Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 470, 2023 11 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38037130

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is difficult to predict in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection, leading to the overuse of antifungal treatments. Serum and peritoneal 1.3-beta-D-glucan (sBDG and pBDG) have been proposed to confirm or invalidate the diagnosis of IAC, but clinical studies have reported inconsistent results, notably because of heterogeneous populations with a low IAC prevalence. This study aimed to identify a high-risk IAC population and evaluate pBDG and sBDG in diagnosing IAC. METHODS: This prospective multicenter noninterventional French study included consecutive critically ill patients undergoing abdominal surgery for abdominal sepsis. The primary objective was to establish the IAC prevalence. The secondary objective was to explore whether sBDG and pBDG could be used to diagnose IAC. Wako® beta-glucan test (WT, Fujifilm Wako Chemicals Europe, Neuss, Germany) was used for pBDG measurements. WT and Fungitell® beta-D-glucan assay (FA, Associate of Cape Cod, East Falmouth, USA) were used for sBDG measurements. RESULTS: Between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022, 199 patients were included. Patients were predominantly male (63%), with a median age of 66 [54-72] years. The IAC prevalence was 44% (87/199). The main IAC type was secondary peritonitis. Septic shock occurred in 63% of cases. After multivariate analysis, a nosocomial origin was associated with more IAC cases (P = 0.0399). The median pBDG level was significantly elevated in IAC (448 [107.5-1578.0] pg/ml) compared to non-IAC patients (133 [16.0-831.0] pg/ml), P = 0.0021. For a pBDG threshold of 45 pg/ml, the negative predictive value in assessing IAC was 82.3%. The median sBDG level with WT (n = 42) at day 1 was higher in IAC (5 [3.0-9.0] pg/ml) than in non-IAC patients (3 [3.0-3.0] pg/ml), P = 0.012. Similarly, median sBDG level with FA (n = 140) at day 1 was higher in IAC (104 [38.0-211.0] pg/ml) than in non-IAC patients (50 [23.0-141.0] pg/ml), P = 0.009. Combining a peritonitis score < 3, sBDG < 3.3 pg/ml (WT) and pBDG < 45 pg/ml (WT) yielded a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection requiring surgery, the IAC prevalence was 44%. Combining low sBDG and pBDG with a low peritonitis score effectively excluded IAC and could limit unnecessary antifungal agent exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number 03997929, first registered on June 24, 2019).


Asunto(s)
Candidiasis , Infecciones Intraabdominales , Peritonitis , beta-Glucanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Glucanos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Candidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/diagnóstico , Peritonitis/diagnóstico , beta-Glucanos/análisis , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 84(12): 1369-1376, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Decision to start an anti-fungal therapy in intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is complex. Yeast culture, considered the gold standard, suffers from a delayed response time and exposes the patient to delayed introduction of anti-fungal therapy. We sought to evaluate the performance and feasibility of measuring 1,3-ß-D-glucan (1,3-BDG) in the peritoneal fluid (PF) for the diagnosis of IAC. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively all PF obtained during abdominal surgery for critically ill adult patients presenting intra-abdominal infections. For each PF sample, direct examination, bacterial and fungal culture, fungal PCR and 1,3-BDG measurements were performed. The diagnostic performance of each technique and the Peritonitis score were calculated considering the positive yeast culture as the reference. The levels of 1,3-BDG were compared between IAC and non-IAC patients. RESULTS: During an 8-month period in 2016, 33 PF samples were recovered. Median (interquartile range) SAPS 2 and SOFA scores were 44 (9-94) and 9 (4-15), respectively. There were seven cases of IAC, 14 of bacterial peritonitis and 12 of undocumented peritonitis. All IAC cases were secondary peritonitis, with a 1,3-BDG level of 1461 (325-5000) versus 224 (68-1357) pg/mL in the non-IAC group (P=0.03). When the 1,3-BDG level was ≤310 pg/mL, its negative predictive value was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: In secondary peritonitis, a peritoneal measurement of 1,3-BDG ≤310 pg/mL could rule out IAC.


Asunto(s)
Líquido Ascítico/química , Candidiasis/diagnóstico , beta-Glucanos/análisis , Abdomen , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Proteoglicanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Shock ; 49(1): 24-28, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28682938

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite recent management improvement, including Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS), refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest (ROHCA) survival remains dramatically low. METHODS: We assessed an innovative strategy (Out of hoSpital Cardiac ARrest-ExtraCorporeal Life Support-"OSCAR-ECLS") to optimize access to ECLS of ROHCA patients and reduce the delay between recognition and ECLS implantation. METHODS: This study, conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital, compared the survival and delay times of ROHCA patients treated by ECLS before and after OSCAR-ECLS implementation. This procedure included an early recognition of ROHCA 10 min after initiation of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation; the optimization of patient selection and reduction in time from collapse to ECLS initiation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients before and 32 patients after OSCAR-ECLS implementation were identified between 2013 and 2016. Time to ECLS initiation was 99 (90-107) min before OSCAR-ECLS vs. 80 (65-94) min during the OSCAR-ECLS period (P = 0.0007), mostly due to a reduction in time spent on site: 48 (40.0-54.0) min vs. 24 (20.0-28.0) min (P = 0.0001). Survival at hospital discharge was 7% (1/14) before OSCAR-ECLS and 25% (8/32) during the OSCAR-ECLS period (P = 0.20). Only one patient survived with a Glasgow Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score = 1 before the OSCAR-ECLS procedure while during the OSCAR-ECLS procedure, eight patients (25%) survived, six with a CPC score = 1, one with a CPC score = 2, and one with a CPC score = 3. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a new paradigm of ROHCA dramatically shortened the time to ECLS initiation by reducing the time spent on site by more than 20 min. Survival improved from 7% to 25% after implementation of OSCAR-ECLS.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Adulto , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...