Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Child Abuse Negl ; : 107008, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39242269

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Problematic sexual behavior (PSB) between siblings can be a form of sibling sexual abuse (SSA). A notable gap in research are studies examining PSB among preschool-age children with siblings. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of child maltreatment, exposure to family sexuality, and use of coercive sexual behavior on preschool-aged children PSB with siblings and with nonsiblings. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: All 284 children were ages 3-6 years with PSB who had siblings in the home (197 initiated PSB with siblings and 87 initiated PSB with non-siblings). METHODS: The two groups were compared on types of PSB, use of coercion, child maltreatment history, exposure to family sexuality, and caregiver attitudes. Caregiver report measures were the Child Sexual Behavior Inventory- Third Edition (CSBI-III), the Family Sexuality Index, and intake form on maltreatment experienced (i.e., physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, exposure to domestic violence, caregiver drug use, and failure to protect). RESULTS: Maltreatment history was significant, t(258) = -3.36, p < .001; sibling initiators were associated with higher rates of sexual and physical abuse, and neglect than non-sibling. Exposure to family sexuality was significant with non-sibling initiators demonstrating greater exposure than the sibling group, t(282) = 2.66, p = .008. There was no significance between groups for types of PSB including use of coercion. CONCLUSIONS: Results illuminated unique dynamics of PSB with siblings of preschool-aged children. A developmental framework integrating child maltreatment, impulsivity, environmental factors, and capabilities are key considerations for conceptualization, prevention, and response that is distinct from SSA of adolescents.

2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(1): 2179840, 2023 12 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36883777

RESUMEN

Invasive meningococcal disease is a life-threatening infection preventable through vaccination. Pediatric vaccination rates have declined during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This survey aimed to understand how parents' attitudes and behaviors have changed during the pandemic with regard to immunization and, more specifically, meningococcal vaccination. An online survey was emailed to parents of eligible children 0-4 years, following the selection process from UK, France, Germany, Italy, Brazil, Argentina, and Australia; and of adolescents 11-18 years from US. Data collection took place 19 January-16 February 2021. Quotas were set to ensure a representative sample. Eleven questions relating to general perceptions around vaccination and attitudes and behaviors toward meningitis vaccination were displayed. On 4,962 parents (average 35 years) participating in the survey, most (83%) believed important for their child to continue receiving recommended vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nearly half of routine vaccine appointments were delayed or canceled due to the pandemic, and 61% of respondents were likely to have their children catch up once COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. 30% of meningitidis vaccination appointments were canceled or delayed during the pandemic, and 21% of parents did not intend to reschedule them because of lockdown/stay at home regulations, and fear of catching COVID-19 in public places. It is crucial to communicate clear instructions to health workers and the general population and to provide appropriate safety precautions in vaccination centers. This will help to maintain vaccination rates and limit infections to prevent future outbreaks.


What is the context? Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon infection that can lead to permanent disabilities and even death.Meningitis vaccination can prevent IMDs caused by Neisseria meningitidis.Vaccination rates have declined during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.What is new? We collected opinion of parents from the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Brazil, Argentina, Australia, and the US, to understand their attitudes and behaviors toward meningitis vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic.Results were reviewed by health care professional experts as well as by patient authors (IMD survivors).Most (83%) of the 4,962 parents believed that it is important for their child to continue receiving recommended vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic.Half of the scheduled appointments for meningitis vaccination were canceled or delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly due to lockdown regulations and fear of catching COVID-19.Twenty-one percent of the parents who had their child's meningitis vaccination appointment canceled, did not intend to reschedule it.What is the impact? It is crucial that clear information is communicated by health care authorities and practitioners about the availability of vaccination during pandemic and the safety precautions that are taken.Collected opinions emphasize the importance of continuing vaccinations against infectious diseases during a pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Meningocócicas , Vacunas Meningococicas , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Pandemias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Meningocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Padres
3.
Clin Diabetes ; 39(4): 347-357, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34866778

RESUMEN

Timely and accurate mealtime insulin dosing can be an ongoing challenge for people with type 1 diabetes. This multinational, online study aimed to explore attitudes and behaviors around mealtime insulin dosing and the impact of mealtime dose timing, particularly with regard to premeal dosing (15-20 minutes before a meal). Although the majority of surveyed participants (96%) recognized the importance of accurate mealtime bolus insulin dosing, only a small proportion (35%) reported being "very confident" in accurate bolus insulin estimation. Given the choice, the majority of participants would prefer to administer insulin immediately before or after a meal, as this timing would improve their quality of life.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA