Factors Associated With Pelvic Infection After Pre-Peritoneal Pelvic Packing for Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures.

Background: Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) and external fixation has led to improved mortality after devastating pelvic trauma. However, there is limited literature on infection after this intervention. We aim to study the risk factors associated with pelvic infection after PPP. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent PPP at a single level 1 trauma center was performed. Results: Over the 18-year study period, 222 patients were identified. Twenty-three percent of patients had an open fracture. Pelvic angiography was performed in 24% of patients with 16% requiring angioembolization (AE). The average time to packing removal was two (one to two days) days, although 10% of patients had their pelvis re-packed. Overall infection rate was 14% (n = 31); if pelvic re-packing was performed, the infection rate increased to 45%. Twenty-two of the patients with an infection required additional procedures for their infection, and ultimately hardware removal occurred in eight patients. On univariable analysis, patients with pelvic infections had more open fractures (55% vs. 17%; p < 0.01), underwent AE more frequently (29% vs. 14%; p = 0.04), were more likely to undergo repacking (32% vs. 6%; p < 0.01), and had packing in place for longer (2 [1,2] vs. 2 [2,3]; p = 0.01). On logistic multivariable regression analysis, open fracture (odds ratio [OR], 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-14.1) and pelvic re-packing (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.2-18.5) were independent risk factors for pelvic infection. Conclusions: Pelvic infection after PPP is a serious complication independently associated with open fracture and re-packing of the pelvis. Re-intervention was required in most patients with infection.

Early Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures is Feasible in Patients With Non-Urgent Operative Pelvic Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: The feasibility of prioritizing surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in patients with other injuries is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the timing and outcomes of SSRF between patients with and without non-urgent operative pelvic injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, all patients between 2010 and 2020 who underwent SSRF (SSRF group) and those who underwent SSRF and non-urgent operative management of pelvic fractures (SSRF + P group) were included. Demographics, injury characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Over 11 years, 154 SSRF patients were identified, with 143 patients in the SSRF group (93%) and 11 patients in the SSRF + P group (7%). Median number of rib fractures (7 vs 9, P = .04), total number of fractures (11 vs 15, P < .01), and flail segment (54% vs 91%, P = .02) were higher in SSRF + P group. Median time to SSRF was similar (0 vs 1 day, P = .20) between the 2 groups. Median time to pelvic fixation was 3 days in SSRF + P group and 8 out of 11 patients (73%) underwent SSRF prior to pelvic fixation. Median operative time (137 vs 178 mins, P = .14) and median number of ribs plated (4 vs 5, P = .05) were higher in SSRF + P group. There was no difference in SSRF-related complications, pelvic fracture-related complications from operative positioning, rates of pneumonia, or mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: SSRF can be performed early in patients with non-urgent operative pelvic injuries without a difference in pelvic fracture-related complications, SSRF-related complications, pneumonia, or mortality.

Predictors for Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database Study.

Many patients with severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) undergo withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WLSTs) or transition to comfort measures, but noninjury factors that influence this decision have not been well characterized. We hypothesized that WLST would be associated with institutional and geographic noninjury factors. All patients with a head Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥3 were identified from 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program data. We analyzed factors that might be associated with WLST, including procedure type, age, sex, race, insurance, Glasgow Coma Scale score, mechanism of injury, geographic region, and institutional size and teaching status. Adjusted logistic regression was performed to examine factors associated with WLST. Sixty-nine thousand fifty-three patients were identified: 66% male, 77% with isolated TBI, and 7.8% had WLST. The median age was 56 years (34-73). A positive correlation was found between increasing age and WLST. Women were less likely to undergo WLST than men (odds ratio 0.91 [0.84-0.98]) and took more time to for WLST (3 vs 2 days, P < .001). African Americans underwent WLST at a significantly lower rate (odds ratio 0.66 [0.58-0.75]). Variations were also discovered based on US region, hospital characteristics, and neurosurgical procedures. WLST in severe TBI is independently associated with noninjury factors such as sex, age, race, hospital characteristics, and geographic region. The effect of noninjury factors on these decisions is poorly understood; further study of WLST patterns can aid health care providers in decision making for patients with severe TBI.

