Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Psychooncology ; 32(3): 457-464, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36650108

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although unmet support needs are associated with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer caregivers, little is known about the mechanism underlying the relationship between two variables. The self-efficacy (SE) theory and literature suggest that caregiving SE is important in the perception of and reaction to caregiving demands, which in turn affects HRQOL. The aim of this study was to examine whether caregiving SE mediates the relationship between unmet support needs and HRQOL in family caregivers of palliative cancer patients. METHODS: This secondary analysis used the data from 125 family caregivers of palliative cancer patients who were recruited from two public hospitals in Hong Kong. The caregivers completed a survey questionnaire that covered socio-demographic characteristics, unmet support needs, caregiving SE, and HRQOL. Parallel mediation analyses were conducted via SPSS PROCESS macro (Model 4) to test the hypothesized models. RESULTS: The direct effect of unmet support needs on mental HRQOL was significant (effect = -0.49, 95% CI = -0.06 to -0.92). For the indirect effect, only caregiving SE in the domain of 'care for the care recipient' mediated the relationship between unmet support needs and mental HRQOL (effect = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.08 to -0.59). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that caregiving SE may function as a mechanism through which unmet support needs influence mental HRQOL in family caregivers of palliative cancer patients. Healthcare providers should consider developing supportive care interventions to improve caregivers' HRQOL by incorporating effective strategies to enhance SE and reduce unmet needs for this population.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Cuidadores , Autoeficacia , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
BMC Palliat Care ; 20(1): 152, 2021 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627225

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among the few existing needs assessment tools for family carers, the 14-item Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) is the only brief and holistic needs screening tool designed for everyday use in palliative care practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and acceptability of the traditional Chinese version of the CSNAT in palliative care settings in Hong Kong. METHODS: This adopted a cross-sectional and correlation design with repeated measures. The participants were 125 family carers of palliative cancer patients and 10 healthcare providers (HCPs) that were recruited from two local hospitals. The evaluation of psychometric properties included the following: (1) content validity through HCPs including frontline physicians, nurses, social workers, and clinical psychologists; (2) construct validity between the CSNAT items and those of the validated tools that measured caregiver burden, social support, and caregiving self-efficacy; and (3) one-week test-retest reliability in a sub-sample of 81 caregivers. The acceptability of the tool was assessed by the carers using several closed-ended questions. RESULTS: The content validity index of the CSNAT at the scale level was 0.98. Each item of the CSNAT was significantly and moderately correlated with caregiver burden (Spearman's r = 0.24 to 0.50) and caregiving self-efficacy (r = - 0.21 to - 0.52), but not for social support. All CSNAT items had fair to moderate test-retest reliability (weighted kappa = 0.21 to 0.48), with the exception of two items "managing your relatives' symptoms, including giving medicines" and "having time for yourself in the day". Regarding the acceptability of the CSNAT, almost all HCPs were willing to use the CSNAT for carer assessment and support. 89.6% of the carers demonstrated a comprehensibility of the CSNAT tool and 92.9% felt comfortable answering the questions. Around 90% of the carers agreed to use the tool for screening, discussing needs, and making referrals. CONCLUSION: The traditional Chinese version of the CSNAT is a tool with high validity and acceptability and adequate reliability that measures family carers' support needs, which should be considered for wide application in local palliative care practices.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Cuidados Paliativos , China , Estudios Transversales , Hong Kong , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34193435

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The rapid ageing population of Hong Kong has a high demand on oncology and palliative care (PC) service. This study was the first territory-wide assessment in Hong Kong to assess the palliative service coverage in patients with advanced cancer in the past decade. METHODS: Cancer deaths of all 43 public hospitals of Hong Kong were screened. Randomly selected 2800 cancer deaths formed a representative cohort in all seven service clusters of Hospital Authority at 4 time points (2006, 2009, 2012, 2015). Individual patient records were thoroughly reviewed. Predictors of PC coverage was evaluated in univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2015, PC coverage improved steadily from 55.4% to 68.9% (p<0.001). Median time of referral to PC service to death was 25 days (IQR: 53). For duration of inpatient PC, the median time was 22 days (IQR: 44) and it was stable over the past 10 years. Median time of referral to outpatient service to death was 74 days (IQR: 144) and there was an improvement observed (p<0.05). The current system was highly heterogeneous that PC varied between 9.8% and 84.8% in different hospitals depending on the PC service infrastructure. Multivariable Cox model identified patients associated with lower PC coverage: male, <50, rapid disease deterioration and staying in hospitals without multidisciplinary team clinic and designated palliative bed support (all p<0.01). CONCLUSION: There was concrete achievement in palliative service development in the past decade. Heterogeneity and late service provision should be addressed in future.

