RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Serrated polyps of the colorectum have distinct histological features and malignant potential. AIM: To assess the association between the presence of serrated polyps and synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia. METHODS: Among 4989 asymptomatic Chinese individuals aged 50-70 years who underwent screening colonoscopy, 281 cases with advanced neoplasia (adenoma ≥1 cm, with tubulovillous/villous histology, with high-grade dysplasia, or invasive adenocarcinoma) were compared with 4708 controls without advanced neoplasia for age, sex, smoking history, body mass index, family history of colorectal cancer and the presence of serrated polyps. Independent predictors of advanced neoplasia were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of advanced neoplasia and serrated polyps (excluding small distal hyperplastic polyps) was 5.7% and 5.6%, respectively. 3.7% and 0.4% subjects had proximal and large (≥10 mm) serrated polyps, respectively. Independent predictors of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia were the presence of sessile serrated adenomas (OR: 4.52; 95% CI: 2.40-8.49), proximal serrated polyps (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.38-3.60), large serrated polyps (OR: 59.25; 95% CI: 18.85-186.21), hyperplastic polyps (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.03-2.67), three or more serrated polyps (OR: 4.86; 95% CI: 1.24-19.15) and one or more non-advanced tubular adenomas (OR: 3.58, 95% CI: 2.59-4.96). CONCLUSION: Detection of proximal, sessile and/or large serrated polyps at screening colonoscopy is independently associated with an increased risk for synchronous advanced neoplasia.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenoma/epidemiología , Pólipos del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , China , Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in screening individuals with a positive family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) is not clear. AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of FIT using colonoscopy findings as the gold standard in identifying colorectal neoplasms. METHODS: We analysed data from 4539 asymptomatic subjects aged 50-70 years who had both colonoscopy and FIT (Hemosure; W.H.P.M., Inc, El Monte, CA, USA) at our bowel cancer screening centre between 2008 and 2012. A total of 572 subjects (12.6%) had a family history of CRC. Our primary outcome was the sensitivity of FIT in detecting advanced neoplasms and cancers in subjects with a family history of CRC. A family history of CRC was defined as any first-degree relative with a history of CRC. RESULTS: Among 572 subjects with a family history of CRC, adenoma, advanced neoplasm and cancer were found at screening colonoscopy in 29.4%, 6.5% and 0.7% individuals, respectively. The sensitivity of FIT in detecting adenoma, advanced neoplasm and cancer was 9.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7-15.3], 35.1% (95% CI, 20.7-52.6) and 25.0% (95% CI, 1.3-78.1), respectively. Among FIT-negative subjects who have a family history of CRC, adenoma was found in 152 (29.6%), advanced neoplasm in 24 (4.7%) and cancer in 3 (0.6%) individuals. CONCLUSION: Compared with colonoscopy, FIT is more likely to miss advanced neoplasms or cancers in individuals with a family history of CRC.
