Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 45(6): 305-10, 1995 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8580473

RESUMEN

This paper reviews the range of health surveillance activities which can be utilized in the workplace by occupational health professionals for assessing fitness for work and contributing to the prevention of occupational illness and promotion of good health. The systematic approach described categorizes health surveillance procedures into occupational or non-occupational, risk-based or unfocused, and as primary, secondary or tertiary preventive measures. All categories of health surveillance are currently being practised to some extent, but the type of surveillance may not match the needs of the workplace in some situation. In order to aid health professionals in deciding which procedures should be implemented, recommendations based on an assessment of health risks are made. The key proposal is to establish a minimum level of periodic health surveillance for all workers based on a targeted lifestyle health risk assessment and a structured health questionnaire. Additional procedures can then be added sequentially as appropriate to manage any health risks in the workplace. The role of the unfocused periodic general medical examination is discussed in the context of the systematic approach and allows occupational professionals to critically appraise its usefulness.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Salud Laboral , Vigilancia de la Población , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Lugar de Trabajo
2.
Occup Environ Med ; 52(2): 129-33, 1995 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7757166

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of allergy to laboratory animals (ALA) during the first two years of employment, and to study the effect on ALA of atopy and sensitisation. METHODS: A follow up prospective study of ALA at the Zeneca (formerly ICI) Research Laboratories. RESULTS: The incidence of the disease during the first year of employment has remained at about 10% since the mid-1980s. This compares with an incidence of 37% in the early 1980s. The reduction in incidence and its maintenance at a lower level is thought to be due to the introduction and management of improved engineering controls, working practices, and educational programmes designed to reduce exposure to allergens from laboratory animals. The underlying incidence of immunological sensitisation to animals (the presence of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies to animal allergens) is much higher (40% after one and 53% after two years of exposure). Both atopic diathesis and presensitisation to laboratory animals increased the likelihood that a person would develop ALA. CONCLUSION: Neither factor predicted the disease accurately so their use should be restricted to the identification of people who may be more susceptible to the development of ALA (and thus who may need to pay particular attention to the use of personal protective equipment) rather than to their exclusion.


Asunto(s)
Animales de Laboratorio , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Animales , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cobayas , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Pruebas Inmunológicas , Incidencia , Personal de Laboratorio Clínico , Ratones , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Conejos , Ratas , Porcinos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA