Effects of humic acid on arsenic(V) removal by zero-valent iron from groundwater with special references to corrosion products analyses.

The effects of humic acid (HA) on As(V) removal by zero-valent iron (Fe(0)) from groundwater, associated with corrosion products analyses, were investigated using batch experiments. It was found that arsenic was rapidly removed from groundwater possibly due to its adsorption and co-precipitation with the corrosion products of Fe(0). The removal rate of arsenic by Fe(0) was inhibited in the presence of HA probably because of the formation of soluble Fe-humate in groundwater which hindered the production of iron precipitates. A longer reaction time was then required for arsenic removal. Such an influence of HA on arsenic removal increased with increasing HA concentration from 5 to 25mgL(-1). The binding capacity of HA for dissolved Fe was estimated to be about 0.75mg Femg(-1) HA. When the complexation of HA with dissolved Fe was saturated, further corrosion of Fe(0) would produce precipitates, which significantly accelerated the removal of arsenic from groundwater via adsorption and co-precipitation with the corrosion products. Iron (hydr)oxides such as maghemite, lepidocrocite, and magnetite were characterized by XRD analyses as the corrosion products, while As(V) was found on the surface of these corrosion products as detected by fourier transform infrared spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

Removal of chromium (VI) by acid-washed zero-valent iron under various groundwater geochemistry conditions.

The hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) removal capacity of acid-washed zerovalent iron (AW-Fe0) was evaluated under different groundwater geochemistry conditions through column experiments. It was found that each gram of the AW-Fe0 could remove 0.65-1.76 mg of Cr(VI) from synthetic groundwater in the absence of bicarbonate (HCO3-), magnesium and/or calcium ions. Groundwater geochemistry was found to exert various degrees of impact on Cr(VI) removal by the AW-Fe0, in which HCO3- alone gave the mildest impact whereas the copresence of calcium and HCO3- exerted the greatest impact In comparison with the unwashed Fe0, the AW-Fe0 showed a poorer Cr(VI) removal capacity and was also more susceptible to the influence of the dissolved groundwater constituents on Cr(VI) removal,thereby indicating the unsuitability of using AW-Fe0 in permeable reactive barriers for remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater. On the AW-Fe0 surface, where the indigenous iron precipitates were almost erased, trivalent chromium including chromium (III) oxides, hydroxides, and oxyhydroxides in irregular strip, chick footmark-liked or boulder-liked forms as well as Cr(III)-Cr(VI) mixed oxides were detected.

Hardness and carbonate effects on the reactivity of zero-valent iron for Cr(VI) removal.

Zero-valent iron (Fe0) was used to remove hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), in groundwater via a coupled reduction-oxidation reaction. Nine columns were set up under various groundwater geochemistry to investigate the effects of hardness and carbonate on Cr(VI) removal. The Cr(VI) removal capacity of Fe0 was found to be about 4 mgCr/g Fe0 in the control column (i.e., column 1). A slight decrease in the Cr(VI) removal capacity was found in the presence of calcium hardness. However, there was a 17% drop in the Cr(VI) removal capacity when magnesium hardness was present at low to moderately hard level. Results also revealed that carbonate changed the morphology of the Fe0 by formation of pale green precipitates on the iron filings. Furthermore, there was a 33% decrease in the Cr(VI) removal capacity of Fe0 when both carbonate and hardness ions were present. In general, the presence of hardness ions and carbonate in groundwater have great impact on the Fe0 by formation of passivated precipitates, such as CaCO3, on the Fe0 surface resulting in a diminished lifespan of the Fe0 by blocking electron transfer.