Pivotal Dose of Pembrolizumab: A Dose-Finding Strategy for Immuno-Oncology.

Despite numerous publications emphasizing the value of dose finding, drug development in oncology is dominated by the mindset that higher dose provides higher efficacy. Examples of dose finding implemented by biopharmaceutical firms can change this mindset. The purpose of this article is to outline a pragmatic dose selection strategy for immuno-oncology (IO) and other targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The approach was implemented for pembrolizumab. Selecting a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) with a novel mechanism of action is often challenging due to uncertain relationships between pharmacodynamics measurements and clinical end points. Additionally, phase I efficacy and safety data are generally inadequate for RP2D selection for IO mAbs. Here, the RP2D was estimated based on phase I (clinical study KN001 A and A2) pharmacokinetics data as the dose required for target saturation, which represents a surrogate for maximal pharmacological effect for antagonist mAbs. Due to limitations associated with collecting and analyzing tumor biopsies, characterizing intratumoral target engagement (TE) is challenging. To overcome this gap, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model was implemented to predict intratumoral TE. As tumors are spatially heterogeneous, TE was predicted in well-vascularized and poorly vascularized tumor regions. Additionally, impact of differences in target expression, for example, due to interindividual variability and cancer type, was simulated. Simulations showed that 200 mg every 3 weeks can achieve ≥ 90% TE in clinically relevant scenarios, resulting in the recommendation of 200 mg every 3 weeks as the RP2D. Randomized dose comparison studies (KN001 B2 and D) showing similar efficacy over a fivefold dose/exposure range confirmed the RP2D as the pivotal dose.

A six-weekly dosing schedule for pembrolizumab in patients with cancer based on evaluation using modelling and simulation.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is approved for multiple cancer types at 200 mg and 2 mg/kg dose every 3 weeks (Q3W). We used a model-based approach to compare the exposure of pembrolizumab 400 mg dose every 6 weeks (Q6W) with the Q3W regimens. METHODS: The Q6W dose was selected by matching exposure with the 200 mg and 2 mg/kg Q3W doses. Concentration-time profiles were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model of pembrolizumab based on 2993 subjects from five clinical trials across tumour types. Efficacy was bridged by evaluating projections of average concentration over the dosing interval (Cavg) and trough concentration (Cmin) at steady state (ss). Safety was bridged by ensuring that concentrations were below those at 10 mg/kg dose every 2 weeks (Q2W), the maximum clinical dose. RESULTS: The 400 mg Q6W dose had similar predicted exposure (Cavg,ss, geometric mean âˆ¼1% higher) as the 200 mg Q3W dose. Fewer than 1% of subjects had transiently lower Cmin,ss than that observed for 200 mg and 2 mg/kg Q3W. Despite these reductions, similar target saturation is expected. The predicted peak concentrations (Cmax,ss) for 400 mg Q6W were substantially (∼65%) lower than the 10 mg/kg Q2W dose. CONCLUSIONS: Exposures expected for pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W were similar to the 200 mg and 2 mg/kg Q3W and below the 10 mg/kg Q2W regimens. Established exposure-response relationships for pembrolizumab over a 5-fold dose range (2 mg/kg Q3W to 10 mg Q2W) support that clinical efficacy and safety of 400 mg Q6W would be similar to the 200 mg and 2 mg/kg Q3W doses across tumour types. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01295827, NCT01704287, NCT01866319, NCT01905657, NCT02142738.

Thorough QTc Study of a Single Supratherapeutic Dose of Relebactam in Healthy Participants.

The effects of supratherapeutic doses of intravenous (IV) relebactam on duration of ventricular depolarization and subsequent repolarization were assessed in a thorough QT/corrected QT study. This was a single-dose, double-blind (relebactam only), randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, 3-period, balanced crossover study in healthy participants. Participants received in randomized order, and separated by a washout (≥4 days), a single dose of IV relebactam 1150 mg, oral moxifloxacin 400 mg (open-label positive control), and IV placebo. Least squares mean and 2-sided 90% confidence interval for change from baseline in population-derived corrected QT intervals for relebactam, moxifloxacin, and placebo were estimated for 24 hours. The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval of all least squares mean population-derived corrected QT treatment differences from placebo was not >10 milliseconds at any time point for 24 hours. Corrected QT assay sensitivity was confirmed with moxifloxacin treatment. Analysis of electrocardiogram parameters resulted in no additional cardiac safety concerns. Overall, a supratherapeutic dose of relebactam yielded no cardiac safety events; the 1150-mg supratherapeutic dose (4.6-fold above the 250-mg therapeutic dose) was not associated with QT prolongation or other abnormal cardiodynamic parameters. This study lends additional support to relebactam's use as a ß-lactamase inhibitor in antimicrobial therapy.

Impact of renal impairment and human organic anion transporter inhibition on pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of relebactam combined with imipenem and cilastatin.

AIMS: Two phase 1, open-label studies were conducted to investigate the effect of renal impairment (RI) and organic anion transporter (OAT) inhibition on pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of relebactam (REL) plus imipenem/cilastatin (IMI). METHODS: Study PN005 evaluated the PK of REL (125 mg) plus IMI (250 mg) in participants with RI vs healthy controls. Study PN019 evaluated the PK of REL (250 mg) and imipenem (500 mg; dosed as IMI) with/without probenecid (1 g; OAT inhibitor) in healthy adults. RESULTS: Geometric mean ratios (RI/healthy matched controls) of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ; 90% confidence interval) for REL, imipenem and cilastatin increased as RI increased from mild (1.6 [1.1, 2.4], 1.4 [1.1, 1.8] and 1.6 [1.0, 2.5], respectively) to severe (4.9 [3.4, 7.0], 2.5 [1.9, 3.3] and 5.6 [3.6, 8.6], respectively). For all 3 analytes, plasma and renal clearance decreased and corresponding plasma apparent terminal half-life increased with increasing RI. Geometric mean ratios ([probenecid+IMI/REL]/[IMI/REL]) of plasma exposure for REL and imipenem were 1.24 (1.19, 1.28) and 1.16 (1.13, 1.20), respectively. The dose fraction excreted (fe) in the urine decreased progressively from mild to severe RI. Probenecid reduced renal clearance of REL and imipenem by 25 and 31%, respectively. Compared with IMI/REL, coadministration of IMI/REL with probenecid yielded lower fe for REL and imipenem. In both studies, treatment was well tolerated; there were no serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: RI increased plasma exposure and similarly decreased clearance of REL, imipenem and cilastatin; IMI/REL dose adjustment (fixed-ratio) will be required for patients with RI. Probenecid had no clinically meaningful impact on the PK of REL or imipenem.

Current treatment landscape for patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), an aggressive histological subtype, has poor prognosis. Chemotherapy remains standard of care for mTNBC, although no agent has been specifically approved for this breast cancer subtype. Instead, chemotherapies approved for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are used for mTNBC (National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines [NCCN] v1.2019). Atezolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel was recently approved for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive locally advanced or metastatic TNBC. Published historical data were reviewed to characterize the efficacy of NCCN-recommended (v1.2016) agents as first-line (1L) and second-line or later (2L+) treatment for patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic TNBC (collectively termed mTNBC herein). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed, examining clinical efficacy of therapies for mTNBC based on NCCN v1.2016 guideline recommendations. Data from 13 studies, either published retrospective mTNBC subgroup analyses based on phase III trials in MBC or phase II trials in mTNBC, were included. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of mTNBC subgroups from three phase III trials in 1L MBC reported pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 23%, median overall survival (OS) of 17.5 months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.4 months with single-agent chemotherapy. In two subgroup analyses from a phase III study and a phase II trial (n = 40 each), median duration of response (DOR) to 1L chemotherapy for mTNBC was 4.4-6.6 months; therefore, responses were not durable. A meta-analysis of seven cohorts showed the pooled ORR for 2L+ chemotherapy was 11% (95% CI, 9-14%). Median DOR to 2L+ chemotherapy in mTNBC was also limited (4.2-5.9 months) per two subgroup analyses from a phase III study. No combination chemotherapy regimens recommended by NCCN v1.2016 for treatment of MBC showed superior OS to single agents. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapies have limited effectiveness and are associated with unfavorable toxicity profiles, highlighting a considerable unmet medical need for improved therapeutic options in mTNBC. In addition to the recently approved combination of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel for PD-L1-positive mTNBC, new treatments resulting in durable clinical responses, prolonged survival, and manageable safety profile would greatly benefit patients with mTNBC.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis for Imipenem-Relebactam in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Bacterial Infections.

Relebactam is a small-molecule ß-lactamase inhibitor developed as a fixed-dose combination with imipenem/cilastatin. The pharmacokinetics of relebactam and imipenem across 10 clinical studies were analyzed using data from adult healthy volunteers and patients with bacterial infections. Renal function estimated by creatinine clearance significantly affected the clearance of both compounds, whereas weight and health status were of less clinical significance. Simulations were used to calculate probability of joint target attainment (ratio of free drug area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for relebactam and percentage of time the free drug concentration exceeded the MIC for imipenem) for the proposed imipenem/relebactam dose of 500/250 mg, with adjustments for patients with renal impairment, administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion four times daily. These dosing regimens provide sufficient antibacterial coverage (MIC ≤ 4 µg/mL) for all renal groups.

