Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(7): 1230-1234, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36918323

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Mortality related to CDH is high, but with great variability among centers. There are few studies on patients with this condition born in South America which show poor outcomes. The goal of this study is to present the outcome of CDH in several high-volume quaternary centers in South America, ascertain the factors associated with lower mortality in our population, and compare our outcomes to those of the CDH Study Group (CDHSG). METHODS: The data from two South American centers were retrospectively analyzed and compared with contemporary data from other CDHSG participating centers. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were also evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2018, the two South American centers saw 335 patients with CDH with an overall survival rate of 73.1%. Survival for the high, intermediate, and low-risk groups as determined by the Brindle score was 50%, 70%, and 87%, respectively. In our cohort the strongest predictors of mortality were ECMO use and early PaCO2. There were no significant differences in mortality between the two South American centers and the other CDHSG centers when adjusted by risk score, however, the South American centers had higher use of ECMO in the intermediate-risk group. DISCUSSION: Quaternary South American centers had similar outcomes to CDHSG centers worldwide. The availability and coordination of centralized dedicated care allow more efficient use of scarce technical and professional resources in patients with CDH. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Humanos , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , América del Sur/epidemiología
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 42(9): 1533-8, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17848244

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) in many patients is diagnosed in utero. In these patients, the delivery can be planned as an elective cesarean, induced vaginal, or spontaneous vaginal delivery. The optimal method has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with CDH delivered by different methods. METHODS: The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group was formed in 1995 to compile data on liveborn babies with CDH. Beginning in 2001, data concerning delivery were collected. By October 2005, delivery data were available on 1039 term and near-term infants without cardiac malformations. Five hundred forty-eight had a prenatal diagnosis and complete data on delivery (194 delivered by elective cesarean delivery, 121 by induced vaginal delivery, and 233 by spontaneous vaginal delivery). Patients delivered by a nonelective cesarean delivery were assigned to the delivery group for which they were originally planned. RESULTS: The overall survival among the 548 patients was 69%. It was highest in patients delivered by cesarean delivery (71%) followed by those delivered through induced vaginal delivery (70%) and spontaneous vaginal delivery (67%). The difference was not statistically significant. Fifty-three percent of all patients survived without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This was significantly higher after cesarean delivery (60%) than after induced vaginal delivery (49%) or spontaneous vaginal delivery (49%) (P < .05). At 30 days of age, 45% of the patients delivered by cesarean delivery had survived and were on room air. This was slightly lower after induced vaginal delivery (37%) or after spontaneous vaginal delivery (37%), although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery was associated with a slightly better outcome in terms of a significantly higher survival without the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, although there was no significant difference in total survival. Because this study was not randomized, it is not possible to determine if the elective cesarean delivery was the cause for the better outcome or if centers favoring elective cesarean delivery by protocol are more skillful in the management of patients with CDH. Mode of delivery for term and near-term infants with CDH deserves further prospective study.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Hernia Diafragmática/diagnóstico , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Peso al Nacer , Cesárea , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Hernia Diafragmática/mortalidad , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Embarazo , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...