Variations in Discharge Destination Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury across the United States.

BACKGROUND: Discharge destination after traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be influenced by non-patient factors such as regional or institutional practice patterns. We hypothesized that non-patient factors would be associated with discharge destination in severe TBI patients. METHODS: All patients in the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2016 data set with severe TBI, defined as head Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥3, were categorized by discharge destination. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with each destination; odds ratios and 95% confidence level are reported. Regressions were adjusted for age, gender, race, insurance, GCS, ISS, polytrauma, mechanism, neurosurgical procedure, geographic region, teaching status, trauma center level, hospital size, and neurosurgeon group size. RESULTS: 75,690 patients met inclusion criteria. 51% were discharged to home, 16% to rehab, 14% to SNF, and 11% deceased. Mortality was similar across geographic region, teaching status, and hospital size. Southern patients were more likely to be discharged to home while Northeastern patients were more likely to be discharged to rehab. Treatment by groups of 3 or more neurosurgeons was associated with SNF discharge as was treatment at community or non-teaching hospitals. Patients treated at larger hospitals were less likely to be discharged to rehab and more likely to go to SNF. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic region, neurosurgeon group size, teaching status, and hospital size are significantly associated with variation in discharge destination following severe TBI. Regional and institutional variation in practice patterns may play important roles in recovery for some patients with severe TBI.

Factors Influencing the Entrustment of Resident Operative Autonomy: Comparing Perceptions of General Surgery Residents and Attending Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: General surgery residents may be underprepared for practice, due in part to declining operative autonomy during training. The factors that influence entrustment of autonomy in the operating room are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To identify and compare the factors that residents and faculty consider influential in entrustment of operative autonomy. METHODS: An anonymous survey of 29-item Likert-type scale (1-7, 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree), 9 multiple-choice, and 4 open-ended questions was sent to 70 faculty and 45 residents in a large ACGME-approved general surgery residency program comprised of university, county, and VA hospitals in 2018. RESULTS: Sixty (86%) faculty and 38 (84%) residents responded. Faculty were more likely to identify resident-specific factors such as better resident reputation and higher skill level as important in fostering entrustment. Residents were more likely to identify environmental factors such as a focus on efficiency and a litigious malpractice environment as impeding entrustment. Both groups agreed that work hour restrictions do not decrease autonomy and entrustment does not increase risk to patients. More residents considered low faculty confidence level as a barrier to operative autonomy, while more faculty considered lower resident clinical skill as a barrier. Improvement in resident preparation for cases was cited as an important intervention that could enhance entrustment. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in perspectives exist between general surgery residents and faculty regarding entrustment of autonomy. Residents cite environmental and attending-related factors, while faculty cite resident-specific factors as most influential. Residents and faculty both agree that entrustment is integral to surgical training.

Dose-dependent association between blood transfusion and nosocomial infections in trauma patients: A secondary analysis of patients from the PAMPer trial.