Immunogenicity of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab is a potent, humanized, monoclonal anti-programmed death 1 antibody that has demonstrated effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety in multiple tumor types. Therapeutic biologics can result in the development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs), which may alter drug clearance and neutralize target binding, potentially reducing drug efficacy; such immunogenicity may also result in infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, and immune complex disorders. Pembrolizumab immunogenicity and its impact on exposure, safety, and efficacy was assessed in this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pembrolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 3655 patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in 12 clinical studies. Patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, urothelial cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma were treated with pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 200 mg every 3 weeks. An additional study involving 496 patients with stage III melanoma treated with 200 mg adjuvant pembrolizumab every 3 weeks after complete resection was analyzed separately. RESULTS: Of 3655 patients, 2000 were evaluable for immunogenicity analysis, 36 (1.8%) were treatment-emergent (TE) ADA-positive; 9 (0.5%) of these TE-positive patients had antibodies with neutralizing capacity. The presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs did not impact pembrolizumab exposure, nor did pembrolizumab immunogenicity affect the incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) or infusion-related reactions. There was no clear relationship between the presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs and changes in tumor size across treatment regimens. Of the 496 patients treated with pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy, 495 were evaluable, 17 (3.4%) were TE ADA-positive; none had neutralizing antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TE (neutralizing positive) ADAs against pembrolizumab was low in patients with advanced tumors. Furthermore, immunogenicity did not appear to have any clinically relevant effects on the exposure, safety, or efficacy of pembrolizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827 (February 15, 2011), NCT01704287 (October 11, 2012), NCT01866319 (May 31, 2013), NCT01905657 (July 23, 2013), NCT02142738 (May 20, 2014), NCT01848834 (May 8, 2013), NCT02255097 (October 2, 2014), NCT02460198 (June 2, 2015), NCT01953692 (October 1, 2013), NCT02453594 (May 25, 2015), NCT02256436 (October 3, 2014), NCT02335424 (January 9, 2015), NCT02362594 (February 13, 2015).

Simplification of Imipenem Dosing by Removal of Weight-Based Adjustments.

In patients with renal insufficiency, dose adjustments based on creatinine clearance and body weight have been a component of imipenem dosage instructions. The objective of the current analysis was to provide revised dosing recommendations by evaluating the impact of creatinine clearance and body weight on the pharmacokinetics of imipenem. A population pharmacokinetics model was developed with data from 465 patients and 3300 pharmacokinetic samples. Simulations provided data to support revision of the dosing recommendations to remove body weight-adjusted dosing, and the analysis formed the basis for updates that are reflected on the current imipenem label for both the United States and Europe. The optimized regimen provided an advantage in terms of improved target attainment at breakpoint minimum inhibitory concentration values of 1 and 2 µg/mL, as low-body-weight patients maintained >90% probability of target attainment compared to <90% probability of target attainment achieved with the previously approved regimen. It was concluded that additional dose adjustments for body weight were not necessary and the new scheme would simplify dosing while maintaining patient safety and efficacy.

Clinical outcomes with therapies for previously treated recurrent/metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC): A systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: A wide range of objective response rates (ORRs: 0-53%) among available treatments in patients with R/M HNSCC with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy (PBT) renders treatment selection a challenge. This systematic literature review (SLR) was intended to aid clinical decision-making by classifying historical studies to accurately characterize the response in second-line (progression on/after platinum-based therapy), and third-line (progression on/after platinum and cetuximab/other drug) settings. METHODS: SLR was performed to characterize the ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with therapies recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Clinical trials published in English between January 1, 1985, and September 30, 2016 were identified by searching the PubMed (Medline), Cochrane, and Embase databases. RESULTS: The SLR identified 34 key studies in second-line R/M HNSCC patients, and one of these included a third-line patient cohort. However, several studies did not enrol a strictly second-line population. Response in a true second-line setting was elucidated by categorizing the studies using a novel framework defined according to the extent to which enrolled patients were second-line. Only seven studies were strictly second-line, with an estimated pooled ORR of 4% (95% CI = 2-8%; N = 414) for methotrexate and 11% (95% CI = 7-15%; N = 235) for cetuximab, and a reported ORR of 14% (N = 78) from a single study of paclitaxel. The median DOR was limited with cetuximab (∼4 months) and paclitaxel (∼7 months), and not reported for methotrexate. Median PFS or time to progression (TTP) ranged from 1.7 to 3.5 months, and median OS from 4.3 to 6.7 months. The ORR in the only third-line study was 0% (95% CI = 0-7; N = 53) for the platinum + cetuximab combination. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasize the historically bleak prognoses in patients with R/M HNSCC following PBT progression. Anti-PD-1 therapies, namely pembrolizumab and nivolumab, represent novel treatment options that may improve clinical outcomes.

Phase 2, Dose-Ranging Study of Relebactam with Imipenem-Cilastatin in Subjects with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection.

