Differential actinodin1 regulation in zebrafish and mouse appendages.

The fin-to-limb transition is an important evolutionary step in the colonization of land and diversification of all terrestrial vertebrates. We previously identified a gene family in zebrafish, termed actinodin, which codes for structural proteins crucial for the formation of actinotrichia, rigid fibrils of the teleost fin. Interestingly, this gene family is absent from all tetrapod genomes examined to date, suggesting that it was lost during limb evolution. To shed light on the disappearance of this gene family, and the consequences on fin-to-limb transition, we characterized actinodin regulatory elements. Using fluorescent reporters in transgenic zebrafish, we identified tissue-specific cis-acting regulatory elements responsible for actinodin1 (and1) expression in the ectodermal and mesenchymal cell populations of the fins, respectively. Mutagenesis of potential transcription factor binding sites led to the identification of one binding site crucial for and1 expression in ectodermal cells. We show that these regulatory elements are partially functional in mouse limb buds in a tissue-specific manner. Indeed, the zebrafish regulatory elements target expression to the dorsal and ventral ectoderm of mouse limb buds. Absence of expression in the apical ectodermal ridge is observed in both mouse and zebrafish. However, cells of the mouse limb bud mesoderm do not express the transgene, in contrast to zebrafish. Altogether these results hint for a change in regulation of and1 during evolution that led to the downregulation and eventual loss of this gene from tetrapod genomes.

Model-based drug development: a rational approach to efficiently accelerate drug development.

The pharmaceutical industry continues to face significant challenges. Very few compounds that enter development reach the marketplace, and the investment required for each success can surpass $1.8 billion. Despite attempts to improve efficiency and increase productivity, total investment continues to rise whereas the output of new medicines declines. With costs increasing exponentially through each development phase, it is failure in phase II and phase III that is most wasteful. In today's development paradigm, late-stage failure is principally a result of insufficient efficacy. This is manifested as either a failure to differentiate sufficiently from placebo (shown for both novel and precedented mechanisms) or a failure to demonstrate sufficient differentiation from existing compounds. Set in this context, this article will discuss the role model-based drug development (MBDD) approaches can and do play in accelerating and optimizing compound development strategies through a series of illustrative examples.

Comparative efficacy and effectiveness: an opportunity for clinical pharmacology.

Over the past 10 or more years, the drug development paradigm has shifted radically as a consequence of the availability of generic formulations for many important drugs and the growing influence of major payers in controlling reimbursement of new medicines. The demand for health care in an aging and increasingly information-seeking population is steadily outstripping society's ability to pay for all possible treatments. Regulatory approval of new drugs is necessary but no longer sufficient for market access in many countries, including the United States.

Comparison of QTc data analysis methods recommended by the ICH E14 guidance and exposure-response analysis: case study of a thorough QT study of asenapine.

An assessment of the effects of asenapine on QTc interval in patients with schizophrenia revealed a discrepancy between the results obtained by two different methods: an intersection-union test (IUT) (as recommended in the International Conference on Harmonisation E14 guidance) and an exposure-response (E-R) analysis. Simulations were performed in order to understand and reconcile this discrepancy. Although estimates of the time-matched, placebo-corrected mean change in QTc from baseline (ddQTc) at peak plasma concentrations from the E-R analysis ranged from 2 to 5 ms per dose level, the IUT applied to simulated data from the E-R model yielded maximum ddQTc estimates of 7-10 ms for the various doses of asenapine. These results indicate that the IUT can produce biased estimates that may induce a high false-positive rate in individual thorough QTc trials. In such cases, simulations from an E-R model can aid in reconciling the results from the two methods and may support the use of E-R results as a basis for labeling.

Drug development perspective on pharmacokinetic studies of new drugs in patients with renal impairment.

Severe renal impairment can, through diverse mechanisms, alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs that are renally eliminated and even of some drugs that are nonrenally eliminated. Consequently, dose adjustment for new molecular entities in patients with renal insufficiency is a critical issue in drug development. Clinical pharmacology studies undertaken in patients with renal impairment are generally quite small. We therefore recommend that all pertinent pharmacokinetic data relating to subjects with different degrees of renal impairment and from different clinical trials, including population pharmacokinetic evaluation, form the basis for dosage recommendations in renal impairment. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation has gained popularity for renal insufficiency classification, but traditional equations such as the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) formula should enjoy continued use so as to avoid confusion, particularly for drugs for which dosing guidelines have previously been developed.

The use of a clinical utility index to compare insomnia compounds: a quantitative basis for benefit-risk assessment.

The use of a clinical utility index (CUI) was proposed in order to compare two calcium channel alpha2delta ligands that were in development for the treatment of insomnia. The important attributes included in the CUI were two measures of residual sedation and five measures of efficacy (wake after sleep onset, sleep quality, sleep latency, and sleep stages (stage 1 and stages 3-4)). Dose-response analyses were conducted on each end point, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine a clinically meaningful difference in CUI. Nonparametric bootstrap parameters were used to build confidence intervals (CIs). Peak CUI (80% CI) was 0.345 (0.25-0.43), observed at a dose of approximately 30 mg with the lead compound and 0.436 (0.35-0.52) observed at >600-mg dose for the backup. Although CUI was slightly greater for the backup, peak CUI values were observed at doses that were not considered viable, and therefore development of the ligand was discontinued. The use of the CUI allowed an efficient, quantitative, and transparent decision.

Model-based drug development.

The low productivity and escalating costs of drug development have been well documented over the past several years. Less than 10% of new compounds that enter clinical trials ultimately make it to the market, and many more fail in the preclinical stages of development. These challenges in the "critical path" of drug development are discussed in a 2004 publication by the US Food and Drug Administration. The document emphasizes new tools and various opportunities to improve drug development. One of the opportunities recommended is the application of "model-based drug development (MBDD)." This paper discusses what constitutes the key elements of MBDD and how these elements should fit together to inform drug development strategy and decision-making.

Nontraditional approaches to first-in-human studies to increase efficiency of drug development: will microdose studies make a significant impact?

Much has been written recently about low productivity in the pharmaceutical industry and the high cost of drug development. Over a 10-year period ending in 2000, only approximately 11% of compounds tested in humans across 10 large pharmaceutical companies were eventually approved for marketing in the United States and/or Europe. Attrition was highest during phase II (62%) but still significant in phase III (45%) and at the time of registration (23%). Clearly, given the high cost and time required for clinical development, these late-stage failures are unsustainable.

Population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA) in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium in cancer patients enrolled in four different open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized phase II studies. METHODS: Pemetrexed disodium was administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion (600 mg/m2) every 21 days. A total of four blood samples were to be collected each cycle per patient (n= 103 patients) during cycles 1 and 3. Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling using NONMEM to estimate pemetrexed disodium pharmacokinetic parameters (mean, and between- and within-patient variability) as well as relationships between the pharmacokinetic parameters and various patient-specific factors (demographic and physiologic data). RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium were best characterized by a two-compartment model with initial distribution and terminal elimination half-lives of 0.63 h and 2.73 h, respectively. The typical value of systemic clearance (CL) in liters per hour included a relationship to creatinine clearance (CrCL) with a slope of 0.0292. Typical values of central volume (V(c)), distributional CL (Q), and peripheral volume (V(p)) were 11.3 1, 3.21 l/h, and 5.20 l, respectively. Between-patient variability was 19.6%, 15.6%, and 21.7% for CL, V(c), and V(p), respectively. A combined additive/proportional error model was used to describe residual variability, with a coefficient of variation of 23.7% for the proportional component and a standard deviation of 0.0410 microg/ml for the additive component. Significant patient-specific factors on CL were calculated CrCL, body weight, and to a lesser extent alanine transaminase and folate deficiency. Gender and body weight were significant factors on V(c) while both body surface area and albumin were significant factors on V(p). In conclusion, population pharmacokinetic modeling revealed relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and various patient specific factors.

Impact of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis.