BACKGROUND: The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) trial demonstrated a survival benefit to trauma patients who received thawed plasma as part of early resuscitation. The objective of our study was to examine the association between blood transfusion and nosocomial infections among trauma patients who participated in the PAMPer trial. We hypothesized that transfusion of blood products will be associated with the development of nosocomial infections in a dose-dependent fashion. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data of patients in the PAMPer trial with hospital length of stay of at least 3 days. Demographics, injury characteristics, and number of blood products transfused were obtained to evaluate outcomes. Bivariate analysis was performed to identify differences between patients with and without nosocomial infections. Two logistic regression models were created to evaluate the association between nosocomial infections and (1) any transfusion of blood products, and (2) quantity of blood products. Both models were adjusted for age, sex, and Injury Severity Score. RESULTS: A total of 399 patients were included: age, 46 years (interquartile range, 29-59 years); Injury Severity Score, 22 (interquartile range, 12-29); 73% male; 80% blunt mechanism; and 40 (10%) deaths. Ninety-three (27%) developed nosocomial infections, including pneumonia (n = 67), bloodstream infections (n = 14), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (n = 10), skin and soft tissue infection (n = 8), Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 7), empyema (n = 6), and complicated intra-abdominal infections (n = 3). Nearly 80% (n = 307) of patients received packed red blood cells (PRBCs); 12% received cryoprecipitate, 69% received plasma, and 27% received platelets. Patients who received any PRBCs had more than a twofold increase in nosocomial infections (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.58; p = 0.047). The number of PRBCs given was also associated with the development of nosocomial infection (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.16; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Trauma patients in the PAMPer trial who received a transfusion of at least 1 U of PRBCs incurred a twofold increased risk of nosocomial infection, and the risk of infection was dose dependent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Management of simple and retained hemothorax: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hemothorax poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges both acutely and chronically. A working group of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma convened to formulate a practice management guideline for traumatic hemothorax. METHODS: We formulated four questions: whether tube thoracostomy vs observation be performed, should pigtail catheter versus thoracostomy tube be placed to drain hemothorax, should thrombolytic therapy be attempted versus immediate thoracoscopic assisted drainage (VATS) in retained hemothorax (rHTX), and should early VATS (≤4 days) versus late VATS (>4 days) be performed? A systematic review was undertaken from articles identified in multiple databases. RESULTS: A total of 6391 articles were identified, 14 were selected for guideline construction. Most articles were retrospective with very low-quality evidence. We performed meta-analysis for some of the outcomes for three of the questions. CONCLUSIONS: For traumatic hemothorax we conditionally recommend pigtail catheters, in hemodynamically stable patients. In patients with rHTX, we conditionally recommend VATS rather than attempting thrombolytic therapy and recommend that it should be performed early (≤4 days).

Risk Factors for Wound Infection in Outpatients With Lower Extremity Burns.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate risk factors for wound infection in patients with lower extremity (LE) burn. METHODS: Adults presenting with LE burn from January 2014 to July 2015 were included. Data regarding demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes were obtained. The primary outcome was wound infection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for wound infection. RESULTS: 317 patients were included with a mean age of 43 years and median total body surface area of .8%; 22 (7%) patients had a component of full-thickness (FT) burn; and 212 (67%) patients had below-the-knee (BTK) burn. The incidence of wound infection was 15%. The median time to infection was 5 days, and majority (61%) of the patients developed wound infection by day 5. Patients who developed wound infection were more likely to have an FT burn (22% vs. 5%, P < .001) and BTK burn (87% vs. 64%, P = .002), without a difference in other variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed age (Odds ratio (OR) 1.02 and CI 1.00-1.04), presence of FT burn (OR 5.33 and CI 2.09-13.62), and BTK burn (OR 3.42 and CI 1.37-8.52) as independent risk factors for wound infection (area under the curve = .72). CONCLUSION: Age, presence of FT burn, and BTK burn are independent risk factors for wound infection in outpatients with LE burns.

Critical Care Documentation for the Dying Trauma Patient: Are We Recognizing Our Own Efforts?

BACKGROUND: Missed documentation for critical care time (CCT) for dying patients may represent a missed opportunity for physicians to account for intensive care unit (ICU) services, including end-of-life care. We hypothesized that CCT would be poorly documented for dying trauma patients. METHODS: Adult trauma ICU patients who died between December 2014 and December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Critical care time was not calculated for patients with comfort care code status. Critical care time on the day prior to death and day of death was collected. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with documented CCT. RESULTS: Of 147 patients, 43% had no CCT on day prior to death and 55% had no CCT on day of death. 82% had a family meeting within 1 day of death. Family meetings were independently associated with documented CCT (OR 3.69, P = .008); palliative care consultation was associated with decreased documented CCT (OR .24, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Critical care time is not documented in half of eligible trauma patients who are near death. Conscious (time spent in family meetings and injury acuity) and unconscious factors (anticipated poor outcomes) likely affect documentation.

Burn Wound Colonization, Infection, and Sepsis.

Background: Infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among burn patients, and it is important to understand the progression of wound colonization to wound infection to systemic sepsis. Methods: After a review of the literature we describe the clinical characteristics of burn wound colonization, infection, and sepsis, and conclude with best practices to decrease these complications. Results: Burn wounds are initially sterile after the thermal insult but become colonized by gram-positive organisms and subsequently by gram-negative organisms. Some populations are especially susceptible to initial or subsequent colonization by drug-resistant organisms. An increase in fungal colonization has been observed because of the widespread use of topical antibiotic agents. Male gender, older age, lower extremity burn, scald burn, full-thickness burn, delay in treatment, and pre-existing diabetes place patients at increased risk of infection. These infections range from cellulitis that requires systemic antibiotic agents, to invasive burn wound infection that requires prompt treatment with antibiotic agents and excision. Fungal wound infections pose a special challenge and cause substantial morbidity. Infection that leads to systemic sepsis is difficult to define in burn patients because of the body's compensatory hypermetabolic response to the burn injury. Potential sources of sepsis include wound infections and common nosocomial infections. The American Burn Association Sepsis criteria, defined in 2007, has demonstrated poor specificity for identifying sepsis and septic shock. The best approach to decrease wound infections is prevention. Practices that have been beneficial include isolation rooms, handwashing, appropriate wound care, early excision and grafting, antibiotic stewardship, and nutritional support. Conclusions: A burn patient remains at a substantial risk of wound infection despite advances in care. A burn care provider must understand the natural progression of colonization to infection to sepsis, and the multidisciplinary approach to wound care to limit the morbidity and mortality from these infectious.

Pre-Operative Antibiotic Agents for Facial Fractures: Is More than One Day Necessary?

Background: Despite a paucity of evidence, patients with facial fractures often receive long courses of pre-operative antibiotic agents. This study compared the effect of a short versus long pre-operative antibiotic course on the development of post-operative head/neck infections in this population. Patients and Methods: All adult patients admitted between January 2010 and May 2015 to a level 1 trauma center with isolated head/neck injuries who underwent surgery for facial fracture(s) were included. Patients with infections prior to surgery were excluded. Our primary analysis compared head/neck infections between patients given a short (≤24 hours) versus long (>24 hours) course of pre-operative antibiotic agents. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) were performed to identify risk factors for head/neck infections. Results: This study included 188 patients; median age was 38.5 years, 83% were male, 81% had blunt injuries, 51.6% had fractures in multiple facial thirds, and 48.9% required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. One hundred twenty-five (66.5%) patients received a short course and 63 (33.5%) received a long course of pre-operative antibiotic agents. Head/neck infections were higher in the long course group (28.6% vs 15.2%; p = 0.034), but median days to infection were similar. Factors associated with head/neck infections included penetrating injury, mandible fracture, involvement of multiple facial thirds, ICU admission, operative time, and receiving a long pre-operative antibiotic course. Multivariable logistic regression found mandible fracture (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; p = 0.01) and ICU admission (OR, 3.3; p = 0.003) to be independent predictors of head/neck infections (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.706), but pre-operative antibiotic course was not. Patients with isolated mandible fractures (n = 42) had higher rates of head/neck infections in the long course group (29.4% vs 4.0%; p = 0.032), despite similar demographics. Conclusion: Long (>24 hours) course of continuous pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery for facial fractures did not reduce the development of head/neck infections.

Review of Sepsis in Burn Patients in 2020.

