Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Surg ; 41(2): 449-456, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27671014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopy (SIL) and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) aim at reducing surgical access trauma. To monitor the introduction of emerging technologies, the Swiss Association for Laparo- and Thoracoscopic Surgeons launched a database in 2010. The current status of SIL and NOTES in Switzerland is reported, and the techniques are compared. METHODS: The number and type of procedures, surgeon experience, their impressions of performance, conversion, and complications between 2010 and 2015 are described. A survey was used to acquire additional data not included in the registry. RESULTS: Nine centers included 650 procedures. Cholecystectomy (55 %) and sigmoidectomy (26 %) were most prevalent in both techniques. The number of active centers declined from 9 to 2 during the study period. The frequencies of taught procedures were 4 and 43 % for SIL and NOTES (p < 0.001), and surgeon self-estimated impression of performance was perfect in 50 and 89 %, respectively (p < 0.0001). Conversions in total were 3.6 and 5.7 %, respectively, and 1.1 % to open for both techniques. Morbidity was 5 % in SIL and 2.7 % in NOTES, with 0.8 % access-related complications in NOTES and none in SIL (p = 0.29). Of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, sigmoidectomy, and right hemicolectomy, 11.4 and 15.6 % of cases were operated using SIL or NOTES, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although in selected specialized centers, a considerable proportion of patients were treated using novel techniques, a fading interest of the surgical community in SIL and NOTES was observed. The proportion of SIL and NOTES procedures taught is insufficient and calls for improvement.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/métodos , Suiza/epidemiología
2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 20(10): 1760-8, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27456017

RESUMEN

AIM: Energy devices represent an alternative to clips and staplers for vessel sealing. Outcome data of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with use of a novel combined ultrasonic and bipolar energy device (TB, Thunderbeat™) was gathered. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery using TB were prospectively included between November 2011 and January 2016. Large vessels were dissected using the energy device without additional clips or staplers. The type of procedure, operative time, length of stay, complications, blood transfusions, number and type of vessels being dissected, and need for additional clips were noted. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-three patients underwent 758 procedures with dissection of 1310 large vessels. No additional hemoclips or vascular staplers were used. There were 0.7 % (5/758) intraoperative and 2.6 % (20/758) postoperative bleeding complications. Eleven bleeding occurred at the stapler line of anastomosis, leaving 1.8 % (14/758) bleeding that were potentially related to inadequate hemostasis. Failure of large vessel dissection occurred in two cases (0.15 %, 2/1310) and device-related complications in 1.1 % (8/758). Two of 42 conversions (5.5 %) were bleeding-related. CONCLUSION: TB provides a reliable and effective hemostasis. However, ligation failure may occur. As with any kind of electrosurgery, the hot tip of the instruments bears the risk of potentially fatal thermal injuries.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Laparoscopía/métodos , Disección/efectos adversos , Femenino , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Ultrasonido
3.
Praxis (Bern 1994) ; 105(8): 453-6, 2016 Apr 13.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27078729

RESUMEN

As minimal invasive abdominal surgery became established in the last decades, further minimization of the surgical access is in the focus now. Although laparoscopic instruments and camera systems become diminished in size there is still a need for a minilaparotomy for extraction and anastomosis of organs. NOTES (Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) aims to avoid this minilaparotomy. Consequently, laparoscopic-assisted procedures become pure laparoscopic surgery. The transvaginal access is the most common performed NOTES procedure. The acceptance in women is high. The feasibility of NOTES cholecystectomy is scientifically proofed. The procedure is associated with less pain than the common four-port laparoscopic surgery and does not interfere with the sexual well-being. There are no access-related infections; the abdominal wound infection and incisional hernia rate are low. In left sided colonic resection the transrectal access makes NOTES available for both genders.


Asunto(s)
Cicatriz/prevención & control , Endoscopía/tendencias , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud
4.
J Am Coll Surg ; 223(2): 299-307, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27086090

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In transrectal rigid-hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic sigmoidectomy (trNS), extraction-site laparotomy is avoided, which reduces postoperative pain and improves recovery time. However, current research evaluating anorectal function after trNS is limited. This study aims to evaluate clinical continence, anorectal manometry, and quality of life in patients undergoing trNS for diverticular disease. STUDY DESIGN: Between November 2013 and October 2015, patients undergoing trNS for diverticular disease were prospectively included. Patients converted to laparoscopic resection with an extraction-site laparotomy before attempted transrectal access were excluded. Anorectal manometry, including measurement of resting pressure, squeeze pressure, and retention tests; and questionnaires on continence, defecation, quality of life, and cosmesis, were obtained before and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study. Four were converted and 1 was lost to follow-up, leaving 20 patients included in the study. Mean anal resting pressure before surgery was 59.3 mmHg (95% CI, 51.81-66.79 mmHg), decreasing to 48.85 mmHg (95% CI, 43.75-53.95 mmHg) at 3 months (p = 0.015). It normalized to 53.45 mmHg (95% CI, 47.78-59.12 mmHg) at 6 months (p = 0.168). Maximum anal squeeze pressure, retention tests, and St Marks incontinence score remained unchanged during the follow-up. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index remained high before (124 points) and at 6 months after surgery (128.8 points; p = 0.544). CONCLUSIONS: Six months after trNS, neither clinical continence nor manometric findings deteriorated. Quality of life after trNS for recurrent diverticulitis is excellent. Long-term implications of a temporary decline in resting pressure after 3 months remain unclear and warrant long-term follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/fisiopatología , Colectomía/métodos , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Recto/fisiopatología , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Manometría , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
J Am Coll Surg ; 221(4): 789-97, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26282488

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to evaluate the feasibility of transrectal rigid hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) sigmoidectomy (trNS) in a series of consecutive prospective patients with diverticular disease. The NOTES for left colectomy offers patients reduced pain and easier recovery. Limited data are available for trNS, which is considered safe for various indications. However, the technique is not standardized, and patients in the reported series are highly selected. STUDY DESIGN: Patients scheduled for trNS were entered into a prospective registry on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary endpoint was trNS feasibility, and secondary endpoints were morbidity, pain, length of stay, and inflammatory response. A medial-to-lateral dissection with full mobilization of the splenic flexure and total intracorporeal anastomosis was performed. The rectum was covered with a wound protector for transrectal extraction. RESULTS: Of 95 elective sigmoidectomies, 81% (n = 77) were enrolled for either transvaginal NOTES resection (n = 37) or trNS (n = 40). There was no difference in body mass index or indication between patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy (LAS), transvaginal resection, or trNS, although trNS patients were younger. Mainly because of a mismatch of bulky specimen and narrow pelvis, 17.5% of trNS were converted to LAS. Major morbidity was 10%, including 2 septic complications. During the study, the anastomosis technique was changed from double stapled end-to-end to side-to-end anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: Transrectal rigid hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic sigmoidectomy is feasible and safe in a high proportion of unselected consecutive patients with diverticular disease undergoing elective treatment. Intracorporeal side-to-end anastomosis is the preferred technique, and trNS should be offered for elective sigmoidectomy presupposing advanced laparoscopic experience.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Divertículo del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Endoscopios , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/instrumentación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recto
6.
Surg Endosc ; 29(11): 3363-6, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25539694

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic local excision is accepted for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and benign lesions of the stomach. Yet, tumors at the gastroesophageal junction, on the posterior wall, or in the distal antrum are difficult to approach. Such tumors often must be exposed via gastrotomy or using a rendezvous maneuver. Our method of total intragastric laparoscopic resection using 'pneumogastrum', rigid laparoscope, and conventional laparoscopic instruments is described in an intuitive video. METHODS: Two cases of total inverse transgastric resection involved resection of a submucosal GIST, one at the front wall of the cardia and the other on the posterior wall of the antrum. The third case required excision of a large prepyloric cystic lesion leading to a gastric outlet stenosis. After insertion of three trocars under laparoscopic control, a further trocar was introduced into the stomach and 'pneumogastrum' was established. Two additional 5-mm trocars were intragastrally placed. Intragastric endoscopy with a rigid optic provided an excellent view. The tumor was exposed resected with a linear stapler. The specimen was inserted into an Endo Pouch™ which was sutured to an orally inserted gastric tube. The Endo Pouch™ was gently pulled transorally. After removal of the intragastric trocars, the entrance points were laparoscopically closed. RESULTS: From the first and second cases, we retrieved GIST tumors. In the third case, we retrieved a gastritis cystica profunda. Postoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric GIST should be resected laparoscopically if negative margins are safely achieved regardless of its size. Tumors at the frontwall and exophytic backwall GIST are addressed by laparoscopic wedge resection. Tumors at the gastrojejunal junction, in the prepyloric region, and fundus as well as submucous GIST of the gastric backwall are best approached by intragastric laparoscopic resection. Transoral specimen retrieval is an interesting option in smaller tumors.


Asunto(s)
Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Gastrectomía/instrumentación , Gastritis/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopios , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...