-based setting. The system shows promising opportunities for automatic, unbiased and continuous assessment of colonoscopy performance.