Background: Severe burn injury results in substantial damage to the skin, inhibiting its ability to perform as the primary barrier to infection. Additionally, severe burn injury can lead to critical illness and extensive time in the intensive care unit (ICU). These two factors work to increase the risk of sepsis in the burn patient compared with other hospitalized patients. The increased risk of sepsis is compounded by the difficulty of diagnosing sepsis in severely burned patients because the pathophysiology of large burns mimics sepsis, leading to possible delay in diagnosis and initiation of treatment. Methods: A literature review was performed to discuss and review the diagnostic difficulties and criteria used to identify patients with sepsis. Additionally, the most current management of sepsis was reviewed and described in caring for burn patients with sepsis. Results: The incidence of sepsis in patients with more than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns is between 3% and 30% and is the most common cause of death in the burn patient, with pneumonia being the most common etiology. Several different diagnostic criteria for diagnosing sepsis in burn patients exist, however, none of these criteria have proven to be superior to clinical diagnosis by an experienced burn surgeon. As with sepsis in other patient populations, prompt diagnosis, initiation of antibiotic agents, and source control remain the standard management of sepsis in the burn patient. Conclusions: Because of the loss of the primary infection barrier function of the skin after a substantial burn injury, this patient population is at increased risk for sepsis. Because of the pathophysiology of burn injuries, diagnosing sepsis in the burn population remains challenging. Understanding the most common etiologies of sepsis in burn patients may help with more expedient diagnosis and initiation of treatment.

Grade of injury, not initial management, is associated with unplanned interventions in liver injury.

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for complications after liver injury do not distinguish between patients undergoing selective non-operative management (sNOM) vs operative management (OM) as the initial treatment strategy. Our objective was to identify risk factors for complications requiring an unplanned intervention following sNOM or OM. We hypothesized that patient undergoing sNOM will have fewer unplanned interventions. METHODS: Adults presenting to a level I trauma center with grade III or higher liver injury over a period of 6 years were reviewed. Patient and injury factors, initial management strategy, subsequent complications and interventions were obtained. Bivariate analysis was performed between patients undergoing sNOM vs OM to determine factors associated with unplanned interventions, defined as intervention >48 h after injury. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for unplanned interventions. RESULTS: 191 patients were identified: 105 (55%) grade III, 64 (34%) grade IV, and 22 (12%) grade V injury; 136 (71%) underwent sNOM and 55 (29%) underwent OM. 21 (15%) patients required an unplanned intervention: 26 percutaneous drainage, 10 ERCP, and 3 angiography; 12 had multiple procedures. Male gender, younger age, higher ISS, higher grade of injury, firearm mechanism, and initial OM (all p < 0.05) were associated with unplanned interventions. Firearm mechanism and injury grade IV and V, but not initial OM, were independent risk factors for an unplanned intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Grade of liver injury, not the initial mode of treatment, was significantly associated with requiring an unplanned intervention for liver-related complications. Surveillance at 7-10 days, or prior to discharge, in the high-risk group may be able to capture those requiring unplanned intervention and readmission.

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections among Trauma Patients: Poor Quality of Care or Marker of Effective Rescue?

Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is associated generally with worse outcomes among hospitalized patients, but the impact of CAUTI on clinical outcomes is poorly described in trauma patients. We hypothesized that trauma patients with CAUTI would have worse outcomes such as longer length of stay (LOS), fewer discharges to home, and higher outcome of death. Methods: Patients with LOS >2 d in the 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database were included. Patients with and without CAUTI were matched 1:1 via a propensity score using patient, injury, and hospital factors as covariates. Matched pair analysis was performed to compare difference in clinical outcomes between patients with and without CAUTI. Results: There were 238,274 patients identified, of whom 0.7% had a diagnosis of CAUTI. Prior to matching, CAUTI patients had a higher mortality rate (6.6% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01), but groups differed significantly. There were 1,492 matched pairs created, with effective reduction in bias; post-match propensity score covariates all had absolute standardized differences <0.1. In matched pair analysis, CAUTI patients had lower outcome of death compared with patients without CAUTI (6.7% vs. 10.1%, p < 0.01). The CAUTI was associated with longer length of stay, more intensive care unit and ventilator days, more unplanned events, and fewer discharges to home (all p < 0.01). Conclusions: Trauma patients with CAUTI had lower outcome of death compared with patients without CAUTI, despite worse clinical outcomes in all other aspects. This difference may be associated with "rescue" care in the form of unplanned events, and CAUTI may be an unintended consequence of this "rescue" care, rather than a marker of poor quality of care.

