Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Biomed Res Int ; 2014: 180804, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24967334

RESUMEN

Palpation of organs is one of the oldest clinical examination techniques, for instance, if you think of the palpation of the breast or the digital rectal examination of the prostate, where hard palpable regions are suspicious for cancer. This is the basic principle of real-time elastography, an ultrasound technique, which is able to visualise tissue elasticity. Since prostate cancer features an increased stiffness due to the higher cell and vessel density than the normal surrounding tissue, real-time elastography has been used for several years for prostate cancer detection. This review introduces the different techniques of ultrasound elastography and furthermore summarises its limitations and potentials.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 17(1): 70-4, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24165692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between preoperative [-2]proPSA, the Gleason Score (GS) and the risk of non-organ-confined (NOC) disease in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Beckman Coulter Access immunoassay was used to study serum specimens of 381 patients enrolled in a prostate cancer (PCa) early detection program. Inclusion criteria were three or more available serum specimens over 4 years before diagnosis. The values obtained were correlated with the GSs and pathological stages of specimens obtained at RP. RESULTS: [-2]proPSA levels were significantly higher in the cancer group (n=208) than in the benign group (n=173). Already 4 years before diagnosis [-2]proPSA differed significantly between PCa and benign prostate in all measured time points, however, highest prediction value was 2 and 1 years before diagnosis (P<0.001). When stratified [-2]proPSA levels according to GS of RP specimens, [-2]proPSA was highest in patients with ≥GS8 and lowest in those with ≤GS6.The difference in [-2]proPSA values between GS≥8 and GS≤7 was highly significant (P<0.01) already 3 years before diagnosis. Investigating the correlation between extraprostatic extension and the preoperative [-2]proPSA levels we found preoperative [-2]proPSA values significantly higher in men with NOC PCa compared with organ-confined (OC) cancers.The highest predictive value of [-2]proPSA to differ between OC and extraprostatic extension was found 3 and 2 years before RP. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high [-2]proPSA levels in the years before cancer diagnosis are at a higher risk of having aggressive PCas. Thus, the [-2]proPSA should be included in the treatment decision-making for managing screen-detected PCa.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Periodo Preoperatorio , Pronóstico , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía
3.
Radiologe ; 51(11): 938, 940-6, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22083309

RESUMEN

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. The diagnosis is based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. These techniques have considerable limitations, which result in unnecessary biopsies. Furthermore the biopsies are associated with morbidity and costs. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Standard gray-scale ultrasound has a low sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: New ultrasound technologies, including color- and power Doppler ultrasound, contrast enhanced US and real-time sonoelastography have shown to improve prostate cancer diagnosis. PERFORMANCE: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound has shown a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 95%), a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.8% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.8% for prostate cancer detection. Real-time sonoelastography has shown a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 81% and NPV of 91% for prostate cancer diagnosis. ACHIEVEMENTS: Most studies show that these new ultrasound modalities demonstrate a 1.5 to 2.5 times higher detection of prostate cancer per biopsy specimen compared with systematic biopsy. Multicenter studies results are at present lacking but are, however ongoing. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In patients with suspected prostate cancer (elevated PSA, suspicious DRE) these new ultrasound techniques should be used. These techniques can detect prostate cancer and allow a targeted biopsy approach.


Asunto(s)
Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/instrumentación , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Ultrasonografía/tendencias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA