The impact of socioeconomic factors, social determinants, and ethnicity on the utilization of glucose sensor technology among persons with diabetes mellitus: a narrative review.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) usage has been shown to improve disease outcomes in people living with diabetes by facilitating better glycemic management. However, previous research has suggested that access to these devices can be influenced by nonmedical factors such as socioeconomic status and ethnicity. It is critical that equitable access to CGM devices is ensured as people from those groups experience poorer diabetes-related health outcomes. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of the various healthcare systems worldwide and how socioeconomic status, social context, and ethnicity shape device usage and the associated health outcomes. In general, we found that having a lower socioeconomic status and belonging to an ethnic minority group negatively impact CGM usage. While financial means proved to be an important mediator in this process, it was not the sole driver as disparities persisted even after adjustment for factors such as income and insurance status. Recommendations to increase CGM usage for people of a lower socioeconomic status and ethnic minorities include increasing the availability of financial, administrative, and educational support, for both patients and healthcare providers. However, recommendations will vary due to local country-specific circumstances, such as reimbursement criteria and healthcare ecosystems.

The effects of income, education, social factors and ethnicity on the use of glucose sensors by people with diabetes mellitus: a narrative review Over the recent years, glucose sensors have transformed the monitoring of glucose levels in people with diabetes. However, access to these devices has been determined by the healthcare systems and the associated rules and regulations, as well as perceptions from providers and patients about who would benefit most from these devices. In this narrative review, we performed an expansive literature search into what is known about factors that negatively impact the access to glucose sensors, and how these factors might be addressed. From this, we learn that, depending on the healthcare system, financial means form a major driver behind the disparities in glucose sensor use. However, factors such as ethnicity and provider and patient perceptions also can negatively affect one's chances to obtain a glucose sensor. Furthermore, we found that a successful program aimed at resolving the found disparities in glucose sensor use must be multi-faceted, and must include measures aimed at financial support, the use of objective and simple criteria for sensor eligibility, as well as educational support for both patients and providers.

Real-life 24-week changes in glycemic parameters among European users of flash glucose monitoring with type 1 and 2 diabetes and different levels of glycemic control.

AIM: To evaluate real-life changes of glycemic parameters among flash glucose monitoring (FLASH) users who do not meet glycemic targets. METHODS: De-identified data were obtained between 2014 and 2021 from patients using FLASH uninterrupted for a 24-week period. Glycemic parameters during first and last sensor use were examined in four identifiable groups: type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on basal-bolus insulin, T2DM on basal insulin, and T2DM without insulin treatment. Within each group, subgroup analyses were performed in persons with initial suboptimal glycemic regulation (time in range (TIR; 3.9-10 mmol/L) < 70%, time above range (TAR; >10 mmol/L) > 25%, or time below range (TBR; <3.9 mmol/L) > 4%). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 1,909 persons with T1DM and 1,813 persons with T2DM (1,499 basal-bolus insulin, 189 basal insulin, and 125 non-insulin users). In most of the performed analyses, both overall and in the various subgroups, significant improvements were observed in virtually all predefined primary (TIR) and secondary endpoints (eHbA1c, TAR, TBR and glucose variability). CONCLUSIONS: 24-weeks FLASH use in real life by persons with T1DM and T2DM with suboptimal glycemic regulation is associated with improvement of glycemic parameters, irrespective of pre-use regulation or treatment modality.

Commencement of flash glucose monitoring is associated with a decreased rate of depressive disorders among persons with diabetes (FLARE-NL7).

INTRODUCTION: Depressive disorders are more common among persons with diabetes, as compared with persons without diabetes. The burden of glucose management is known to associate with depressive symptoms. This study aims to assess the effects of commencement of FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (FSL-FGM) on the mental health status of persons with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of data from a 1-year prospective nationwide FSL-FGM registry. Participants who used FSL-FGM for 12 months and completed the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaires at baseline, 6 and 12 months were included. An SF-12v2 Mental Component Score (MCS) of ≤45 was used as a cut-off to discriminate between persons with and without a depressive disorder. RESULTS: A total of 674 patients were included with a mean age of 48.2 (±15.8) years, 51.2% men, 78.2% type 1 diabetes and baseline HbA1c 62.8 (±13.4) mmol/mol (7.9±1.2%). At baseline, 235 (34.9%) persons had an SF-12 MCS ≤45 while after 6 and 12 months these numbers decreased: 202 (30.0%, p<0.01) and 173 (25.7%, p<0.01). Overall, MCS improved from 48.5 at baseline to 50.7 after 6 months and 51.3 after 12 months. In multivariable regression analysis, age and MCS at baseline were associated with improvement of MCS after 12 months of FSL-FGM use. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that use of FSL-FGM is associated with a decreased rate of depressive disorders among persons with diabetes. Future studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Two-year use of flash glucose monitoring is associated with sustained improvement of glycemic control and quality of life (FLARE-NL-6).

