Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: Because breast-conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy alone, and mastectomy with reconstruction are equally effective for the treatment of early stage breast carcinoma, women's choice among them often focuses on quality-of-life (QOL) issues. Information regarding QOL after these surgical treatments could help women with this decision. METHODS: Participants in this prospective study were women, age 30-85 years, with newly diagnosed breast carcinoma who underwent BCS (n = 103), mastectomy alone (n = 55), or mastectomy with reconstruction (n = 40). Quality of life was assessed after diagnosis (baseline) and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after baseline by using the Mischel Uncertainty in Illness Scale, Profile of Mood States, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Breast Cancer. RESULTS: In multivariate regression analyses controlling for the QOL score obtained at baseline, age, and type of nonsurgical treatment, women who underwent mastectomy with reconstruction had greater mood disturbance (P = 0.002) and poorer well-being (P = 0.002) after baseline than women who had mastectomy alone; these differences remained 18 months after surgery. Although similar analyses also showed that women who underwent BCS had more mood disturbance than women who had mastectomy alone, this difference was significant only at 12 months after baseline. The BCS and mastectomy-only group did not differ significantly regarding well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Aspects of QOL other than body image are not better in women who undergo BCS or mastectomy with reconstruction than in women who have mastectomy alone. In fact, mastectomy with reconstruction is associated with greater mood disturbance and poorer well-being.

Educating patients on sentinel lymph node dissection for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This article reviews the current literature on lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) for breast cancer and presents educational information for patients who are considering undergoing this procedure. OVERVIEW: Lymphatic mapping with SLND has been tested widely in patients with breast cancer, primarily in the context of clinical trials. Research studies have found a high degree of accuracy, with the sentinel lymph node (SLN) predicting the status of the axillary node basin. The ability of the surgeon to identify the SLN and the accuracy of the technique correlate with the number of procedures conducted. With the increase in the number of patients having lymphatic mapping and SLND for breast cancer who may not be part of a clinical trial, there is a need for educational materials to help clinicians teach patients about the procedure. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Because of the complexity of the information, patients need both written and verbal information to decide whether to undergo an SLND. In the setting of a clinical trial, patient education materials add to the informed consent document. As the use of SLND for breast cancer becomes more common, the need for clear, concise, informative patient education materials is even more imperative.

Effects of advanced nursing care on quality of life and cost outcomes of women diagnosed with breast cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and cost outcomes of advanced practice nurses' (APNs') interventions with women diagnosed with breast cancer. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Integrated healthcare system in a midwestern suburban community. SAMPLE: 210 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer with an age range of 30-85 years. METHODS: The control group (n = 104) received standard medical care. The intervention group (n = 106) received standard care plus APN interventions based on Brooten's cost-quality model and the Oncology Nursing Society's standards of advanced practice in oncology nursing QOL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale and Profile of Mood States at seven intervals over two years. Information about costs (charges and reimbursement) was collected through billing systems. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Uncertainty, mood states, well-being, charges, and reimbursement. FINDINGS: Uncertainty decreased significantly more from baseline in the intervention versus control group at one, three, and six months after diagnosis (p = 0.001, 0.026, and 0.011, respectively), with the strongest effect on subscales of complexity, inconsistency, and unpredictability. Unmarried women and women with no family history of breast cancer benefited from nurse interventions in mood states and well-being. No significant cost differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: APN interventions improved some QOL indicators but did not raise or lower costs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The first six months after breast cancer diagnosis is a critical time during which APN interventions can improve QOL outcomes. More research is necessary to define cost-effective interventions.

Women's approaches to decision making about mammography.

Health professionals have an obligation to understand women's decision making about mammography and to advocate for their active participation in health care decision making. Although mammography is a major screening measure for the second largest cancer killer of women, only approximately half of women older than age 50 years, and fewer older than age 70 years, undergo mammography in accordance with American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify women's overall decision-making approaches when considering mammography. Subjects were a purposive, convenience sample of 50 women in the community who had made a decision about mammography; they included those who chose to have mammograms and those who decided not to have mammograms according to the pre-1997 ACS guidelines. Subjects participated in audiotaped interviews. Results indicated that women approached the mammography decision differently, regardless of the decision they made. Three overall decision-making approaches to addressing risk factors, issues about mammography, or other factors before their decision were evident. The approaches were (1) thoughtful consideration; (2) cursory consideration; and (3) little or no consideration. Each approach has implications for nurses who assist women in making decisions about mammography.

Options, outcomes, values, likelihoods decision-making guide for patients and their families.

When family caregivers are faced with making daily decisions, they may feel burdened, frustrated, and even in conflict with other family members. The OOVL Guide is a tool to help people think about the various aspects of a decision situation and combine them to make a decision. The OOVL Guide supports nurses in their advocacy role because it affirms the importance of the clients' values and preferences. The OOVL Guide provides decision-makers, both professionals and lay people, with a structure and procedure for making choices for themselves or others.