BACKGROUND: Continued scepticism about the benefits of population pharmacokinetics and/or population pharmacodynamics, here referred to collectively as the population approach, hampers its widespread application in drug development. At the same time the sources of this scepticism have not been clearly defined. In an attempt to capture and clearly define these concerns and to help communicate the value of the population approach in drug development at Parke-Davis we conducted a survey of customers within the company. The results of this survey are presented here. METHODS: All drug development programmes conducted over the past 10 years that included a population approach in data analysis and interpretation were identified. A brief description of the population analysis was prepared together with a brief description of how the resulting information was used in each drug development programme. These synopses were forwarded to relevant members of each drug development team together with a survey designed to solicit opinions as to the relevance and impact of these analyses. RESULTS: The most frequent use of information derived from population-based analysis was in labelling. In all cases of drugs making to New Drug Application (NDA) submission the analyses resulted in information that was included in approved or proposed labelling. In almost half of the cases summarised here (5 of 12), population-based analysis was perceived to have resulted in information that influenced the direction of individual development programmes. In many of these cases the information was serendipitous. It is also noted that most of these analyses were not the result of clearly defined objectives and prospective analysis plans. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the population approach, even when applied retrospectively, may have value in complementing or supporting interpretation of other data collected during the course of a trial. Atypical systemic exposure is quickly and easily assessed for correlation with adverse events or exceptional efficacy in retrospective or ad hoc evaluation. Although we know of no direct evidence, it is possible that such use of population pharmacokinetic data has facilitated NDA review and approval by providing insight into the role of atypical systemic drug exposure in otherwise spurious events.

Comparison of different methods to evaluate population dose-response and relative potency: importance of interoccasion variability.

Different mixed-effects models were compared to evaluate the population dose-response and relative potency of two albuterol inhalers. Bronchodilator response was measured after ascending doses of each inhaler in 37 asthmatic patients. A linear mixed-effects model was developed based on the approach proposed by Finney for the evaluation of bioassay data. A nonlinear mixed-effects (Emax) model with interindividual and interoccasion variability (IOV) in the different pharmacodynamic parameters was also fit to the data. Both methods produced a similar estimate of relative potency. However, the estimate of relative potency was 22% lower with the nonlinear mixed-effects model if IOV was not taken into account. Monte Carlo simulations based on a similar study design demonstrated that more biased and variable estimates of ED50 and relative potency were obtained when the nonlinear mixed-effects model ignored the presence of IOV in the data. Furthermore, the linear mixed-effects model that did not account for IOV produced confidence intervals for relative potency that were too narrow and thus could lead to erroneous conclusions. These problems were avoided when the estimation model could account for IOV. Results of the simulations were consistent with those of the experimental data. Although the linear or the nonlinear mixed-effects model may be used to evaluate population dose-response and relative potency, there are important differences in the assumptions made by each method.

Clinical comparability of albuterol delivered by the breath-actuated inhaler (Spiros) and albuterol by MDI in patients with asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of one and two actuations of albuterol sulfate powder delivered via a breath-actuated, effort-assisted, investigational inhaler (Spiros, Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc) and albuterol delivered via a conventional propellant-driven metered dose inhaler (Ventolin, Glaxo, Inc). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-way crossover study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV1 59% predicted) were enrolled and 44 completed the study. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: FEV1 values over 6 hours were analyzed by ANCOVA and the Finney relative potency model. The relative potency of the inhalers (albuterol MDI: albuterol DPI) was 1.132 (90% CI, 0.680 to 2.252) indicating 1.132 actuations of albuterol MDI provided the same bronchodilation as one actuation of albuterol DPI. ANCOVA analyses further indicated that there were no significant differences between the two delivery systems with respect to FEV1, FVC, FEF25-75%, or PEF. Both inhalers had similar effects on serum potassium levels, QTc interval, blood pressure, and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate asthma in this study, the albuterol DPI was determined to be therapeutically comparable to albuterol MDI in the delivery of one and two actuations of albuterol.

Mixed-effects modeling of the pharmacodynamic response to the calcimimetic agent R-568.

