Stellate ganglion instrumentation for pharmacological blockade, nerve recording, and stimulation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias: Preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: Stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) can control ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), but outcomes are unclear. Percutaneous stellate ganglion (SG) recording and stimulation in humans has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of SGB and the feasibility of SG stimulation and recording in humans with VAs. METHODS: Two patient cohorts were included-group 1: patients undergoing SGB for drug-refractory VAs. SGB was performed by injection of liposomal bupivacaine. Incidence of VAs at 24 and 72 hours and clinical outcomes were collected; group 2: patients undergoing SG stimulation and recording during VA ablation; a 2-F octapolar catheter was placed at the SG at the C7 level. Recording (30 kHz sampling, 0.5-2 kHz filter) and stimulation (up to 80 mA output, 50 Hz, 2 ms pulse width for 20-30 seconds) was performed. RESULTS: Group 1 included 25 patients [age 59.2 ± 12.8 years; 19 (76%) men] who underwent SGB for VAs. Nineteen patients (76.0%) were free of VA up to 72 hours postprocedure. However, 15 (60.0%) had VAs recurrence for a mean of 5.47 ± 4.52 days. Group 2 included 11 patients (mean age 63 ± 12.7 years; 82.7% men). SG stimulation caused consistent increases in systolic blood pressure. We recorded unequivocal signals with temporal association with arrhythmias in 4 of 11 patients. CONCLUSION: SGB provides short-term VA control, but has no benefit in the absence of definitive VA therapies. SG recording and stimulation is feasible and may have value to elicit VA and understand neural mechanisms of VA in the electrophysiology laboratory.

Outcomes of conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: A multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Whether conduction system pacing (CSP) is an alternative option for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure remains an area of active investigation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of CSP compared to biventricular pacing (BiVP). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients who fulfilled CRT indications and received CSP. Patients with CSP were matched using propensity score matching and compared in a 1:1 ratio to patients who received BiVP. Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed. Response to CRT was defined as an absolute increase of ≥5% in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months post-CRT. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were included. Mean age was 69.8 ± 12.5 years, and 66 (27.7%) were female. Sixty-nine patients (29%) had His-bundle pacing, 50 (21%) had left bundle branch area pacing, and 119 (50%) had BiVP. Mean follow-up duration in the CSP and BiVP groups was 269 ± 202 days and 304 ± 262 days, respectively (P = .293). The proportion of CRT responders was greater in the CSP group than in the BiVP group (74% vs 60%, respectively; P = .042). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in the time to first heart failure hospitalization (log-rank P = .78) and overall survival (log-rank P = .68) between the CSP and BiVP groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, CSP resulted in greater improvement in LVEF compared to BiVP. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to validate these outcomes and further investigate the different options available for CSP.

Substrate Ablation by Multivein, Multiballoon Coronary Venous Ethanol for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the setting of structural heart disease often requires extensive substrate elimination that is not always achievable by endocardial radiofrequency ablation. Epicardial ablation is not always feasible. Case reports suggest that venous ethanol ablation (VEA) through a multiballoon, multivein approach can lead to effective substrate ablation, but large data sets are lacking. METHODS: VEA was performed in 44 consecutive patients with ablation-refractory VT (ischemic, n=21; sarcoid, n=3; Chagas, n=2; idiopathic, n=18). Targeted veins were selected by mapping coronary veins on the epicardial aspect of endocardial scar (identified by bipolar voltage <1.5 mV), using venography and signal recording with a 2F octapolar catheter or by guidewire unipolar signals. Epicardial mapping was performed in 15 patients. Vein segments in the epicardial aspect of VT substrates were treated with double-balloon VEA by blocking flow with 1 balloon while injecting ethanol through the lumen of the second balloon, forcing (and restricting) ethanol between balloons. Multiple balloon deployments and multiple veins were used as needed. In 22 patients, late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaged the VEA scar and its evolution. RESULTS: Median ethanol delivered was 8.75 (interquartile range, 4.5-13) mL. Injected veins included interventricular vein (6), diagonal (5), septal (12), lateral (16), posterolateral (7), and middle cardiac vein (8), covering the entire range of left ventricular locations. Multiple veins were targeted in 14 patients. Ablated areas were visualized intraprocedurally as increased echogenicity on intracardiac echocardiography and incorporated into 3-dimensional maps. After VEA, vein and epicardial ablation maps showed elimination of abnormal electrograms of the VT substrate. Intracardiac echocardiography demonstrated increased intramural echogenicity at the targeted region of the 3-dimensional maps. At 1 year of follow-up, median of 314 (interquartile range, 198-453) days of follow-up, VT recurrence occurred in 7 patients, for a success of 84.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Multiballoon, multivein intramural ablation by VEA can provide effective substrate ablation in patients with ablation-refractory VT in the setting of structural heart disease over a broad range of left ventricular locations.

Advanced Techniques for Ethanol Ablation of Left Ventricular Summit Region Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Coronary venous ethanol ablation (VEA) can be used as a strategy to treat ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit, but collateral flow and technical challenges cannulating intramural veins in complex venous anatomies can limit its use. Advanced techniques for VEA can capitalize on collateral vessels between target and nontarget sites to improve success. METHODS: Of 55 patients with left ventricular summit ventricular arrhythmia, advanced techniques were used in 15 after initial left ventricular summit intramural vein mapping failed to show suitable targets for single vein, single-balloon VEA. All patients had previous radiofrequency ablation attempts. Techniques included: double-balloon for distal protection to block distal flow and target the proximal portion of a large intramural vein where best signal was proximal (n=6); balloons in 2 different left ventricular summit veins for a cross-fire multivein VEA (n=4); intramural collateral vein-to-vein cannulation to reach of targeted vein via collateral with antegrade ethanol and proximal balloon block (n=2); prolonged ethanol dwell time for vein sclerosis of large intramural vein and subsequent VEA (n=3); and intramural collateral VEA (n=1). RESULTS: Fifteen (8 females) patients (age 60.6±17.6 years) required advanced techniques. Procedure time was 210±49.9 minutes, fluoroscopy time was 25.3±14.1 minutes, and 113±17.9 cc of contrast was utilized. A median of 7 cc of ethanol was delivered (range, 4-15 cc). Intraprocedural radiofrequency ablation was delivered before ethanol in 9 out of 15 patients but failed. Ethanol achieved acute success in all 15 patients. Ethanol was used as the sole treatment in two patients. At a median follow-up of 194 days, one patient experienced recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced techniques capitalizing on venous anatomy can enable successful VEA and selective targeting of arrhythmogenic sites, by blocking distal flow, utilization of collaterals between nontarget and target veins and multivein VEA. Understanding individual anatomy is critical for VEA success.

Role of chronic continuous intravenous lidocaine in the clinical management of patients with malignant type 3 long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Type 3 long QT syndrome (LQT3) is caused by pathogenic, gain-of-function variants in SCN5A leading to a prolonged action potential, ventricular ectopy, and torsades de pointes. Treatment options include pharmacotherapy, cardiac denervation, and/or device therapy. Rarely, patients with malignant LQT3 require cardiac transplantation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of chronic continuous intravenous (IV) lidocaine as a therapeutic option for select patients with LQT3 refractory to standard therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients evaluated and treated at Mayo Clinic and identified 4 of 161 patients with LQT3 (2.5%) who were refractory to standard therapies and therefore treated with IV lidocaine. RESULTS: There were 4 patients (2 female [50%]). The median age at first IV lidocaine infusion was 2 months (interquartile range 1.5-4.8 months), and the median cumulative duration on IV lidocaine was 11.5 months (interquartile range 8.7-17.8 months). The main indication for IV lidocaine in all patients was persistent ventricular arrhythmias. Before IV lidocaine, all patients received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and while on intermittent IV lidocaine, all patients underwent bilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation. Additionally, 2 (50%) patients had cardiac ablation for premature ventricular complexes. In all patients, lidocaine infusion resulted in a significant reduction of LQT3-triggered cardiac events. The main side effects of IV lidocaine observed were dizziness (n = 2, 50%) and seizures (n = 2, 50%). During follow-up, 3 of 4 (75%) patients underwent orthotopic cardiac transplantation. The remaining patient continues to receive IV lidocaine bolus for rescue as needed. CONCLUSION: For patients with LQT3 who are refractory to standard treatment, chronic IV lidocaine infusion can be used as a potential "bridge to transplant."

PET-Driven, Voltage-Guided Atrial Endomyocardial Biopsy Clinches the Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is used in diagnosing infiltrative and other suspected cardiomyopathies. We present a case in which positron emission tomography- and electroanatomic mapping-guided EMB of the atrial septum confirmed the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis in a patient with negative findings on ventricular and lymph node biopsy. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Alcohol Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia.

Catheter-based radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an effective, well-established therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, a large number of patients still have recurrences, particularly those with substrates arising from intramural locations that are inaccessible through endo- or epicardial catheter approaches. Several unconventional ablation techniques have been proposed to treat RF-refractory VT, including transarterial coronary ethanol ablation and retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation. We review the evidence regarding the mechanisms, procedural aspects, and alcohol ablation outcomes for ventricular arrhythmias.

Sleep Apnea and Atrial Fibrillation: Role of the Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System.

Sleep apnea is highly associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), and both diseases are highly prevalent in the United States. The mechanistic underpinnings that contribute to their association remain uncertain, but numerous possible mechanisms have been proposed, including dysfunction of the cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS). Studies have reported that apnea induces hyperactivity of the ANS, leading to increases in AF susceptibility. This review compiles the latest evidence on the role of the ANS in sleep-apnea-induced AF.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion.

Catheter ablation has become a cornerstone treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation is the accepted approach for paroxysmal AF ablation, but it is less effective for persistent AF. The vein of Marshall (VOM) is located in the epicardial left atrium and can be a source of AF triggers as well as a tract for autonomic nerves. It directly communicates with the underlying myocardium, including the left atrial ridge and the posterior mitral isthmus. This review discusses the latest evidence regarding the mechanisms, procedural aspects, and outcomes of VOM ethanol infusion when used as an adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent AF.

Venous anatomy of the left ventricular summit: Therapeutic implications for ethanol infusion.

BACKGROUND: Venous ethanol ablation (VEA) is effective for treatment of left ventricular (LV) summit (LVS) arrhythmias. The LVS venous anatomy is poorly understood and has inconsistent nomenclature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to delineate the LVS venous anatomy by selective venography and 3-dimensional (3D) mapping during VEA and by venous-phase coronary computed tomographic angiography (vCTA). METHODS: We analyzed (1) LVS venograms and 3D maps of 53 patients undergoing VEA; and (2) 3D reconstructions of 52 vCTAs, tracing LVS veins. RESULTS: Angiography identified the following LVS veins: (1) LV annular branch of the great cardiac vein (GCV) (19/53); (2) septal (rightward) branches of the anterior ventricular vein (AIV) (53/53); and (3) diagonal branches of the AIV (51/53). Collateral connections between LVS veins and outflow, conus, and retroaortic veins were common. VEA was delivered to target arrhythmias in 38 of 53 septal, 6 of 53 annular, and 2 of 53 diagonal veins. vCTA identified LVS veins (range 1-5) in a similar distribution. GCV-AIV transition could either form an angle close to the left main artery bifurcation (n = 16; 88° ± 13°) or cut diagonally (n = 36; 133°±12°) (P ≤.001). Twenty-one patients had LV annular vein. In 28 patients only septal LVS veins were visualized in vCTA, in 2 patients only diagonal veins and in 22 patients both septal and diagonal veins were seen. In 39 patients the LVS veins reached the outflow tracts and their vicinity. CONCLUSION: We provide a systematic atlas and nomenclature of LVS veins related to arrhythmogenic substrates. vCTA can be useful for noninvasive evaluation of LVS veins before ethanol ablation.

Determinants of outcome impact of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion when added to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A secondary analysis of the VENUS randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The Vein of Marshall Ethanol for Untreated Persistent AF (VENUS) trial demonstrated that adding vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion to catheter ablation (CA) improves ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There was significant heterogeneity in the impact of VOM ethanol infusion on rhythm control. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between outcomes and (1) achievement of bidirectional perimitral conduction block and (2) procedural volume. METHODS: The VENUS trial randomized patients with persistent AF (N = 343) to CA combined with VOM ethanol or CA alone. The primary outcome (freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia [AT] lasting longer than 30 seconds after a single procedure) was analyzed by 2 categories: (1) successful vs no perimitral block and (2) high- (>20 patients enrolled) vs low-volume centers. RESULTS: In patients with perimitral block, the primary outcome was reached 54.3% after VOM-CA and 37% after CA alone (P = .01). Among patients without perimitral block, freedom from AF/AT was 34.0% after VOM-CA and 37.0% after CA (P = .583). In high-volume centers, the primary outcome was reached in 56.4% after VOM-CA and 40.2% after CA (P = .01). In low-volume centers, freedom from AF/AT was 30.77% after VOM-CA and 32.61% after CA (P = .84). In patients with successful perimitral block from high-volume centers, the primary outcome was reached in 59% after VOM-CA and 39.1% after CA (P = .01). Tests for interaction were significant (P = .002 for perimitral block and P = .04 for center volume). CONCLUSION: Adding VOM ethanol infusion to CA has a greater impact on outcomes when associated with perimitral block and performed in high-volume centers. Perimitral block should be part of the VOM procedure.

Intramural Venous Ethanol Infusion for Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias: Outcomes of a Multicenter Experience.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and outcomes of retrograde venous ethanol ablation in treating ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). BACKGROUND: Retrograde coronary venous ethanol ablation (RCVEA) can be effective for radiofrequency ablation (RFA)-refractory VAs, particularly those arising in the LV summit (LVS). METHODS: Patients with drug and RFA-refractory VAs were considered for RCVEA after RF failure attempts. Intramural coronary veins (tributaries of the great cardiac, anterior interventricular, lateral cardiac, posterolateral, and middle cardiac) were mapped using an angioplasty wire. Ethanol infusion was delivered in veins with appropriate signals. RESULTS: Of 63 patients (age 63 ± 14 years; 60% men) with VAs (71% extrasystole, 29% ventricular tachycardia, 76% LVS origin), RCVEA was performed in 56 patients who had suitable vein branches. These were defined as those amenable to cannulation and with intramural signals that preceded those mapped in the epicardium or endocardium and had better matching pace maps or entrainment responses. Seven patients had no suitable veins and underwent RFA. In 38 of 56 (68%) patients, the VAs were successfully terminated exclusively with ethanol infusion. In 17 of 56 (30%) patients, successful ablation was achieved using ethanol with adjunctive RFA in the vicinity of the infused vein due to acute recurrence or ethanol-induced change in VA morphology. Overall, isolated or adjuvant RCVEA was successful in 55 of 56 (98%) patients. At 1-year follow-up, 77% of patients were free of recurrent arrhythmias. Procedural complications included 2 venous dissections that led to pericardial effusions. CONCLUSIONS: RCVEA offers a significant long-term effective treatment for patients with drug and RF-refractory VAs.