Relebactam (REL [MK-7655]) is a novel class A/C ß-lactamase inhibitor intended for use with imipenem for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. REL restores imipenem activity against some resistant strains of Klebsiella and Pseudomonas In this multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial (NCT01506271), subjects who were ≥18 years of age with complicated intra-abdominal infection were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 250 mg REL, 125 mg REL, or placebo, each given intravenously (i.v.) with 500 mg imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) every 6 h (q6h) for 4 to 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of microbiologically evaluable (ME) subjects with a favorable clinical response at discontinuation of i.v. therapy (DCIV). A total of 351 subjects were randomized, 347 (99%) were treated, and 255 (73%) were ME at DCIV (55% male; mean age, 49 years). The most common diagnoses were complicated appendicitis (53%) and complicated cholecystitis (17%). Thirty-six subjects (13%) had imipenem-resistant Gram-negative infections at baseline. Both REL doses plus IMI were generally well tolerated and demonstrated safety profiles similar to that of IMI alone. Clinical response rates at DCIV were similar in subjects who received 250 mg REL plus IMI (96.3%) or 125 mg REL plus IMI (98.8%), and both were noninferior to IMI alone (95.2%; one-sided P < 0.001). The treatment groups were also similar with respect to clinical response at early and late follow-up and microbiological response at all visits. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulations show that imipenem exposure at the proposed dose of 500 mg IMI with 250 mg REL q6h provides coverage of >90% of carbapenem-resistant bacterial strains.

Pooled population pharmacokinetic model of imipenem in plasma and the lung epithelial lining fluid.

AIMS: Several clinical trials have confirmed the therapeutic benefit of imipenem for treatment of lung infections. There is however no knowledge of the penetration of imipenem into the lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF), the site of action relevant for lung infections. Furthermore, although the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of imipenem has been widely studied, most studies have been based on selected patient groups. The aim of this analysis was to characterize imipenem plasma PK across populations and to quantify imipenem ELF penetration. METHODS: A population model for imipenem plasma PK was developed using data obtained from healthy volunteers, elderly subjects and subjects with renal impairment, in order to identify predictors for inter-individual variability (IIV) of imipenem PK. Subsequently, a clinical study which measured plasma and ELF concentrations of imipenem was included in order to quantify lung penetration. RESULTS: A two compartmental model best described the plasma PK of imipenem. Creatinine clearance and body weight were included as subject characteristics predictive for IIV on clearance. Typical estimates for clearance, central and peripheral volume, and inter-compartmental clearance were 11.5 l h(-1) , 9.37 l, 6.41 l, 13.7 l h(-1) , respectively (relative standard error (RSE) <8%). The distribution of imipenem into ELF was described using a time-independent penetration coefficient of 0.44 (RSE 14%). CONCLUSION: The identified lung penetration coefficient confirms the clinical relevance of imipenem for treatment of lung infections, while the population PK model provided insights into predictors of IIV for imipenem PK and may be of relevance to support dose optimization in various subject groups.

Genetics-based pediatric warfarin dosage regimen derived using pharmacometric bridging.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin dosage regimens using CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms have been extensively studied in adults and is included in US Food and Drug Administration-approved warfarin labeling. However, no dosage algorithm is available for pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To derive a genetics-based pediatric dosge regimen for warfarin, including starting dose and titration scheme. METHODS: A model-based approach was developed based on a previously validated warfarin dosage model in adults, with subsequent comparison to pediatric data from pediatric warfarin dose, genotyping, and international normalized ratio (INR) results. The adult model was based on a previously established model from the CROWN (CReating an Optimal Warfarin dosing Nomogram) trial. Pediatric warfarin data were obtained from a study conducted at the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles with 26 subjects. Variant alleles of CYP2C9 (rs1799853 or *2, and rs1057910 or *3) and the VKORC1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9923231 (-1639 G>A) were assessed, where the rs numbers are reference SNP identification tags assigned by the National Center for Biotechnology Information. RESULTS: A pediatric warfarin model was derived using the previously validated model and clinical pharmacology considerations. The model was validated, and clinical trial simulation and stochastic modeling were used to optimize pediatric dosage and titration. The final dosage regimen was optimized based on simulations targeting a high (≥60%) proportion of INRs within the therapeutic range by week 2 of warfarin therapy while minimizing INRs >3.5 or <2. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed pediatric warfarin dosage scheme based on individual CYP2C9 (alleles *1,*2,*3) and VKORC1 rs9923231 (-1639 G>A) genotypes may offer improved dosage compared to current treatment strategies, especially in patients with variant CYP2C9 and VKORC1 alleles. This pilot study provides the foundation for a larger prospective evaluation of genetics-based warfarin dosage in pediatric patients.