OBJECTIVE: The parathyroid cell calcium receptor is a novel drug target for affecting parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion and for treating hyperparathyroidism. R-568 is a calcium receptor agonist that inhibits PTH secretion and increases calcitonin release in preclinical studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of R-568 on PTH plasma concentrations in humans. METHODS: Eighteen healthy postmenopausal women were included in the study. Single ascending oral doses of 10 to 400 mg were administered in a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial. PTH plasma concentrations were measured for up to 120 hours after each dose. RESULTS: R-568 caused a dose-dependent decrease in plasma PTH, with peak effect observed within 1/2 to 2 hours after dosing. The maximum effect did not increase beyond doses from 80 to 160 mg, but duration of response increased at higher doses. An indirect-response model was developed to estimate the rates of input and output of the active moiety(ies), the inhibitory effect on PTH secretion, and the circadian variability in PTH. Population parameter estimates were 3.02 hour-1 and 0.49 hour-1 for rates of input and output of the active moiety(ies), respectively, IA50 (the unscaled amount of R-568 associated with 50% of Emax) was 16.3 mg, Emax (the maximum effect caused by R-568 expressed as a fraction of the rate of PTH secretion in the absence of any drug effect) was 89%, CPTH(baseline) (the baseline PTH plasma concentration in the absence of any drug effect) was 34.6 pg/mL, KePTH (the elimination rate constant for PTH) was 1.73 hour-1, amplitude of the circadian variability in PTH secretion was 5.8%, and the time of peak PTH secretion occurred at about 6 PM. Intersubject variability in parameter estimates ranged from 7% to 121%, and residual variability was 22%. CONCLUSION: The model correctly described the onset, extent, and duration of effect on PTH after a wide range of doses of R-568.

Truncated area under the curve as a measure of relative extent of bioavailability: evaluation using experimental data and Monte Carlo simulations.

PURPOSE: The use of truncated areas under the curve (AUCs) could be a significant advantage for bioequivalence studies of drugs with long half-lives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of truncated AUCs as measures of relative extent of bioavailability using a large database of experimental data and Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS: The experimental data consisted of 123 single-dose, 2-treatment, crossover studies with at least 18 subjects/study. Monte Carlo techniques were also used to simulate studies that reflected a wide variety of experimental conditions. AUCs were calculated over different time intervals and the standard two one-sided t tests procedure was used to assess bioequivalence. RESULTS: The experimental data showed that conclusions concerning bioequivalence were identical between AUCs truncated at four times the time of peak concentration (Tmax) and AUCs extrapolated to infinity (AUC(inf)) in 120/123 or 97.6% of studies. There was little change in the intra-subject CVs for AUCs truncated at 3*Tmax or later. The results of Monte Carlo simulations were generally consistent with the experimental data and showed that AUCs truncated at 72 hours (AUC(0-72)) performed well compared to AUC(inf) as measures of bioequivalence for drugs with long half-lives. CONCLUSIONS: Based on both the experimental and simulated data, AUCs truncated after the absorption phase perform well as measures of relative extent of bioavailability. Truncated AUCs offer a particular advantage for drugs with long half-lives and these results indicate that it would be reasonable to limit the sample collection period to 72 hours in bioequivalence studies of oral formulations.

A single-blind, crossover comparison of the pharmacokinetics and cognitive effects of a new diazepam rectal gel with intravenous diazepam.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and cognitive effects of a new diazepam (DZP) rectal gel (Diastat) with intravenously administered DZP. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were enrolled in a single-blind, randomized, double-dummy, two-period, crossover study. Subjects received either 15 mg of DZP rectal gel or 7.5 mg of DZP by intravenous infusion. Blood samples for DZP and desmethyldiazepam analysis were obtained before the dose and from 3 min to 240 h after the dose. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured over the first 24-h period. Subjects also completed five repetitions of a neuropsychological test battery over the first 8-h period. RESULTS: Diazepam rapidly appeared in plasma after rectal administration, exceeding 200 ng/mL within 15 min and reaching an initial maximum of 373 ng/ml at 45 min and a second maximum of 447 +/- 91.1 ng/ml at approximately 70 min. The absolute bioavailability of DZP rectal gel was 90.4%. Subjects receiving intravenous DZP were less alert and performed less efficiently on the WAIS Digit Symbol test 6 min after the dose. Subjects receiving DZP rectal gel performed less well on the WAIS Digit Span test 1 h after the dose and required more time to complete the Letter Cancellation and Grooved Pegboard tests 1 and 2 h after drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: Diastat displayed rapid, consistent absorption and was well tolerated. Alterations in cognition were mild and dissipated within 4 h of drug administration. This new rectal drug-delivery system offers an easy, safe, and bioavailable method to administer DZP.

Population pharmacokinetics of terfenadine.

PURPOSE: After oral administration of terfenadine, plasma concentrations of the parent drug are usually below the limits of quantitation of conventional analytical methods because of extensive first-pass metabolism. Data are usually reported on the carboxylic acid metabolite (M1) but there are no published reports of pharmacokinetic parameters for terfenadine itself. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of terfenadine. METHODS: Data from 132 healthy male subjects who participated in several different studies were included in this analysis. After an overnight fast, each subject received a single 120 mg oral dose of terfenadine; blood samples were collected for 72 hours. Terfenadine plasma concentrations were measured using HPLC with mass spectrometry detection and M1 plasma concentrations were measured using HPLC with fluorescence detection. A 2-compartment model was fitted to the terfenadine data using NONMEM; terfenadine and M1 data were also analyzed by noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: Population mean Ka was 2.80 hr-1, Tlag was 0.33 hr, Cl/F was 4.42 x 10(3) 1/hr, Vc/F was 89.8 x 10(3) 1. Q/F was 1.85 x 10(3) 1/hr and Vp/F was 29.1 x 10(3) 1. Intersubject CV ranged from 66 to 244% and the residual intrasubject CV was 21%. Based on noncompartmental methods, mean terfenadine Cmax was 1.54 ng/ml, Tmax was 1.3 hr, t1/2 lambda Z was 15.1 hr, Cl/F was 5.48 x 10(3) 1/hr and V lambda Z/F was 119.2 x 10(3) 1. M1 concentrations exceeded terfenadine concentrations by more than 100 fold and showed less intersubject variability. CONCLUSIONS: Terfenadine disposition was characterized by a 2-compartment model with large intersubject variability, consistent with its significant first-pass effect.

Two- and four-day rifampin chemoprophylaxis regimens induce oxidative metabolism.

The effects of two short-term chemoprophylaxis regimens of rifampin (2 or 4 days) on oxidative metabolism were investigated in 14 healthy subjects. Seven subjects received 600 mg of rifampin twice daily on study days 6 and 7 (group A), and seven subjects received 600 mg of rifampin once daily on days 4, 5, 6, and 7 (group B). Antipyrine (18 mg/kg of body weight) was administered orally on days 1, 8, and 15. Short-term rifampin regimens increased oral clearance of antipyrine in both groups compared with the baseline value (P less than 0.05), and group B displayed a larger percent increase over the baseline value than group A did (70.5 +/- 14.3 versus 33.1 +/- 18.1; P less than 0.05). The partial metabolic clearance (CLM) of antipyrine to 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine (HMA) on day 8 increased 71 and 108% for regimens A and B, respectively (P less than 0.05 for both). The corresponding increases in CLM to norantipyrine (NORA) were 57 and 98% (P less than 0.05 for both). CLM to 4-hydroxyantipyrine (OHA) on day 8 increased 64% for regimen A (P = 0.08) and 97% for regimen B (P less than 0.05) compared with the baseline. Although CLM to HMA and OHA on day 15 remained greater than 50% over the baseline with both regimens, CLM to NORA on day 15 was less than 25% over the baseline with both regimens. Thus, both short-term rifampin chemoprophylaxis regimens increased antipyrine clearance for at least 1 week. The increase tended to be higher with the 4-day regimen. The pattern observed for the CLMS suggests that more than one P-450 enzyme is affected.