Goals of Care Discussions for the Imminently Dying Trauma Patient.

BACKGROUND: A structured family meeting (FM) is recommended within 72 h of admission for trauma patients with high risk of mortality or disability. Multidisciplinary FMs (MDFMs) may further facilitate decision-making. We hypothesized that FM within three hospital days (HDs) or MDFM would be associated with increased use of comfort measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all adult trauma deaths at an academic level 1 trauma center from December 2014 to December 2017. Death in the first 24 h or on nonsurgical services were excluded. Demographics, injury characteristics, FM characteristics, and outcomes such as length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Early FM was defined as occurring within three HDs; MDFM required attendance by two or more specialty teams. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients were included. Median LOS was 6 d (interquartile range 4-12). FMs were documented in 166 patients (94%), with 57% occurring early. MDFM occurred in 49 (28%), but usually occurred later (median HD 5 and interquartile range 2-8). Early FM was associated with reduced LOS (5 versus 11 d, P < 0.001), ventilator days (4 versus 9 d, P < 0.001), and deaths during a code (1.2% versus 13.2%, P < 0.001). MDFM was associated with higher use of comfort measures (88% versus 68%, P < 0.05). Of patients who transitioned to comfort care status (n = 130, 73.4%), code status change occurred earlier if an early FM occurred (5 versus 13 d, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MDFM is associated with increased comfort care measures, whereas early FM is associated with reduced LOS, ventilator days, death during a code, and earlier comfort care transition.

Outcomes in patients with gunshot wounds to the brain.

INTRODUCTION: Gunshot wounds to the brain (GSWB) confer high lethality and uncertain recovery. It is unclear which patients benefit from aggressive resuscitation, and furthermore whether patients with GSWB undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have potential for survival or organ donation. Therefore, we sought to determine the rates of survival and organ donation, as well as identify factors associated with both outcomes in patients with GSWB undergoing CPR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study at 25 US trauma centers including dates between June 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017. Patients were included if they suffered isolated GSWB and required CPR at a referring hospital, in the field, or in the trauma resuscitation room. Patients were excluded for significant torso or extremity injuries, or if pregnant. Binomial regression models were used to determine predictors of survival/organ donation. RESULTS: 825 patients met study criteria; the majority were male (87.6%) with a mean age of 36.5 years. Most (67%) underwent CPR in the field and 2.1% (n=17) survived to discharge. Of the non-survivors, 17.5% (n=141) were considered eligible donors, with a donation rate of 58.9% (n=83) in this group. Regression models found several predictors of survival. Hormone replacement was predictive of both survival and organ donation. CONCLUSION: We found that GSWB requiring CPR during trauma resuscitation was associated with a 2.1% survival rate and overall organ donation rate of 10.3%. Several factors appear to be favorably associated with survival, although predictions are uncertain due to the low number of survivors in this patient population. Hormone replacement was predictive of both survival and organ donation. These results are a starting point for determining appropriate treatment algorithms for this devastating clinical condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Current Evaluation of Antibiotic Usage in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection after the STOP IT Trial: Did We STOP IT?

BACKGROUND: After publication of the Study to Optimize Peritoneal Infection Therapy (STOP IT) trial, we sought to determine if we were implementing study findings into practice appropriately. We had three objectives: evaluate antibiotic usage; evaluate patient outcomes; and delineate differences in antibiotic usage between general surgeons (GS) and trauma/acute care surgery trained surgeons (TACS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an analysis of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection admitted via the emergency department from February 2014 through May 2017. Complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) was defined as perforated viscus, complicated appendicitis, or ischemic bowel. Patients were excluded if they had an ICD-9/10 code for diverticular/anorectal disease, did not undergo source control, or if the post-operative antibiotic course was not given or was incomplete because of withdrawal of care, change in code status, or death. Outcomes and antibiotic usage were compared before and after the STOP IT publication date. Short-course antibiotic regimens were defined as four days or less of antibiotics after source control. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients met inclusion criteria, with 47 admitted before STOP IT and 86 admitted after. Demographics and other characteristics were similar between these groups. Total antibiotic days and antibiotic days after source control decreased after STOP IT publication (p = 0.031 and p = 0.047, respectively). There were no differences in hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, surgical site infections, intra-abdominal abscesses, or death between the two groups. Short-course antibiotic compliance increased after publication from 30% to 52% (p = 0.012). Compared with GS, patients managed by TACS had decreased total antibiotic days (p = 0.030) and antibiotic days after source control (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated decreased antibiotic days and increased use of short-course antibiotic regimens for patients with cIAI after the publication of STOP IT. However, there still appears to be opportunity for improved adherence to short-course regimens, as well as opportunities to educate our colleagues.

