A comparison of the WHO 2004 and WHO 2017 thyroid tumor classifications.

INTRODUCTION: The category of borderline malignancy or unknown malignant potential was added to the WHO's 2017 classification of thyroid tumours. A new histological variety of papillary tumours and Hurthle cell tumours was given as a separate entity. The classification has also adopted the Turin criteria for histological diagnosis of poorly differentiated cancer (PDC). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHODS AND MATERIAL: From July 2018 to June 2022, 200 thyroid neoplasm patients at a tertiary care facility in western Maharashtra were participated in the prospective research over a period of 4 years. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The descriptive statistics were used to analyse the collected data. AIM: This study was undertaken to compare the old (2004) and new (2016) WHO classifications and their importance in the treatment of thyroid malignancies. RESULTS: Out of 200 cases, the age range of 31 to 40 years had the greatest number of cases. The ratio of females to males was 5:1. In our study, according to the WHO 2004 classification, malignant tumours comprised 57.5% of the cases, while benign tumours 42.5% of the cases. When tumours were subcategorized, the most frequent benign tumour was follicular adenoma (43.5%) and malignant tumour was papillary thyroid carcinoma (37%). Malignant tumours made up 47.5% of the cases when the tumours were reclassified using the revised WHO 2017 classification, followed by borderline tumours with 27.5% of the cases and benign tumours with 25% of the cases. The most frequent borderline tumour was NIFTP (Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features) (17.5%), the most prevalent malignant tumour was papillary carcinoma (including its variant) (32%), and the most frequent benign tumour was follicular adenoma (27%). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the inclusion of the Boderline Category in the new WHO classification significantly improved thyroid cancer management. WHO 2017 classification prevents under diagnosis (in the case of benign tumors) and over diagnosis (in the case of malignant tumors).

Coexistence of Ectopic Tubal Pregnancy with Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma: A Rare Case Report with Review of Literature.

Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma is a precursor lesion for high-grade pelvic serous carcinoma. The incidence is 0.6%-6% in tubectomy specimens of women who are BRCA-1,2 positive or have a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer. STIC in women who do not have BRCA-1,2 mutations or concomitant high-grade serous carcinoma is exceedingly rare. Ectopic tubal gestation coexisting with serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma is very rarely reported. These lesions pose considerable difficulty in the diagnosis. A combination of histology and immunohistochemical expression p53 and ki67 substantially improves the reproducibility of the diagnosis. Diagnosing these lesions will help identify potential at risk patients and their families for carcinoma. Adequate prolonged follow-up for incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma is the mainstay. We report one such case of a 31-year-old female who was operated for the right tubal gestation and found to have serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma.