The Analgesia Nociception Index: a pilot study to evaluation of a new pain parameter during labor.

BACKGROUND: Objective pain assessment that is not subject to influences from either cultural or comprehension issues is desirable. Analysis of heart rate variability has been proposed as a potential method. This pilot study aimed to assess the performance of the PhysioDoloris™ analgesia monitor which calculates an Analgesia Nociception Index derived from heart rate variability. It was compared with visual analogical pain scores. METHODS: Forty-five parturients who requested epidural analgesia were recruited. Simultaneous couplets of pain scores and Analgesia Nociception Index values were recorded every 5 min regardless of the presence or absence of uterine contractions. The relationship between indices was characterized, and a cut-off value of Analgesia Nociception Index corresponding to a visual analogical score >30 (range 0-100) was used to determine the positive and negative predictive value of the Analgesia Nociception Index. RESULTS: There was a negative linear relationship between visual analogical pain scores and Analgesia Nociception Index values regardless of the presence of uterine contractions (regression coefficient ± SEM=-0.18 ± 0.032 for entire dataset). Uterine contraction significantly reduced the Analgesia Nociception Index (P<0.0001). Using a visual analogical pain score >30 to define a painful sensation, the lower 95% confidence limit for the Analgesia Nociception Index score was 49. CONCLUSION: The Analgesia Nociception Index has an inverse linear relationship with visual analogical pain scores. Further studies are necessary to confirm the results of this pilot study and to look at the influence of epidural analgesia on the Analgesia Nociception Index.

Effect of age on the comparability of bispectral and state entropy indices during the maintenance of propofol-sufentanil anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Manufacturers recommend maintaining anaesthesia at a bispectral index (BIS) or state entropy (SE) index value between 40 and 60. METHODS: We prospectively studied 102 patients receiving propofol-sufentanil anaesthesia administered by anaesthetists blinded to these indices. The main endpoint was crude agreement (P(0)), defined as the proportion of agreement between BIS and SE index among three categories: <40, between 40 and 60, and >60. Discrepancies in recommendation (DR) were also considered. A DR is type 1 if BIS or SE is <40, while the other is simultaneously >60. A DR is type 2 when BIS and SE index values are on different sides of a threshold (40 or 60) with three subtypes according to the magnitude of their difference. A linear multiple regression was performed to identify covariates that are independently associated with P(0). RESULTS: In total, 12 147 pairs of values were studied. P(0) was 59.9 (24.5%) [mean (sd)]. Thirty-three patients presented more than 50% discordant pairs and only seven patients presented more than 95% concordant pairs. Type 1 DR occurred in only 1.1% of all the pairs. The median (inter-quartile range) number of type 2 DR varied from 5 (3-8) to 2 (1-3) according to the degree of difference. Multivariate analysis showed that age (P=0.0004) and electrode position (P=0.0084) were independently associated with P(0). An increase in the age of 10 yr decreases P(0) by 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between BIS and SE indices is moderate and deteriorates as patients' age increases. This study cannot determine which index is best adapted for elderly patients. Additional work comparing both indices with raw EEG traces is warranted.

Effects of propofol vs sevoflurane on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation.

BACKGROUND: The inhibitory effect of anaesthetic agents on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction may depend upon their dose, especially when using a volatile agent. The aim of this randomized open study was to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol, as primary anaesthetic agents, on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation (OLV), with their administration being adjusted to maintain bispectral index (BIS) values between 40 and 60. METHODS: Eighty patients scheduled for a lobectomy, receiving an epidural mixture of ropivacaine and sufentanil, were randomly assigned to Group S (maintenance with sevoflurane) or Group P (maintenance with propofol). After placement of a double-lumen tube, the lungs were ventilated at an inspiratory fraction of oxygen of 1.0, a tidal volume of 6 ml kg(-1), and 12 bpm. Arterial blood gas samples were taken as follows: during two-lung ventilation before OLV, and during the first 40 min of OLV. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were excluded (incorrect placement of the tube or BIS outside the desired range). The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic variables, haemodynamic, and BIS levels during the operation. Four patients in each group had a Sp(O2)<90%. Mean of the lowest Pa(O2) was 16.3 (7.5) kPa in Group S and 17.7 (9.3) kPa in Group P (ns). CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane and propofol had similar effect on Pa(O2) during OLV when their administration is titrated to maintain BIS between 40 and 60.