Efficiency of care and cost for common emergency general surgery conditions: Comparison by surgeon training and practice.

BACKGROUND: Our institutional emergency general surgery service is staffed by both trauma and critical care-trained surgeons and other boarded general surgeons and subspecialists. We compared efficiency of care for common emergency general surgery conditions between trauma and critical care-trained surgeons and boarded general surgeons and subspecialists. METHODS: Adults admitted between February 2014 and May 2017 with acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, intestinal obstruction, incarcerated hernia, or other acute abdominal diagnoses seen by emergency general surgery service were included. Demographic characteristics, consulting surgeon, operations, outcomes, and cost data were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 1,363 patients were included: 384 (28.2%) with acute appendicitis, 477 (35.0%) with acute cholecystitis, 406 (29.8%) with intestinal obstruction, 22 (1.6%) with incarcerated hernia, and 74 (5.4%) with other acute abdominal diagnoses. Trauma and critical care-trained surgeons saw 836 (61.3%) patients. There was no difference in operative management between the two groups, however, trauma and critical care-trained surgeons had significantly less time to the operative room (7.0 vs 12.9 hours; P < .001), without a difference in duration of stay or costs. The subgroups of acute appendicitis and acute cholecystitis when treated by trauma and critical care-trained surgeons had less time to the operative room (8.4 vs 17.4 hours; P < .001), shorter hospital stay (2.5 vs 2.8 days; P = .021), and less emergency department cost ($822 vs $876; P = .012). CONCLUSION: Compared with boarded general surgeons and subspecialists, trauma and critical care-trained surgeons provide more efficient care for common emergency general surgery conditions, with less time from consultation to the operative room.

Utility of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting bacteremia in critically ill burn patients.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether qSOFA ≥2 and an increase in SOFA (ΔSOFA) ≥2 can help predict bacteremia in a critically ill burn population. METHODS: Patients age ≥15 and TBSA ≥15% admitted between 2009 and 2015 were included. All blood cultures were recorded, and positive and negative blood culture days were defined based on the culture results. SOFA and qSOFA scores were compared between positive and negative blood culture days. RESULTS: There were 50 patients in our study with a mean age of 47yrs and mean TBSA burn of 37%. Bacteremic patients had larger TBSA and full thickness burns, higher revised Baux score, and longer hospital LOS, without a difference in mortality, compared to non-bacteremic patients. There was no difference in qSOFA and SOFA scores between positive and negative blood culture days. A ΔSOFA ≥5 was highly specific for positive blood culture days. CONCLUSIONS: SOFA and qSOFA have limited ability to predict bacteremia in critically ill burn patients.

Managing complications in endoscopic procedures: bleeding from a biopsy site.

Bleeding related to endoscopic biopsies is relatively uncommon and tends to be a self-limiting process. This article aims to identify those groups of patients that are at a higher risk at the time of the pre procedural evaluation, and to review the current guidelines regarding high risk patients (with special consideration for those who are anticoagulated). It also reviews current strategies for diagnosis, initial evaluation and management of a post procedural bleed. These include all the tools in an endoscopist's armamentarium (thermal, mechanical and chemical) for local control, as well as a discussion about the more severe bleeds that might require interventional radiology or salvage surgery.