RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Renal auto-transplantation is a suitable option for managing patients with major ureteric injury. Conventional Renal auto-transplantation is however, underutilized because of its invasiveness. Completely intra-corporeal robotic renal auto-transplantation is a suitable option to decrease the morbidity. In this case, we report the first use of total intra-corporeal robotic renal auto-transplantation outside of North America. CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old woman presented with an extensive upper left ureter defect, following a high kinetic energy trauma. She underwent 2 median laparotomies, with extensive resection of small intestine, and 1 transverse laparotomy to repair a massive rupture of abdominal muscles. The procedure was performed via a transperitoneal approach, with the assistance of the da Vinci Si robot (Intuitive Surgical Inc. Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The renal auto-transplantation was conducted entirely robotically, in 2 separate stages, using a 4 robotic arm approach. Total operative time was 300â¯min: 150â¯min to harvest the kidney including adhesiolysis, 20â¯min to reposition the patient, and 130â¯min for the robot assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT). The total ischemia time was 96â¯min (3â¯min of warm ischemia, no cold ischemia, 93â¯min of rewarming time). The estimated blood loss was 150â¯mL. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case successfully performed as a total robotic approach outside of North America.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the oncological outcomes of testicle-sparing surgery (TSS) and radical orchiectomy (RO) in patients with Leydig cell tumor (LCT) of the testis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective clinical study was conducted in 12 centers in France. All the patients with histologically proven LCT were included and analyzed according to treatment (organ-sparing surgery or radical orchiectomy). Patients underwent preoperative clinical, biological and imaging assessment. Demographic, clinical, and pathological variables were collected at baseline and compared between groups according to surgical treatment. Follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier estimation and was updated at the end of 2015. RESULTS: Between 1986 and 2014, 56 patients presented with LCT were identified and included in the study. Twenty-one patients (37.5%) underwent TSS and 35 (62.5%) RO. Demographics and tumor characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. Median follow-up was 62 months after TSS, but only 35 months after RO. Two patients (9.5%) developed local recurrence 15 and 34 months after TSS and underwent secondary RO. No local recurrence or metastasis was observed after complementary treatment. No recurrence was observed after RO. Disease-free survival did not differ between the groups (95.2% in TSS versus 77.1% in the RO group, p = 0.23). No patient died in the TSS group, but three patients (8.6%) in the RO group died from other diseases without evidence of relapse. One patient (4.8%) in the TSS group versus five (14.3%) in the RO group were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up suggests that testicle-sparing surgery does not compromise relapse-free survival in the treatment of Leydig cell tumor of the testis.