4.
J Palliat Med ; 24(9): 1314-1320, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33507834

RESUMEN

Background: Integrated palliative care in oncology service has been widely implemented in Hong Kong since 2006. Aim: The study aimed to review its impact on end-of-life outcomes and overall survival (OS) of cancer patients, as well as its utilization of health care resources in the past 10 years. Design: Cancer deaths of all 43 public hospitals of Hong Kong were screened. Setting/Participants: Randomly selected 2800 cancer deaths formed a representative cohort in all seven service clusters of Hospital Authority at four time points (2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015). Individual patient records were thoroughly reviewed. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was employed to compare the survival of patients. Results: Palliative care provision was associated with improved palliative care outcome, including more prescription of strong opioid, fewer cardiopulmonary resuscitations and intensive care unit admissions, and less futile chemotherapy usage in the end-of-life period (all p < 0.001). In the PSM analysis, the median OS in patients with palliative service (5.10 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.52-5.68 months) was significantly better than those without palliative service (1.96 months, 95% CI 1.66-2.27 months). Patients in the palliative care group had more specialist clinic visits (p < 0.001) and longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) in the last six months of life, although the duration of last admission stay at acute general ward was shortened (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggested palliative care has played a role in the remarkable improvement in end-of-life outcomes and OS. However, current palliative care model relied heavily on hospital resources. Future work is needed to strengthen community care and to build up quality monitoring systems.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Cuidado Terminal , Hong Kong , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Palliat Med ; 32(2): 476-484, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28434275

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown positive clinical outcomes of specialist palliative care for end-stage heart failure patients, but cost-effectiveness evaluation is lacking. AIM: To examine the cost-effectiveness of a transitional home-based palliative care program for patients with end-stage heart failure patients as compared to the customary palliative care service. DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial (Trial number: NCT02086305). The costs included pre-program training, intervention, and hospital use. Quality of life was measured using SF-6D. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study took place in three hospitals in Hong Kong. The inclusion criteria were meeting clinical indicators for end-stage heart failure patients including clinician-judged last year of life, discharged to home within the service area, and palliative care referral accepted. A total of 84 subjects (study = 43, control = 41) were recruited. RESULTS: When the study group was compared to the control group, the net incremental quality-adjusted life years gain was 0.0012 (28 days)/0.0077 (84 days) and the net incremental costs per case was -HK$7935 (28 days)/-HK$26,084 (84 days). The probability of being cost-effective was 85% (28 days)/100% (84 days) based on the cost-effectiveness thresholds recommended both by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (£20,000/quality-adjusted life years) and World Health Organization (Hong Kong gross domestic product/capita in 2015, HK$328117). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that a transitional home-based palliative care program is more cost-effective than customary palliative care service. Limitations of the study include small sample size, study confined to one city, clinic consultation costs, and societal costs including patient costs and unpaid care-giving costs were not included.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/patología , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Cuidados Paliativos/economía , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hong Kong , Humanos , Transferencia de Pacientes , Calidad de Vida
6.
Heart ; 102(14): 1100-8, 2016 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26969631

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of home-based transitional palliative care for patients with end-stage heart failure (ESHF) after hospital discharge. METHODS: This was a randomised controlled trial conducted in three hospitals in Hong Kong. The recruited subjects were patients with ESHF who had been discharged home from hospitals and referred for palliative service, and who met the specified inclusion criteria. The interventions consisted of weekly home visits/telephone calls in the first 4 weeks then monthly follow-up, provided by a nurse case manager supported by a multidisciplinary team. The primary outcome measures were any readmission and count of readmissions within 4 and 12 weeks after index discharge, compared using χ(2) tests and Poisson regression, respectively. Secondarily, change in symptoms over time between control and intervention groups were evaluated using generalised estimating equation analyses of data collected using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). RESULTS: The intervention group (n=43) had a significantly lower readmission rate than the control group (n=41) at 12 weeks (intervention 33.6% vs control 61.0% χ(2)=6.8, p=0.009). The mean number (SE) of readmissions for the intervention and control groups was, respectively, 0.42 (0.10) and 1.10 (0.16) and the difference was significant (p=0.001). The relative risk (CI) for 12-week readmissions for the intervention group was 0.55 (0.35 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in readmissions between groups at 4 weeks. However, when compared with the control group, the intervention group experienced significantly higher clinical improvement in depression (45.9% vs 16.1%, p<0.05), dyspnoea (62.2% vs 29.0%, p<0.05) and total ESAS score (73.0% vs 41.4%, p<0.05) at 4 weeks. There were significant differences between groups in changes over time in quality of life (QOL) measured by McGill QOL (p<0.05) and chronic HF (p<0.01) questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of a postdischarge transitional care palliative programme in reducing readmissions and improving symptom control among patients with ESHF. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: HKCTR-1562; Results.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidado de Transición , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Hong Kong , Visita Domiciliaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Teléfono , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 40(5): 704-14, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20728302

RESUMEN

This retrospective study aimed to compare noncancer deaths with cancer deaths in the following: 1) utilization of the public health care system in the last six months of life; 2) end-of-life care received; and 3) documentation of the advance care planning (ACP) process. The following sample was recruited from the deaths in 2006 in four public hospitals for analysis: 656 noncancer deaths consisting of 239 deaths from chronic renal failure (CRF), 242 deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 175 deaths from congestive heart failure (CHF), and 183 cancer deaths. Only 1.4% of noncancer patients received palliative care, compared with 79.2% of cancer patients. As compared with cancer, the noncancer patients were older (79.1±9.5 vs. 71.1±12.4 years, P<0.001) and had more comorbid conditions (2.3±1.4 vs. 1.6±1.4, P<0.001). Utilization of public health care was more intensive in noncancer patients, with more intensive care unit admissions, more ward admissions, more bed days occupied, and more clinic attendances. Within the last two weeks of life, the noncancer patients had more invasive interventions initiated, fewer symptoms documented, less analgesics and sedatives prescribed, less do-not-resuscitate orders in place, and more cardiopulomonary resuscitation performed. Dyspnea, edema, pain, and fatigue were among the most documented symptoms in both cancer and noncancer patients. A higher proportion of ACP discussions were first documented within three days before death in COPD and CHF patients as compared with CRF and cancer patients. There is a need to develop palliative care for noncancer patients in Hong Kong.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hong Kong , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 30(6): 536-43, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16376740

RESUMEN

Infection is common among advanced cancer patients. This study was undertaken to review the pattern of use of antibiotics and to identify potential factors that could affect outcomes after infection. The medical records of all patients with advanced cancer who were enrolled into the palliative care service of a district hospital during the period January, 2002 to July, 2002 were retrospectively reviewed for infections and the use of antibiotics. Among the eligible 87 patients, 17 did not have any infective episode and 70 had at least one infective episode and accounted for a total of 120 episodes. Sixty-eight episodes were associated with survival for >14 days, and 52 episodes were associated with survival of < or =14 days. The most frequent sites of infection were chest (n=63, 52.5%), urinary tract (n=35, 29.2%), and skin/wound (n=6, 5%). Antibiotics were prescribed for 97.5% (n=117) episodes. The use of second-line antibiotics was 16.2% (n=19). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, dyspnea [odds ratio (OR)=2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.1-6.3], antibiotic utilization pattern [empirical therapy (OR=4.8, 95% CI=1.7-13.2) vs. therapy according to antibiotic sensitivity], and route of administration [parenteral route (OR=3.3, 95% CI=1.3-8.2) vs. oral route] were identified as independent determinants affecting survival after infection. Dyspnea was possibly associated with poor prognosis during the treatment of infections in patients with advanced cancer, and antibiotic therapy according to sensitivity was associated with better prognosis. Further studies are encouraged to verify this. The bioethical principles on the use of antibiotics as a life-sustaining treatment should always be followed.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hong Kong/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Enfermo Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...