INTRODUCTION: The FreeStyle Libre (FSL) is a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system. The Flash Monitor Register in the Netherlands (FLARE-NL-4) study previously demonstrated the positive effects of FSL-FGM use during 1 year on glycemic control, quality of life and disease burden among persons with diabetes mellitus (DM). The present follow-up study assesses the effects of FSL-FGM after 2 years. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients included in the FLARE-NL-4 study who continued FSL-FGM during the 1-year study period were invited to participate (n=687). Data were collected using questionnaires (the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) for quality of life), including self-reported hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). RESULTS: A total of 342 patients agreed to participate: mean age 48.0 (±15.6) years, 52% men and 79.5% with type 1 DM. HbA1c decreased from 60.7 (95% CI 59.1 to 62.3) mmol/mol before use of FSL-FGM to 57.3 (95% CI 55.8 to 58.8) mmol/mol after 1 year and 57.8 (95% CI 56.0 to 59.5) mmol/mol after 2 years. At the end of the 2-year follow-up period, 260 (76%) persons were still using the FSL-FGM and 82 (24%) had stopped. The main reason for stopping FSL-FGM was financial constraints (55%). Concerning the whole 2-year period, there was a significant decrease in HbA1c among persons who continued use of FSL-FGM (-3.5 mmol/mol, 95% CI -6.4 to -0.7), while HbA1c was unaltered compared with baseline among persons who stopped FSL-FGM (-2.4 mmol/mol, 95% CI -7.5 to 2.7): difference between groups 2.2 (95% CI -1.3 to 5.8) mmol/mol. After 2 years, persons who continued use of FSL-FGM had higher SF-12 mental component score and higher EQ-5D Dutch tariff score and felt less often anxious or depressed compared with persons who discontinued FSL-FGM. CONCLUSIONS: Although the considerable number of non-responders limits generalizability, this study suggests that persons who continue to use FSL-FGM for 2 years may experience sustained improvement in glycemic control and quality of life.

Flash Glucose Monitoring in the Netherlands: Increased monitoring frequency is associated with improvement of glycemic parameters.

AIMS: To evaluate the association between Flash Glucose Monitoring (FLASH) frequency and glycemic parameters during real-life circumstances in the Netherlands. METHODS: Obtained glucose readings were de-identified and uploaded to a dedicated database when FLASH reading devices were connected to internet. Data between September 2014 and March 2020, comprising 16,331 analyzable readers (163,762 sensors) were analyzed. Scan rate per reader was determined and each reader was sorted into 20 equally sized rank ordered groups (n = 817 each). RESULTS: Users performed a median of 11.5 [IQR 7.7-16.7] scans per day. Those in the lowest and highest ventiles scanned on average 3.7 and 40.0 times per day and had an eHbA1c of 8.6% (71 mmol/mol) and 6.9% (52 mmol/mol), respectively. Increasing scan rates were associated with more time in target range (3.9-10 mmol/L), less time in hyperglycemia (>10 mmol/L), and a lower standard deviation of glucose. An eHbA1c of 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) translated in approximately 65% time in target range, 30% time in hyperglycemia and 5% time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: These outcomes among Dutch FLASH users suggest that with higher scan rate glycemic control improves.

Selenite enrichment broth to improve the sensitivity in molecular diagnostics of Salmonella.

Selenite enrichment broth (SEB) is used to optimize the recovery of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica from stool samples. Compared to a direct culture approach, it enhances culture yield by reducing growth of faecal coliforms and faecal streptococci. Over the course of seven years from 2000 to 2017, 47,235 faecal samples were tested with a Salmonella PCR. We investigated the added value of using SEB in combination with faeces for DNA extraction, in order to improve the sensitivity of molecular diagnostics for detection of Salmonella. A Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica strain was tested for growth characteristics, with and without incubation in SEB, to determine the impact of Selenite enrichment in the Salmonella PCR. Retrospectively, a total of 102 Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica PCR positive faecal samples were re-analysed. DNA extraction was performed with the EasyMag® and MagNaPure96® system using three different input volumes of faeces and SEB. Prospectively, 114 Salmonella PCR positive faecal samples were retested within 2 days using five different input volumes for DNA extraction. Retrospectively, PCR that used SEB as part of input in the DNA extraction, 7/102 (7%) Salmonella PCR positive samples were additionally detected compared to no use of SEB. Of these, Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovariation Thompson, Enteritidis, 9,12:l.v and Senftenberg have been outbreak related in the past. Prospectively results were combined in collaboration with another microbiology laboratory, 15/114 (13.2%) additional specimens were detected with the Salmonella PCR, including processing Selenite enrichment broth. In conclusion, of the total 47,235 feacal samples, with SEB the prevalence of a positive PCR for Salmonella is 2.2%. Of these 2.2% positive Salmonella PCRs, 0.4% was not detected in culture. By using SEB an improved detection of Salmonella diagnostics could be realized and a substantial part of 13,2% additional Salmonella cases could be detected.

[Bone in a laparotomy scar]. / Bot in een laparotomielitteken.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification is the formation of bone in tissues outside the skeletal system. Ectopic bone in a midline laparotomy scar is usually asymptomatic. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 59-year-old man was referred by his GP to the surgical outpatient clinic because of dull epigastric pain along with a painful swelling. He had undergone a midline laparotomy 6 months earlier. A CT scan revealed a longitudinal ossification of 9 cm in length, extending from the xyphoid process to the umbilicus. The structure was excised because of progressive symptoms. The diagnosis of heterotopic ossification was confirmed by histopathology. CONCLUSION: This case describes the clinical and histopathological presentation of heterotopic ossification in a laparotomy scar. Current insights and the pathophysiology of this condition are reviewed. Treatment is only indicated in symptomatic patients, and consists of surgical excision.